Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wheat - rejection and editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25547[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25548[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25549[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25550[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25551[/ATTACH]

    I'm back and I have 9 photos uploaded. Anyway can someone please pre screen these?
    1: does not meet size ratio requirements
    2-4: soft, lack of contrast
    5: lacks a lot of contrast, mainly mid tones and shadows
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #62
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9555-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.9 KB
ID:	1040277Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9802-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	441.5 KB
ID:	1040278Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9325-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	286.6 KB
ID:	1040279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9083-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.1 KB
ID:	1040280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9350.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	347.0 KB
ID:	1040281

      pre screening for these please thanks!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Wheat View Post
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]25712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25714[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25715[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25716[/ATTACH]

        pre screening for these please thanks!
        1. borderline contrast
        2. contrast
        3. ok
        4. exposure/contrast
        5. ok

        Comment


        • #64
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9555-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	516.9 KB
ID:	1040298Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9802-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	467.9 KB
ID:	1040299

          Is this better?

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Wheat View Post
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]25733[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25734[/ATTACH]

            Is this better?
            1. acceptable for me
            2. don't think this one is fixable

            Comment


            • #66
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6127.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	260.9 KB
ID:	1040532Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6416.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	300.5 KB
ID:	1040533Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6530.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	596.8 KB
ID:	1040534[ATTACH=CONFIG]26004


              Pre screening for these please and thank you Dlowwa for pre screening my photos last time.

              (Ignore them being attached thumbnail I messed up while doing something)
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Wheat View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]26000[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26001[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26002[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26004


                Pre screening for these please and thank you Dlowwa for pre screening my photos last time.

                (Ignore them being attached thumbnail I messed up while doing something)
                1. overprocessed (editing halos), borderline contrast
                2. soft
                3. cut off, soft, centering
                4. overprocessed, cut off, color
                5. manipulation, soft/blurry

                Last one would likely get a warning put on your account. I wouldn't be submitting that one if I were you.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  1. overprocessed (editing halos), borderline contrast
                  2. soft
                  3. cut off, soft, centering
                  4. overprocessed, cut off, color
                  5. manipulation, soft/blurry

                  Last one would likely get a warning put on your account. I wouldn't be submitting that one if I were you.
                  Any tips on how to get rid of halos

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
                    Any tips on how to get rid of halos
                    You can't, really. You can only avoid them in the first place.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0016.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	307.8 KB
ID:	1040564Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0042-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	304.4 KB
ID:	1040565Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0076-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	299.1 KB
ID:	1040566Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9963-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	285.0 KB
ID:	1040567

                      pre screening for these please and thank you
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Wheat View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]26037[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26038[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26039[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26040[/ATTACH]

                        pre screening for these please and thank you
                        1. contrast, soft, cropping/ratio
                        2. contrast, soft, horizon
                        3. contrast, soft, cropping/ratio
                        4. contrast, soft
                        5. soft, horizon, cropping/ratio

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9963-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	288.8 KB
ID:	1040569Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0076-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	293.2 KB
ID:	1040570

                          Are these better?

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Wheat View Post
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]26043[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26044[/ATTACH]

                            Are these better?
                            No, would be rejected for same reasons as mentioned previously, although #5 should have read 'soft, *contrast, cropping/ratio'

                            You should at least read the basics for image requirements here to get the ratio correct, but the poor light/contrast makes it not really worth putting too much more effort into these images.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8619.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	433.0 KB
ID:	1040746Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9338.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1040747Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9788.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	469.6 KB
ID:	1040748

                              pre screening for these please (I'll send in the other 2 in another post)

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9230.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	307.1 KB
ID:	1040749Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6126.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	254.1 KB
ID:	1040750

                                Here's the other two

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X