Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pre-screen

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
    hi guys! any chance for these? [ATTACH=CONFIG]24634[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24635[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24636[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24637[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline cut off/centering/motive
    2. ok
    3. cut off
    4. borderline cut off/centering

    Comment


    • hi there dlowwa! what can i do to improve the first one and 3 and 4? a tighter crop for the tail for #3? and what about #1 and 4?

      Comment


      • also, will this be suitable? instead of #2 that is Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2985.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	956.9 KB
ID:	1035282

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
          hi there dlowwa! what can i do to improve the first one and 3 and 4? a tighter crop for the tail for #3? and what about #1 and 4?
          There is too much dead/empty space in these frames that doesn't really serve any purpose. I suppose you want to show the special sticker on the tail, but given its placement, not sure there is an angle that will work.

          Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
          also, will this be suitable? instead of #2 that is [ATTACH=CONFIG]24653[/ATTACH]
          Slightly dark/flat, but otherwise ok.

          Comment


          • Hi dlowwa! A question, do u think a 16x9 crop on the etihad tail shot will benefit against the dead space? Also could you elaborate what you meant by flat? Should I increase the exposure a bit?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
              Hi dlowwa! A question, do u think a 16x9 crop on the etihad tail shot will benefit against the dead space?
              Doubt it.

              Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
              Also could you elaborate what you meant by flat?
              Flat = low contrast.

              Comment


              • thanks! also would it classify as a biz jet since its an ACJ? (the A346)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
                  thanks! also would it classify as a biz jet since its an ACJ? (the A346)
                  Yes, you can mark this as a business jet.

                  Comment


                  • hi there guys! any chance of these 2 ? Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3566.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	454.3 KB
ID:	1039954Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3542.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.46 MB
ID:	1039955

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
                      hi there guys! any chance of these 2 ? [ATTACH=CONFIG]25324[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25325[/ATTACH]
                      1: bad centering, unlevel
                      2: borderline backlit, contrast
                      My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                      Comment


                      • ah i see, thanks! and for the unlevel, does it need CW or CCW rotiation?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
                          ah i see, thanks! and for the unlevel, does it need CW or CCW rotiation?
                          Really can't tell by looking at the horizon? Just a bit off..

                          Comment


                          • hi there guys! could i get a prescreen on the following please? also Dlowwa sorry for the late reply but ive been MIA since a while now, just saw your comment, understood and will adjust accordingly xD Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4042.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	487.4 KB
ID:	1040610

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Desert.aviation View Post
                              hi there guys! could i get a prescreen on the following please? also Dlowwa sorry for the late reply but ive been MIA since a while now, just saw your comment, understood and will adjust accordingly xD [ATTACH=CONFIG]26087[/ATTACH]
                              looks acceptable to me

                              Comment


                              • hi there guys, any chance for these?Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4191.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	622.3 KB
ID:	1040727Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4688.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	754.5 KB
ID:	1040728Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4837.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	461.1 KB
ID:	1040729

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X