Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 55

Thread: Nicholas Hesler/NickFlightX - Editing Advise

  1. #21
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Would this one get rejected for obstruction due to the loader on the back? (This is not edited for a jetphotos upload)

    Attachment 20480
    Most likely yes, since it is avoidable with better timing.

  2. #22
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7640.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.41 MB 
ID:	20570
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7650.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1,024.0 KB 
ID:	20571
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8861.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	666.6 KB 
ID:	20572
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7749.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	20573
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7795.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1,014.3 KB 
ID:	20574

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7640.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.41 MB 
ID:	20570
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7650.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1,024.0 KB 
ID:	20571
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8861.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	666.6 KB 
ID:	20572
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7749.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	20573
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7795.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1,014.3 KB 
ID:	20574
    1 looks acceptable, 2 and 3 are a bit dark, 4 and 5 look acceptable

  4. #24
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How does this photo look?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2282.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	728.2 KB 
ID:	20880

  5. #25
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How does this photo look?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2282.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	728.2 KB 
ID:	20880
    Quality looks fine.

  6. #26
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7034787

    I got this rejected recently, and I am confused with the rejection. While the airplane is not very well lit, it is not back lit by definition. If you look at the taxiway center line, you can see that most of the shadow is on the far side of the center line, which shows that the plane is not back lit by definition. I appealed this a good time ago and haven't heard back which is why I am asking here.

    Thanks

  7. #27
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    you could be right, not technically backlit by definition but like the senior replied to your appeal "fuselage is not well lit, correctly rejected" which I agree with. for such front lit shot of such a common aircraft I recommend you wait for a better chance

    Regards
    Alex

  8. #28
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How does this photo look? Taken from an old camera, so not the best quality out there. Also, I am having trouble with uploading this pic. The airport, E16, does not appear to be in the data base. Cant find it anywhere.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01934.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	465.9 KB 
ID:	21267

  9. #29
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How does this photo look? Taken from an old camera, so not the best quality out there. Also, I am having trouble with uploading this pic. The airport, E16, does not appear to be in the data base. Cant find it anywhere.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC01934.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	465.9 KB 
ID:	21267
    Some compression/oversharpening, but otherwise ok.

  10. #30
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    I am trying to upload the photo from the last post I made, but the airport is entered wrong into the database. Right now, it is entered into the database as "San Martin/South County - Q99" and has the country of "Wake Island". The upload page simply wont let me change the country to USA - California, it has already caused me a rejection. Further more, the airport now has the name/code of: "San Martin - E16". Any chance this can get fixed so I would be able to upload the photo?

  11. #31
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Had this photo rejected twice now for contrast. Can I get some opinion on what I should do to make this acceptable? First one was over contrast I could tell, but I have no idea for the second one. Can the rejection be changed to say which one it is, like a rejection for too much contrast and a rejection for to little contrast? This is by far the most common rejection I get and I am almost always confused as to which it is.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7151519
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152333

  12. #32
    JetPhotos.Net Crew meneses24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Josť, Costa Rica
    Posts
    616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Had this photo rejected twice now for contrast. Can I get some opinion on what I should do to make this acceptable? First one was over contrast I could tell, but I have no idea for the second one. Can the rejection be changed to say which one it is, like a rejection for too much contrast and a rejection for to little contrast? This is by far the most common rejection I get and I am almost always confused as to which it is.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7151519
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7152333
    Hi Nick,

    I didn't screen this pictures but unfortunately the high cloud layer leads to a trouble for contrast, while the plane looks good, the sky looks blown away, that's why you are getting the contrast rejection. It's leaning towards an overexposed rejection reason too. Do you have its raw file available? I can help you out if you have it

  13. #33
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Thanks for offering to help.

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1our...ew?usp=sharing

    I dont have a raw, mainly because it was taken on an iPhone (normally dont do this). Have gotten a few up in the past.

  14. #34
    Administrator Alex - Spot-This !'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    4,414

    Default

    one for the personal collection definitely

    Regard
    Alex

  15. #35
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4020.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	22271
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4445.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	527.4 KB 
ID:	22272
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4506.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	539.0 KB 
ID:	22273
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5108.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	593.1 KB 
ID:	22274

  16. #36
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How do these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4020.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	22271
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4445.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	527.4 KB 
ID:	22272
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4506.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	539.0 KB 
ID:	22273
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5108.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	593.1 KB 
ID:	22274
    1. borderline dark
    2. borderline contrast
    3. contrast
    4. ok

  17. #37
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    How does these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4548.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	854.0 KB 
ID:	22605
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4567.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	916.8 KB 
ID:	22606
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4632.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	848.3 KB 
ID:	22607
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4670.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	940.9 KB 
ID:	22608
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4738.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	755.5 KB 
ID:	22609

  18. #38
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    How does these photos look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4548.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	854.0 KB 
ID:	22605
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4567.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	916.8 KB 
ID:	22606
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4632.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	848.3 KB 
ID:	22607
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4670.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	940.9 KB 
ID:	22608
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4738.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	755.5 KB 
ID:	22609
    1-2 ok
    3 vignetting/obstruction (top right)
    4 ok
    5 borderline overexposed (buildings)

  19. #39
    Junior Member nickflightx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    San Jose
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Thanks guys for all the great feedback!

    How does this shot here look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4776.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	22804

  20. #40
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nickflightx View Post
    Thanks guys for all the great feedback!

    How does this shot here look?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4776.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.33 MB 
ID:	22804
    Hi, please read here, especially #2

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •