Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: Budget camera buying advice

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default Budget camera buying advice

    Hi everyone,
    I am currently looking at upgrading my camera from a Nikon D50 to something a little better. I am looking for a Body for under 300.
    I want to move away from Nikon due to the lens compatibility (AF-S for newer bodies = more expensive lenses). I am particularly grasped by Canon bodies. I have the following options -
    Canon 100D/SL1 ~
    Canon 1300D/T6 ~ 300
    Sony A68 ~
    Nikon D7100 ~
    Canon 7D ~ 420
    [All including lenses]

    Here's a speadsheet with the specs on https://www.dpreview.com/products/co...tDir=ascending

    Despite being older the 7D is very convincing. If you have any suggestions, or comments or even own/ed one of these then please feel free to let me know.

    Cheers
    Adam
    Last edited by Adam Quinn; 01-20-2019 at 07:41 PM. Reason: Prices include lenses now

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Mirror reflex are technically survivals of the film era, coming from the last century.
    If you start from a blank page, look at the future : mirrorless cams (Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Leica, Hasselblad, Sigma, Fuji... Canon or Nikon who are trying to get on the band wagon with stratospheric prices) give less weight, smaller stuff, affordable prices and much greater possibilities. For Panasonic and Olympus, the "Micro 4/3" standard offers a very large range of lenses.

  3. #3
    Member CrosswindPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Toronto, Moncton
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Look for a used Canon Rebel or, as you mentioned, get the 7D. I use one and it is fantastic.
    Or a used 5D Mk II (my dad uses one and it produces fantastic photos for its age.)

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Look at used cameras/refurbs. I got my two lense D3400 kit for $300 less than the price of a new one by going with a refurbished camera. They work just like new and if there is something wrong with it they will usually tell you.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zomeu View Post
    Mirror reflex are technically survivals of the film era, coming from the last century.
    If you start from a blank page, look at the future : mirrorless cams (Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Leica, Hasselblad, Sigma, Fuji... Canon or Nikon who are trying to get on the band wagon with stratospheric prices) give less weight, smaller stuff, affordable prices and much greater possibilities. For Panasonic and Olympus, the "Micro 4/3" standard offers a very large range of lenses.
    Mirrorless lenses don't have viewfinders, correct?

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrosswindPhoto View Post
    Look for a used Canon Rebel or, as you mentioned, get the 7D. I use one and it is fantastic.
    Or a used 5D Mk II (my dad uses one and it produces fantastic photos for its age.)
    I does look incredibly good. I'd rather go used and pay less and get better quality out, I don't see the benefit in paying 200 more and knowing it's brand new, my camera is nearly 14 years old and it still works, the 7D also boasts a variety of extras such as 19 focus points to 9, waterproof, 8 fps continuous. As for the 5D it is 200 more than I'm looking at unfortunately.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Rodeback View Post
    Look at used cameras/refurbs. I got my two lense D3400 kit for $300 less than the price of a new one by going with a refurbished camera. They work just like new and if there is something wrong with it they will usually tell you.
    I certainly wouldn't go new, everything seems overpriced when you look at used. That 1300D is actually 320 for 18-55mm lens and a 70-300mm lens.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    21

    Default

    "Mirrorless lenses don't have viewfinders, correct?"

    False, obviously. Hard prejudices are hard to kill...
    The most recent electronic viewfinders give better images than optical ones, they allow keeping a constant view during bursts with tracking focus, they allow to see the image even in very low light and give all the informations about settings.
    Mirrorless systems offer generally five axis stabilization of body AND lens, which is impossible with reflex. The benefit can be around five or six stops. An Olympus OM-D EM1 MkII can shoot at 1/2 sec handheld without any waste.
    Inform you, try it yourself (Sony Alpha 7R-III for example, or Panasonic G9 or Olympus EM-1 II or EM-10 III...)
    To try is to adopt, and anyway within the five or six coming years, no mechanic mirror reflex will be produced anymore, even by Nikon or Canon.

    https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Comp...50___1187_1177

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Canada (ON)
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    ...the 7D also boasts a variety of extras such as 19 focus points to 9, waterproof, 8 fps continuous...
    The 7D should also have a bigger buffer size than the other Canons you listed, which would come in handy if you wanted to shoot RAW continuous.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zomeu View Post
    "Mirrorless lenses don't have viewfinders, correct?"

    False, obviously. Hard prejudices are hard to kill...
    The most recent electronic viewfinders give better images than optical ones, they allow keeping a constant view during bursts with tracking focus, they allow to see the image even in very low light and give all the informations about settings.
    Mirrorless systems offer generally five axis stabilization of body AND lens, which is impossible with reflex. The benefit can be around five or six stops. An Olympus OM-D EM1 MkII can shoot at 1/2 sec handheld without any waste.
    Inform you, try it yourself (Sony Alpha 7R-III for example, or Panasonic G9 or Olympus EM-1 II or EM-10 III...)
    To try is to adopt, and anyway within the five or six coming years, no mechanic mirror reflex will be produced anymore, even by Nikon or Canon.

    https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Comp...50___1187_1177
    I think given current prices it may well be my next camera, when a camera says continous 3fps, does that mean at 1/100th of a second it will do 3 1/100 shots in a second then stop? My current camera is 2.5fps and I've no idea what that means, it seems clear that highers fps is better for sport photography.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    The 7D should also have a bigger buffer size than the other Canons you listed, which would come in handy if you wanted to shoot RAW continuous.
    Bigger buffer size?

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Canada (ON)
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    I think given current prices it may well be my next camera, when a camera says continous 3fps, does that mean at 1/100th of a second it will do 3 1/100 shots in a second then stop? My current camera is 2.5fps and I've no idea what that means, it seems clear that highers fps is better for sport photography.
    It is how many photos the camera can take in second. It can't necessarily be maintained continuously because of memory limitations (buffer size and memory card write speed). When shooting an aircraft in motion, for example, it can be advantageous to have the ability to get more shots. Higher FPS lets you do that.

    Edit: and oh yeah, if the shutter speed is set quite slow (long exposure for example) then the advertised max FPS will, of course, be impossible to achieve.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Canada (ON)
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    Bigger buffer size?
    It's internal camera memory. It's where pictures go after you've captured them but before they have been written to the memory card. Buffer size is important because if you are shooting at a high rate (high FPS) and large file size, you may be creating data at a faster rate than can be written to the memory card. Bigger buffer means more seconds of shooting before it's full and the camera can't take any more pictures.

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    It is how many photos the camera can take in second. It can't necessarily be maintained continuously because of memory limitations (buffer size and memory card write speed). When shooting an aircraft in motion, for example, it can be advantageous to have the ability to get more shots. Higher FPS lets you do that.

    Edit: and oh yeah, if the shutter speed is set quite slow (long exposure for example) then the advertised max FPS will, of course, be impossible to achieve.
    So lets say I shoot 1/250th and camera has 8fps continuous, the camera will shoot for 1 or 2 seconds, theoretically? I just want to be able to get burst shots, with my camera now I can get a shot on rotation, a shot parallel and a shot from behind, I wish I could get 5 or 6 shots from the aircraft moving from rotation to past me, hard to describe what I mean...

    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    It's internal camera memory. It's where pictures go after you've captured them but before they have been written to the memory card. Buffer size is important because if you are shooting at a high rate (high FPS) and large file size, you may be creating data at a faster rate than can be written to the memory card. Bigger buffer means more seconds of shooting before it's full and the camera can't take any more pictures.
    So the 7D has a considerable higher buffer speed?

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Canada (ON)
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    So lets say I shoot 1/250th and camera has 8fps continuous, the camera will shoot for 1 or 2 seconds, theoretically?
    1/250 isn't slow enough to limit burst speed, it would take a shutter speed closer to 1/8. FPS is a mechanical thing with the shutter and mirror, the camera should be able to sustain it indefinitely, but you would run into memory issues (buffer and card write) within a second or a few depending on file size.

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    I just want to be able to get burst shots, with my camera now I can get a shot on rotation, a shot parallel and a shot from behind, I wish I could get 5 or 6 shots from the aircraft moving from rotation to past me, hard to describe what I mean...
    That's perfectly clear. I photographed an aircraft landing the other day and ended up with 35 shots. At any rate, more fps and a bigger buffer size is just what's needed for that type of application.

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Quinn View Post
    So the 7D has a considerable higher buffer speed?
    The 7D has twice the speed (fps) and twice the buffer size of the 100D or 1300D.

  16. #16
    Administrator seahawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany - near DUS
    Posts
    7,789

    Default

    Considering that you might have some lenses for Nikon, I would go with a used Nikon. A D300, D7000, D7100 would probably work well and they all handle non AF-S lenses.

    https://www.lcegroup.co.uk/Used/Niko...dy_231706.html

    Or if you can save on lenses:

    https://www.lcegroup.co.uk/Used/Niko...ed_232794.html

  17. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seahawk View Post
    Considering that you might have some lenses for Nikon, I would go with a used Nikon. A D300, D7000, D7100 would probably work well and they all handle non AF-S lenses.
    I have a Tamron 55-200mm AF lens which I'd probably want to replace with a Nikon 300mm lens, but the D7100 looks very good despite being slightly more expensive.

    I must say that it is very close between the 7D and D7100

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    1/250 isn't slow enough to limit burst speed, it would take a shutter speed closer to 1/8. FPS is a mechanical thing with the shutter and mirror, the camera should be able to sustain it indefinitely, but you would run into memory issues (buffer and card write) within a second or a few depending on file size.
    The 7D uses a different storage type, write speeds are 160mb/s+ compared to SD cards 60mb/s, I know both are quite capable but still a difference. When I shoot to get motion blur (panning) I daren't go below 1/80, I tried 1/25 before and ended up with 300 unusable shots.


    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    That's perfectly clear. I photographed an aircraft landing the other day and ended up with 35 shots. At any rate, more fps and a bigger buffer size is just what's needed for that type of application.
    I'll keep that noted.


    Quote Originally Posted by Quebec Golf View Post
    The 7D has twice the speed (fps) and twice the buffer size of the 100D or 1300D.
    Clearly better then

  19. #19
    Senior Member brianw999's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent. UK.
    Posts
    11,840

    Default

    If you can get a D7100 for 430 with a lens then I would say “take their fingers off”. I have a D7200 and am very happy with the image quality.
    If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !


  20. #20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •