Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 60 of 60

Thread: IT88 - Editing Advice

  1. #41

  2. #42
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Possibly, but looks like they were maybe taken through a window, in which case if there are reflections visible, it cannot be fixed.

  3. #43
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Could you prescreen and help me with this shot:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	181005_UR-CZZ_1_JPnet_1600px.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,003.3 KB 
ID:	18972

    Thank you!

  4. #44
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Could you prescreen and help me with this shot:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	181005_UR-CZZ_1_JPnet_1600px.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1,003.3 KB 
ID:	18972

    Thank you!
    Would be rejected for compression and overprocessing. The color of the sky below the wing is very different from the sky above it.

  5. #45
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Hello!
    Could you prescreen this shot:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190321_9H-OME_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	22851

    Thank you!

  6. #46
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Hello!
    Could you prescreen this shot:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190321_9H-OME_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	22851

    Thank you!
    Light editing halos visible, slightly soft, and also borderline for dark/contrast.

  7. #47
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Good evening!
    Please help me with this one:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190115_UR-CQX_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	471.2 KB 
ID:	22929

    And thanks for the previous answers.

  8. #48
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Good evening!
    Please help me with this one:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190115_UR-CQX_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	471.2 KB 
ID:	22929
    What specifically would you like help with?

  9. #49
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    What specifically would you like help with?
    Does it look acceptable?
    If not, what should I change or improve?

    I'm not sure if brightness and contrast are OK.

  10. #50
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Does it look acceptable?
    If not, what should I change or improve?
    Contrast is very borderline, and I don't think it can be improved due to the overcast light. Also somewhat compressed.

  11. #51
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Hello

    Got a rejection on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354500

    I improved a bit brightness, does it look acceptable now?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-COS_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.97 MB 
ID:	25531


    Same with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354454

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-20121_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	519.2 KB 
ID:	25535

    Thank you!

  12. #52
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Hello

    Got a rejection on this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354500

    I improved a bit brightness, does it look acceptable now?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-COS_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.97 MB 
ID:	25531


    Same with this rejection: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7354454

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-20121_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	519.2 KB 
ID:	25535

    Thank you!
    1: still too dark
    2: contrast is still off, due to the position of the sun. The photo is almost backlit. I doubt, any editing will get a proper looking photo.

  13. #53
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Hello!
    Could you help me with this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7387689

    How the shot can be over and underexposed at the same time?

    Don't get me wrong, it's no offense at all, I just really want to clarify this question for me and improve my editing skills.

    I got initial rejection as the dark shot, which I presume really was. So I added brightness to the shot and got this second rejection ��
    How would you suggest me to edit this shot to make it acceptable, including contrast problem?

    Thank you for the explanation!

  14. #54
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Hello!
    Could you help me with this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7387689

    How the shot can be over and underexposed at the same time?

    Don't get me wrong, it's no offense at all, I just really want to clarify this question for me and improve my editing skills.

    I got initial rejection as the dark shot, which I presume really was. So I added brightness to the shot and got this second rejection ��
    How would you suggest me to edit this shot to make it acceptable, including contrast problem?

    Thank you for the explanation!
    I'd prefer if screeners not include seemingly opposite rejection reasons as well, but in this case the very harsh light is leading to parts of the aircraft being overexposed, while the rest is quite dark. If you wanted to be technical, I would remove the 'dark' rejection and just leave it as overexposed with harsh contrast. Also seems to be a cyan/green tint as well.

  15. #55
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Good morning!

    I presume that now the shot now has too much contast:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7391631

    But it looks natural to me. Please give me advice on how I can make this shot acceptable.
    Should I reduce general contrast of the shot using brightness/contrast tool or maybe just reduce darkness of the plane belly using curves or even shadows/highlights?

    Thank you!

  16. #56
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Good morning!

    I presume that now the shot now has too much contast:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7391631

    But it looks natural to me. Please give me advice on how I can make this shot acceptable.
    Should I reduce general contrast of the shot using brightness/contrast tool or maybe just reduce darkness of the plane belly using curves or even shadows/highlights?

    Thank you!
    Not sure this shot can be made acceptable. The angle & light are just not very good at all.

  17. #57
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Not sure this shot can be made acceptable. The angle & light are just not very good at all.
    Thank you

  18. #58
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Please prescreen these shots:

    1)Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190519_G-REGJ_JPnet_1600px.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	1.51 MB 
ID:	25832 2)Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190519_G-JOHA_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	327.8 KB 
ID:	25833 3)Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190519_EGBK_JPnet_1920px.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.93 MB 
ID:	25834

  19. #59
    Junior Member IT88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Chisinau, Moldova
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Good evening!
    Please help me with this shot:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-07206_JPnet_1600px.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	26305

    Technically there was no backlit, Sun was at Antonov's 1 or 2 o'clock, but little right bank adds some shadows on the fuselage. Is the photo acceptable in this case or not?

    Thank you!

  20. #60
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IT88 View Post
    Good evening!
    Please help me with this shot:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	190602_ER-07206_JPnet_1600px.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	26305

    Technically there was no backlit, Sun was at Antonov's 1 or 2 o'clock, but little right bank adds some shadows on the fuselage. Is the photo acceptable in this case or not?

    Thank you!
    Some editing halos and maybe a touch soft, but otherwise should be ok.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •