Originally posted by Oleksiy Naumov
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
B7478 - editing advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by BaszB View PostYes indeed, just lower it slightly will do but definitely not too much.
Thank guys!
Cheers,
Vinicius
Comment
-
The first thing to say is that the expression of following the rules of JetPhotos in this regard is not correct. I read how the plane had to be centered in one of the links that appear in some topic in the forum, which, even though I searched for it today, I have not found it. I will follow the suggestion by lowering the plane a little.
Thanks for the help.
Comment
-
Dark/Underexposed rejection
This photo has been rejected by Dark / Underexposed. I consider that both visually and watching the histogram does not fit that conclusion. Any opinion will be welcome.
Thank you.
Comment
-
Hello
This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7041874 was rejected the first time by "too much or too little contrast".
I corrected the photo and it was rejected again for the same reason.
Any help to solve the rejection?
Thank you.
Comment
-
Hello,
This photo has been rejected by undersharpened (soft). https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7059115
I see the license plate (EI-DHZ) and the rest of the plane sharpened, so I ask where the problem is.
Thank you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by B7478 View PostHello,
This photo has been rejected by undersharpened (soft). https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7059115
I see the license plate (EI-DHZ) and the rest of the plane sharpened, so I ask where the problem is.
Thank you.
Comment
-
Hello,
I have always marked Air Transat aircraft with this livery as "Special Scheme": https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9220524, but in this photo there is an annotation:
Screener's comments: not a Special Scheme.
What should I do in the future?
Comment
Comment