Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 55 of 55

Thread: Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

  1. #41
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Hello,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7210699

    Question about this rejection. I agree with the missing catagories, missed the Warbird check box by mistake. But Im confused about the invalid hot. I included the hot for the new decal added to the aircraft, not seen in any other photo. I have seen other photos accepted with a new or removed decal that are hot. Such as these:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088515
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088750

    Thanks in advanced!

  2. #42
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Hello,

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7210699

    Question about this rejection. I agree with the missing catagories, missed the Warbird check box by mistake. But Im confused about the invalid hot. I included the hot for the new decal added to the aircraft, not seen in any other photo. I have seen other photos accepted with a new or removed decal that are hot. Such as these:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088515
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9088750

    Thanks in advanced!
    There is no other image of that side of the aircraft, so there is no need to accept it as hot since there is nothing to update. The two images you reference had previous versions that showed a clear difference to the updated image.

  3. #43
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Looking to give this shot another go with this new edit. How does this edit look? Any improvements or suggestions?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0178.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	127.2 KB 
ID:	23104

  4. #44
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Looking to give this shot another go with this new edit. How does this edit look? Any improvements or suggestions?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0178.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	127.2 KB 
ID:	23104
    Image is blurry and heavily compressed.

  5. #45
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Is is possible to somehow fix those? Or is the image just too blurry? Not sure exactly how to fix the compression issue.

  6. #46
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Is is possible to somehow fix those? Or is the image just too blurry? Not sure exactly how to fix the compression issue.
    If the original is blurry, there is no way to fix it. Compression can be addressed by modifying your save settings so that the jpeg quality is at maximum.

  7. #47
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Looking for some clarification on this photo rejection. Looking to resubmit it.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7221628

    Im curious about all of them actually. The photo was cropped this way to include the C-5 and the F-16 in the same photo, which I think is a very cool composition. Do I just need to make the C-5 as close to the top as I can or does the F-16 itself need to be centered?

    Second was the missing/wrong categories. Not sure what was missing from this one.

    And finally the invalid hot. I added the hot due to this being the first photo with the number 6 on this jet. Used to be TB1. Ive had other photos with small changes like that get accepted for hot.

    Thanks in advanced.

  8. #48
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Looking for some clarification on this photo rejection. Looking to resubmit it.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7221628

    Im curious about all of them actually. The photo was cropped this way to include the C-5 and the F-16 in the same photo, which I think is a very cool composition. Do I just need to make the C-5 as close to the top as I can or does the F-16 itself need to be centered?

    Second was the missing/wrong categories. Not sure what was missing from this one.

    And finally the invalid hot. I added the hot due to this being the first photo with the number 6 on this jet. Used to be TB1. Ive had other photos with small changes like that get accepted for hot.

    Thanks in advanced.
    No specific categories apply to this aircraft; if none were selected, then it might be worth an appeal as the other rejection reasons weren't appropriate, imho.

  9. #49
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No specific categories apply to this aircraft; if none were selected, then it might be worth an appeal as the other rejection reasons weren't appropriate, imho.
    Also, before any future appeals, please be sure to read here thoroughly, especially #8:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

  10. #50
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Oh, thanks. I should double check on all of these.

    May I make a suggestion, sense there is a lot of information and specific rules for uploading, pre screening, appealing, etc. Maybe when members join, then get an email with links to all these different forms. So they have all the information handed to them because I personally was unaware that a lot of these posts with rules existed. Think it would be good help for everyone and possibly bring down the number of posts/appeals that break the rules.

  11. #51
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Hello,

    Confused by these rejections. All 3 got rejected for over processed and bad color. I dont understand how the over processed rejection is valid as I dont see any signs of over processing. Plus the color looks fine on all the photos imo.

    Thanks in advanced.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235007
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235000
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7234998

  12. #52
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Hello,

    Confused by these rejections. All 3 got rejected for over processed and bad color. I dont understand how the over processed rejection is valid as I dont see any signs of over processing. Plus the color looks fine on all the photos imo.

    Thanks in advanced.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235007
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235000
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7234998
    It appears a filter was used, either physically, or in post processing. The former is allowed, but the latter is not. If the former, you can contact me via DM to send an original copy to confirm, and I will have the images accepted. If the latter, please know such bad editing is not permitted.

  13. #53
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,713

    Default

    Thanks for sending the files. I can confirm after comparing the raw files to the ones you uploaded that the editing you did indeed changed the images significantly enough that I think an overprocessed rejection was an appropriate rejection reason. The skies in all of the images are darker and more saturated than the original files, while the rest of the frame is little changed. If you're using features like clarity, dehaze, or shadow/highlight to achieve this effect, I'd recommend avoiding their use with future uploads.

  14. #54
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Took this on my recent trip, not sure if this could be accepted. Thoughts?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2003.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	651.3 KB 
ID:	25720

  15. #55
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,407

    Default

    Hi,
    Colors and contrast are the main issue

    Regards
    Alex

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •