Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 76

Thread: Wheat - rejection and editing advice

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default Are these photos good enough to be submitted?

    If they aren't please tell me what I need to do to fix themClick image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3504 (3).JPG 
Views:	116 
Size:	1.34 MB 
ID:	16092Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5198 (2).jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	1.84 MB 
ID:	16093

  2. #22
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    If they aren't please tell me what I need to do to fix themClick image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3504 (3).JPG 
Views:	116 
Size:	1.34 MB 
ID:	16092Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5198 (2).jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	1.84 MB 
ID:	16093
    No. 1. Is too dark, soft, low contrast and has obstructed main gear.

    No. 2. Is soft and overexposed. It’s also a touch low in the frame.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  3. #23
    Member crisquijano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Costa Rica (MROC)
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Hi Wheat,
    Short answer: no.

    Unfortunately, you are asking to pre-screen these but they don’t comply with pre-screening guidelines: upload size basically. Please read the Upload Guidelines here for more details.

    As editing advice, I can tell you that #1 is too noisy, soft, lacks contrast, among others. Also, The 787 is loaded with chromatic aberration and soft, among others.

    My advice is to shoot in better weather or closer to the subject.

    I hope this helps.

    -cq

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 what about now

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 what about now
    I'll edit the size later

  6. #26
    Member vcruvinel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Brasília, Brazil.
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    I'll edit the size later
    Both of them are not in the upload size so I can not give some opinions, even I'm not from the crew.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

  7. #27
    Member jvdl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3747 (2).JPG 
Views:	182 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	16094 what about now
    I'm not from the screening team, but for what it's worth your photos are soft around the tail (see the blurry registration mark, for example) and there is strong chromatic aberration around the edges of the plane. What lens are you using?

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jvdl View Post
    I'm not from the screening team, but for what it's worth your photos are soft around the tail (see the blurry registration mark, for example) and there is strong chromatic aberration around the edges of the plane. What lens are you using?
    A 300mm

  9. #29
    Member jvdl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    A 300mm
    If it's one of the budget-friendly Sigma or Tamron lenses, then the chromatic aberration and softness are probably here to stay. I used to have one of those and you get what you pay for, I'm afraid.

  10. #30
    Member crisquijano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Costa Rica (MROC)
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    A 300mm
    Hi.
    Did you shoot through a window? that would explain some of the distortion/aberration.

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default Thoughts on this https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6747493

    Please how this photo is and if it has a good chance to get accepted. Since for some reason I can't add a photo to this I left the link in the title

  12. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	edit (4).jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	153.8 KB 
ID:	17742 heres the photo it wouldn't let me put it on it at 1st

  13. #33
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,403

    Default

    Not much contrast for a very common plane, not sure it has much chances sorry

    Alex

  14. #34
    Junior Member dfwairport.jpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5

    Default

    One of your fellow Dallas spotters here, the screeners here aren't out to get you. It is in their best interest to accept your photos to add to the growing database. They take time out of their very busy days to screen photos for us, they have absolutely no obligation to screen or accept your photos. Making forum posts about your "wrongly rejected photos" won't make a difference. Something I learned early on is to not take the rejections personally, they're screening the photos not you.

  15. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Beijing, China / College Station, TX, USA
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dallasfortworth View Post
    Attachment 22763Attachment 22764Attachment 22764Attachment 22765Attachment 22766Attachment 22767

    As of now I'm currently at 4 photos on jetphoto and I'd like to get more up soon anyway can someone pre screen these for me? Thanks (ignore the 2nd Iceland air)

    (To the screener that screened my photo sorry If my reply seemed rude)
    Well said Dayon. Don't take the rejections personally. - From 2.5 hrs south of DFW.

    Now for this photos:

    1. Contrast.
    2. Composition, color.
    3. Blurry tail.
    4. Blurry.
    5. Composition, soft.

  16. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Another Dallas spotter here, I wouldn't complain about not getting accepted on the forums, just look at the guidelines https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version and that should help you to realize why those photos were rejected, and what to do to fix them. Happy spotting!

  17. #37
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Hello,

    Please read here thoroughly, especially #3:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Also, please contact admin via email to have your password reset on your dream*****[email protected] (Wheat) account, as this one will be closed.

  18. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Hello,

    Please read here thoroughly, especially #3:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Also, please contact admin via email to have your password reset on your dream*****[email protected] (Wheat) account, as this one will be closed.
    I apologize for putting more then 5 In can I still submit more (5 though)

  19. #39
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wheat View Post
    I apologize for putting more then 5 In can I still submit more (5 though)
    Yes, you can repost five of those above. Once you've done that, I'll remove the other account.

  20. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5195.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	516.7 KB 
ID:	23404Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6530.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	597.0 KB 
ID:	23405Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7973.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	459.7 KB 
ID:	23406Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6430-4.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	256.7 KB 
ID:	23407Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7861.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	445.2 KB 
ID:	23408

    pre screening for these please

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •