Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IT88 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by IT88 View Post
    Hello!
    Could you prescreen this shot:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22851[/ATTACH]

    Thank you!
    Light editing halos visible, slightly soft, and also borderline for dark/contrast.

    Comment


    • #47
      Good evening!
      Please help me with this one:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	190115_UR-CQX_JPnet_1920px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	471.2 KB
ID:	1033883

      And thanks for the previous answers.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by IT88 View Post
        Good evening!
        Please help me with this one:

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]22929[/ATTACH]
        What specifically would you like help with?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          What specifically would you like help with?
          Does it look acceptable?
          If not, what should I change or improve?

          I'm not sure if brightness and contrast are OK.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by IT88 View Post
            Does it look acceptable?
            If not, what should I change or improve?
            Contrast is very borderline, and I don't think it can be improved due to the overcast light. Also somewhat compressed.

            Comment


            • #51
              Hello

              Got a rejection on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354500

              I improved a bit brightness, does it look acceptable now?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	190602_ER-COS_JPnet_1920px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.97 MB
ID:	1040126


              Same with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354454

              Click image for larger version

Name:	190602_ER-20121_JPnet_1920px.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	519.2 KB
ID:	1040130

              Thank you!

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by IT88 View Post
                Hello

                Got a rejection on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354500

                I improved a bit brightness, does it look acceptable now?

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25531[/ATTACH]


                Same with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354454

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25535[/ATTACH]

                Thank you!
                1: still too dark
                2: contrast is still off, due to the position of the sun. The photo is almost backlit. I doubt, any editing will get a proper looking photo.
                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                Comment


                • #53
                  Hello!
                  Could you help me with this rejection.

                  JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                  How the shot can be over and underexposed at the same time?

                  Don't get me wrong, it's no offense at all, I just really want to clarify this question for me and improve my editing skills.

                  I got initial rejection as the dark shot, which I presume really was. So I added brightness to the shot and got this second rejection ��
                  How would you suggest me to edit this shot to make it acceptable, including contrast problem?

                  Thank you for the explanation!

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by IT88 View Post
                    Hello!
                    Could you help me with this rejection.

                    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                    How the shot can be over and underexposed at the same time?

                    Don't get me wrong, it's no offense at all, I just really want to clarify this question for me and improve my editing skills.

                    I got initial rejection as the dark shot, which I presume really was. So I added brightness to the shot and got this second rejection ��
                    How would you suggest me to edit this shot to make it acceptable, including contrast problem?

                    Thank you for the explanation!
                    I'd prefer if screeners not include seemingly opposite rejection reasons as well, but in this case the very harsh light is leading to parts of the aircraft being overexposed, while the rest is quite dark. If you wanted to be technical, I would remove the 'dark' rejection and just leave it as overexposed with harsh contrast. Also seems to be a cyan/green tint as well.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Good morning!

                      I presume that now the shot now has too much contast:

                      JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                      But it looks natural to me. Please give me advice on how I can make this shot acceptable.
                      Should I reduce general contrast of the shot using brightness/contrast tool or maybe just reduce darkness of the plane belly using curves or even shadows/highlights?

                      Thank you!

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by IT88 View Post
                        Good morning!

                        I presume that now the shot now has too much contast:

                        JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                        But it looks natural to me. Please give me advice on how I can make this shot acceptable.
                        Should I reduce general contrast of the shot using brightness/contrast tool or maybe just reduce darkness of the plane belly using curves or even shadows/highlights?

                        Thank you!
                        Not sure this shot can be made acceptable. The angle & light are just not very good at all.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          Not sure this shot can be made acceptable. The angle & light are just not very good at all.
                          Thank you

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Please prescreen these shots:

                            1)Click image for larger version

Name:	190519_G-REGJ_JPnet_1600px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.51 MB
ID:	1040376 2)Click image for larger version

Name:	190519_G-JOHA_JPnet_1920px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	327.8 KB
ID:	1040377 3)Click image for larger version

Name:	190519_EGBK_JPnet_1920px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.93 MB
ID:	1040378

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Good evening!
                              Please help me with this shot:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	190602_ER-07206_JPnet_1600px.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1040805

                              Technically there was no backlit, Sun was at Antonov's 1 or 2 o'clock, but little right bank adds some shadows on the fuselage. Is the photo acceptable in this case or not?

                              Thank you!

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by IT88 View Post
                                Good evening!
                                Please help me with this shot:
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]26305[/ATTACH]

                                Technically there was no backlit, Sun was at Antonov's 1 or 2 o'clock, but little right bank adds some shadows on the fuselage. Is the photo acceptable in this case or not?

                                Thank you!
                                Some editing halos and maybe a touch soft, but otherwise should be ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X