Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

  1. #1
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default Rejected photos time

    Question,

    There seems to be conflicting information. In the rejection photos page, it says 14 days they will remain, but if I click on the photo, it says 7 days. Can that be clarified.

  2. #2
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Question,

    There seems to be conflicting information. In the rejection photos page, it says 14 days they will remain, but if I click on the photo, it says 7 days. Can that be clarified.
    14 days from when the image was rejected.

  3. #3
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default Pre Screening/Editing Advise

    I have this photo in the queue, it was shot through a window at Beijing, and it has these lines you can see if you check for dust but you cant see them when you just look at the photo.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901386

    Also would like a pre screening of this one too cause im on the fence about a few things with this.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901388

    Thanks all.

  4. #4
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    I have this photo in the queue, it was shot through a window at Beijing, and it has these lines you can see if you check for dust but you cant see them when you just look at the photo.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901386

    Also would like a pre screening of this one too cause im on the fence about a few things with this.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901388

    Thanks all.
    Images already in the queue will not be prescreened.

  5. #5
    Member Jordan Williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Palmerston North, New Zealand
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    I have this photo in the queue, it was shot through a window at Beijing, and it has these lines you can see if you check for dust but you cant see them when you just look at the photo.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901386

    Also would like a pre screening of this one too cause im on the fence about a few things with this.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6901388

    Thanks all.
    Im not a screener/crew member however the first image seems like it may have some minor contrasting issues (if any) and the second looks to be soft, this is just my take on it and I could very well be wrong so I'd suggest removing both from the queue and re-requesting pre-screening advice from a screener or crew member.

    Kindest Regards and best wishes,
    Jordan

  6. #6
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

    Hello,

    Starting up this thread like I have seen others do. How does this photo look?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9508.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	19717

  7. #7
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Hello,

    Starting up this thread like I have seen others do. How does this photo look?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9508.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	19717
    Looks OK here.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Both would be rejected for soft, and first for contrast as well.

  9. #9
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default Would like some clarification on rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6879830

    I recently got this rejected, and I am confused by some of the rejections.

    I don't really get the over processed rejection as dont see the over editing which usually shows when checking for dust. Would love to get advise so I can try and fix it.

    And I was confused on the category one. I recall checking cargo for this aircraft, but apparently something else was missing.

    Thanks

  10. #10
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Even though I haven't screened your pic, from what I can see, yhere are some halos visible arount the tree line in the background and you probably have used too much noise reduction hence it is overprocessed.

    The reg and rear section of the fuselage is bit blurry (I could have added soft too) and about the categories, if you say you heve checked cardo then you must have missed Night Shot (haven't screened it so not 100% sure about that).

    I hope I have helped you.

    Sotiris

  11. #11
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,872

    Default

    Definite haloes around the front, upper rear fuselage and treeline/horizon. Required categories are Night shot and cargo.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  12. #12
    Junior Member Runway28L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    48

    Default

    I'll second Sotos' and Brian's opinions. Whole aircraft looks blurry and there's haloing around the treeline and parts of the aircraft.

  13. #13
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Thanks for that guys! Ill try it again maybe sometime.

    Quote Originally Posted by brianw999 View Post
    Required categories are Night shot and cargo.
    I am confused with this though. Why would I categorize it as a night shot when the sun was up?

  14. #14
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Thanks for that guys! Ill try it again maybe sometime.



    I am confused with this though. Why would I categorize it as a night shot when the sun was up?
    I suggest you take a look at Upload Guidelines before anything else.

    2.2 Categories - Night Shots

    "This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows."

    Seems to describe the conditions in your image pretty well, doesn't it?

  15. #15
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Interesting. Good to know. Thanks

  16. #16
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0175.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	20045

    How does this photo look? I am worried cause theres a big spike in the histogram for the bright side, but it clearly doesnt look over exposed. Thanks in advance!

  17. #17
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0175.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	1.07 MB 
ID:	20045

    How does this photo look? I am worried cause theres a big spike in the histogram for the bright side, but it clearly doesnt look over exposed. Thanks in advance!
    Soft, and borderline for contrast.

  18. #18
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0056.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	570.0 KB 
ID:	20115

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0089.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	733.2 KB 
ID:	20116

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0116.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	700.1 KB 
ID:	20117

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6543.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	20118

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6583.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.32 MB 
ID:	20119

  19. #19
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,689

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0056.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	570.0 KB 
ID:	20115

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0089.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	733.2 KB 
ID:	20116

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0116.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	700.1 KB 
ID:	20117

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6543.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.38 MB 
ID:	20118

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6583.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.32 MB 
ID:	20119
    1-3 soft/blurry, overprocessed
    4. ok
    5. borderline soft

  20. #20
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Would this one get rejected for obstruction due to the loader on the back? (This is not edited for a jetphotos upload)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1449.jpg 
Views:	35 
Size:	310.5 KB 
ID:	20480

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •