Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are carry-on bags a safety issue?
Collapse
X
-
I make sure that my cabin baggage conforms with the maximum permissible size. It would help if the airlines stopped passengers carrying on huge suitcases, some of which exceed the size of my checked baggage !
As far as "educating" passengers concerning the retrieval of carry on luggage during an emergency is concerned.....well.....all I can say is, it is difficult to "educate" stupid ! All I can say is that I weigh 23 stone. If I am behind you in the evacuation queue and you stop to retrieve carry on baggage then you can expect to be pushed back into your seat or trampled to the floor. Male, female, I couldn't care less, I intend to survive !If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
-
I completely agree the airlines are their own worst enemies with the cabin baggage mess. Though of course there may be method in the madness because people are quicker to board now, so they can be sure to secure overhead locker space above their seat.
I personally think it’s a sensible policy to carry one’s keys, passport, wallet, phone and other essential stuff on one’s person for take-off and landing. Perhaps airlines could make this kind of recommendation and couple it with the prohibition on carrying out other items. It’s hard indeed to expect people not to want to retrieve essential items. These days the loss of personal documentation is a massive inconvenience. We have to work around human nature and think of persuasive ways to deal with instant tendencies in an emergency situation. Flat outright condemnations of “normal” behaviour aren’t going to work, nor are threats of violence by one passenger against another.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HalcyonDays View Post.........These days the loss of personal documentation is a massive inconvenience. ...........If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Originally posted by brianw999 View PostUnnecessary loss of life is, however a far greater inconvenience. 5 extra seconds in a cabin that is filling with smoke can be the measure of the difference between life and death.
Possible ways to stop this are not to allow passengers to bring their bags on in the first place or have lockable overhead lockers keyed to the seatbelts-on signs. I’m sure there are technical and regulatory objections to the latter. The former isn’t going to happen either. Airlines are not in the business of deterring passengers, especially if they now charge for checked bags. Another answer is for the airlines to emphasise what has to be done in stronger terms with graphic video and instructions in their safety demo. That’s not going to happen either, we all know that too, as people’s feelings need to be protected.
I think we have to accept the reality of human nature : unless you remove the problem by removing the issue, some or most people are going to take their hand baggage. How many lives have been lost by passengers taking their hand luggage with them anyway ? I know that’s not the point, but the wide circulation of all these evacuation videos in recent years demonstrates to the herd that actually it is both safe and OK to take your hand luggage.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HalcyonDays View PostPossible ways to stop this are not to allow passengers to bring their bags on in the first place or have lockable overhead lockers keyed to the seatbelts-on signs. I’m sure there are technical and regulatory objections to the latter.
The problem, as always, is the lack of will. Airlines do not want the expense of something that will very rarely—if ever—be needed. If they had any say in the matter, there would be no third or fourth hydraulic system (they already did away with the third and fourth engine on overseas flights). So the will has to come from the regulators, in the form of hindsight, foresight and precautious wisdom. That often seems to be missing as well.
In the meantime, people drag their bags down the chutes, everyone gets off ok and the chutes remain inflated. It's easy to think the current situation is sufficiently safe, especially if you lack imagination and favor the bottom line...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI see nothing that would prevent the installation of a locking mechanism controlled from the cockpit and FA stations, to be included in the evac procedure. It would have to earn certification of course, but so do the window shades. I suppose it would have to have a manual override, using a specialized key on each individual compartment, in case it locked unintentionally. And any compartments housing emergency equipment would have to be exempted. I can't think of any other concerns.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ATLcrew View PostOne concern might be panicked people trying with all their might to open these "locked compartments" thus delaying an evacuation even more. A crowd is hard to predict, a crown in distress in a small space might as well be a wounded cheetah, anything can happen.Mind you, if I were King, I'd ban overhead compartments outright. If it doesn't fit under the seat in front of you, it goes in the belly. Boggles the mind the number of problems that would solve.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI think a bit of pre-flight briefing on the fact the, in the UNLIKELY event of an emergency evacuation, overhead compartments will be locked and inaccessible until the captain has determined that there is no longer a risk to the safety of the passengers. Sure, there will still be idiots...
That is a great idea Evan. You can be sure that everyone that even heard, let alone understood the flight attendants briefing, will abide by this and get off the aircraft in an orderly fashion. Especially when their passport, money and brand new MacBook Pro is in the overhead.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI think a bit of pre-flight briefing on the fact the, in the UNLIKELY event of an emergency evacuation, overhead compartments will be locked and inaccessible until the captain has determined that there is no longer a risk to the safety of the passengers might suffice for most people to give up that futile endeavor and get off the airplane with their lives.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View Post...I can't think of any other concerns...
Here's a REAL cool one.
The wiring that operates the automatic locking feature short circuits and damn the bad luck, the circuit breaker malfunctions at exactly the same time, and then the plane catches on fire.
Stranger things have happened, like center fuel tanks going boom, battery banks getting really hot and engines slinging the occasional blade or disk here and there with bad results.
And then to make it MORE interesting- we have ATL's theory that also comes into play.
Sucks how almost everything involves a trade-off.Les règles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoeingBobby View PostThat is a great idea Evan. You can be sure that everyone that even heard, let alone understood the flight attendants briefing, will abide by this and get off the aircraft in an orderly fashion. Especially when their passport, money and brand new MacBook Pro is in the overhead.
Grabbing your bag during an evac is what I call a 'why tf not' manuever. It's a crime of opportunity. The overhead is unlocked, I've got a second, the bag is right there, so why tf not. That's the mentality. Sure, there are very good reasons not to, but some people are idiots.
All they need is an answer to 'why tf not', i.e. a reason tf not to do it.
Now, if you lock the overheads, they go "oh, there's a reason tf not to: I can't". The opportunity no longer presents itself. They will concentrate on getting out alive without it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI'm not exactly sure what you and ATL are imagining here... So, the plane is on fire, the cabin crew have made in clear that the overheads will be locked, they are locked, CANT BE OPENED, and yet you believe passengers are going to stand there, banging and clawing on the overhead IN VAIN to get at their bags while everyone is panicking to get tf out of there? I seriously doubt that. Grabbing your bag during an evac is what I call a 'why tf not' manuever. It's a crime of opportunity. The overhead is unlocked, I've got a second, the bag is right there, so why tf not. That's the mentality. Sure, there are very good reasons not to, but some people are idiots.All they need is an answer to 'why tf not', i.e. a reason tf not to do it. Now, if you lock the overheads, they go "oh, there's a reason tf not to: I can't". The opportunity no longer presents itself. They will concentrate on getting out alive without it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI'm not exactly sure what you and ATL are imagining here... So, the plane is on fire, the cabin crew have made in clear that the overheads will be locked, they are locked, CANT BE OPENED, and yet you believe passengers are going to stand there, banging and clawing on the overhead IN VAIN to get at their bags while everyone is panicking to get tf out of there? I seriously doubt that.
Grabbing your bag during an evac is what I call a 'why tf not' manuever. It's a crime of opportunity. The overhead is unlocked, I've got a second, the bag is right there, so why tf not. That's the mentality. Sure, there are very good reasons not to, but some people are idiots.
All they need is an answer to 'why tf not', i.e. a reason tf not to do it.
Now, if you lock the overheads, they go "oh, there's a reason tf not to: I can't". The opportunity no longer presents itself. They will concentrate on getting out alive without it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Evan View PostI think a bit of pre-flight briefing on the fact the, in the UNLIKELY event of an emergency evacuation, overhead compartments will be locked and inaccessible until the captain has determined that there is no longer a risk to the safety of the passengers might suffice for most people to give up that futile endeavor and get off the airplane with their lives. Sure, there will still be idiots...
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
Comment