Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Peter Lund - Editing Advice

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default Peter Lund - Editing Advice

    Hi guys,

    I just had a couple of photos rejected for various reasons.

    The following for being undersharpened and wrong categories. I honestly donīt remember what catagories that was tick if any since its 10days since I uploaded them. On both my screen they are well sharpened without being oversharpened or undersharp.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759290
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759289
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759288

    Thos one is just undersharp which I seem strange since itīs sharp on my screens.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759287

    I have lately had a lot rejected for undersharpened which I find strange since they are sharp on my end.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  2. #2
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi guys,

    I just had a couple of photos rejected for various reasons.

    The following for being undersharpened and wrong categories. I honestly donīt remember what catagories that was tick if any since its 10days since I uploaded them. On both my screen they are well sharpened without being oversharpened or undersharp.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759290
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759289
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759288
    These are all blurry towards the nose
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Thos one is just undersharp which I seem strange since itīs sharp on my screens.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6759287
    This one is borderline. Maybe it would be accepted on appeal.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Thanks GeDO,
    Iīll try appealling the last one.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Dear Team,

    I recently got these rejected for vignetting, however others take at the same has been accepted or rejected without vignetting being the cause.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054116
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054112
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054107
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054105

    I would also like some explanation on how to avoid "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" since that is one of the other reason I often experience.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  5. #5
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Dear Team,

    I recently got these rejected for vignetting, however others take at the same has been accepted or rejected without vignetting being the cause.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054116
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054112
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054107
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7054105

    I would also like some explanation on how to avoid "Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue)" since that is one of the other reason I often experience.
    Vignetting due to corners being of a significantly different brightness than the rest of the frame. Bad color due to all of your images being submitted with Adobe RGB 1998 as the embedded color profile. Please use sRGB instead.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Thank you for the reply.
    I am just surprised that some of the pictures had vignetting and others didnīt when they were taken in the same time periode on the same day and same equipment.

    Regarding sRGB this is something I think I found out how to do.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  7. #7
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Thank you for the reply.
    I am just surprised that some of the pictures had vignetting and others didnīt when they were taken in the same time periode on the same day and same equipment.
    Not too surprising actually, given that you seem to have been shooting with the aperture relatively wide open. Anything f/5.6 and below is more likely to show vignetting, especially when using a full-frame sensor. How much you've cropped the images will also play a factor in how much vignetting shows up. Heavy crops will obviously show less vignetting as you've effectively cut off the corners, while images with little cropping are much more likely to show it since more of the corners are there.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Not too surprising actually, given that you seem to have been shooting with the aperture relatively wide open. Anything f/5.6 and below is more likely to show vignetting, especially when using a full-frame sensor. How much you've cropped the images will also play a factor in how much vignetting shows up. Heavy crops will obviously show less vignetting as you've effectively cut off the corners, while images with little cropping are much more likely to show it since more of the corners are there.
    Thatīs true. Itīs been sometime since I edited those pictures so I canīt recall how much crop that was used in the other pictures.
    I try to shoot with f/5.6 or more.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Hi all,
    I finally managed to get some photos accepted again and a few rejected.

    I got a question to this rejection (file error and bad info)
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7289061

    The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification and is the bad info because itīs uploaded as Germanwings and not Eurowings ?

    Also, thank you for correcting my Smartwings hybrid which I had ticked off as special colours.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  10. #10
    Member jvdl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification
    Only the top half of your image loads for me. The bottom half is just white. Not sure whether it's just me or the screeners experienced the same issue.

  11. #11
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi all,
    I finally managed to get some photos accepted again and a few rejected.

    I got a question to this rejection (file error and bad info)
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7289061

    The file error I have never received before and would like soem clarification
    File is corrupted. You will need to submit it again.

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    and is the bad info because itīs uploaded as Germanwings and not Eurowings ?
    This is not a military aircraft.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Thanks, I have tried uploading again.

    I thought I had selected Civil genre, but apparently it didnīt register or I forgot.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Hi guys,

    I am almost done editing the last pictures I have.

    There are still a bunch which is as old as 4 years I still ahvenīt uploaded, but before I do so I would like to know if they are acceptable or if I need to start all over again.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B-18708c031214.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	603.2 KB 
ID:	25033Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N619AEd031214.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	642.9 KB 
ID:	25034Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N951NNf031214.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	666.9 KB 
ID:	25035Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-ABKJd260514.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	746.2 KB 
ID:	25036Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JA814Ae260514.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	726.8 KB 
ID:	25037
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  14. #14
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi guys,

    I am almost done editing the last pictures I have.

    There are still a bunch which is as old as 4 years I still ahvenīt uploaded, but before I do so I would like to know if they are acceptable or if I need to start all over again.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B-18708c031214.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	603.2 KB 
ID:	25033Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N619AEd031214.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	642.9 KB 
ID:	25034Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N951NNf031214.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	666.9 KB 
ID:	25035Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-ABKJd260514.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	746.2 KB 
ID:	25036Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JA814Ae260514.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	726.8 KB 
ID:	25037
    All images will need to be uploaded with sRGB color profile, or a color rejection may result.

    1. borderline contrast
    2-3 soft/blurry
    4. borderline contrast
    5. borderline exposure/contrast

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Hi Screeners,

    I tried to upload a picture of 9HPGS which isnīt in the database and both attempts was rejected.

    Will the picture below stand a chance which is a different angle than the 2 attempts ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9H-PGSf100619.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	25344
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  16. #16
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi Screeners,

    I tried to upload a picture of 9HPGS which isnīt in the database and both attempts was rejected.

    Will the picture below stand a chance which is a different angle than the 2 attempts ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9H-PGSf100619.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	25344
    Don't know why the others were rejected, but the contrast looks quite poor on this one.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Hi all,

    Would these two stand a chance of being accepted.
    On both occations the sun was from the back, but was playing hide and seek at the worst possible time.

    Thanks in advance.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OO-SNAb220819.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	971.8 KB 
ID:	27565Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TC-JNCb170819.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.46 MB 
ID:	27566
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  18. #18
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,810

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Lund View Post
    Hi all,

    Would these two stand a chance of being accepted.
    On both occations the sun was from the back, but was playing hide and seek at the worst possible time.

    Thanks in advance.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	OO-SNAb220819.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	971.8 KB 
ID:	27565Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TC-JNCb170819.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.46 MB 
ID:	27566
    The first with some brightening/lifting of the shadows, perhaps; the second not much chance I'm afraid.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Thank you for the feedback, I will keep them in my personal collection.
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    191

    Default

    Hi all,

    Does the one below stand a chance after the sun played hide and seek ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	SP-LNO280819.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.44 MB 
ID:	27967
    Best regards

    Peter Lund

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •