Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 103

Thread: [Editing advice] Pre-screening

  1. #81
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Hello. Recently I got a photo of a private aircraft which has not been shown on JP before. But the quality may not be perfect. Should I upload it or not? Thanks for the advice.
    Attachment 23092
    Highlights might be blown out on nose, but otherwise quality should be ok for new reg.

  2. #82
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi I have 1 rejected photos here.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7212844
    I think maybe the exposure is not too bad to accept. Thanks

  3. #83
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Hi I have 1 rejected photos here.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7212844
    I think maybe the exposure is not too bad to accept. Thanks
    Agree, maybe a touch soft, but exposure looks acceptable.

  4. #84
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Agree, maybe a touch soft, but exposure looks acceptable.
    Thanks I have appealed that, still waiting for result

  5. #85
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi I have one rejection because of "poor contrast"
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7212594
    Comparing with photos which I uploaded the same day, the contrast for this one is a bit low, while I think maybe the quality overall is acceptable. Thanks.

  6. #86
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Hi I have one rejection because of "poor contrast"
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7212594
    Comparing with photos which I uploaded the same day, the contrast for this one is a bit low, while I think maybe the quality overall is acceptable. Thanks.
    Yeah, I pretty much agree. Overall quality is not too bad, but the contrast is a bit flat.

  7. #87
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yeah, I pretty much agree. Overall quality is not too bad, but the contrast is a bit flat.
    Should I appeal that?

  8. #88
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yeah, I pretty much agree. Overall quality is not too bad, but the contrast is a bit flat.
    Ok never mind, It has been rejected again. I have to do better next time XD

  9. #89
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi what you think about this one. The background is a bit dark but luckily the bird itself is bright. While I am still worried about if the image is too noisy and soft. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3274.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	415.6 KB 
ID:	23508

  10. #90
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Also this one. Thanks again!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3205.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	394.3 KB 
ID:	23509

  11. #91
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Hi what you think about this one. The background is a bit dark but luckily the bird itself is bright. While I am still worried about if the image is too noisy and soft. Thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3274.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	415.6 KB 
ID:	23508
    Soft.

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Also this one. Thanks again!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3205.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	394.3 KB 
ID:	23509
    A bit dark, but otherwise ok.

  12. #92
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi I have a question, is the Star Alliance livery be considered as special scheme? Thanks.

  13. #93
    Member MarkLawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    211

    Default

    Yes.

  14. #94
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Hi should i appeal this. I am sure that I correct the photo infomation to special scheme.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7231242
    for the sharpness i am not sure.

  15. #95
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Hi should i appeal this. I am sure that I correct the photo infomation to special scheme.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7231242
    for the sharpness i am not sure.
    Did you read the screening email?

  16. #96
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Did you read the screening email?
    Yeah I forgot to say that It shouldnt be night shoot... I took this photo ar 6:05 pm that day. BTW one of the photo I took after this one has been accepted. So I dont think this is A NIGHT SHOT. Thank you.

  17. #97
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Yeah I forgot to say that It shouldnt be night shoot... I took this photo ar 6:05 pm that day. BTW one of the photo I took after this one has been accepted. So I dont think this is A NIGHT SHOT. Thank you.
    You're welcome to your opinion of course, but it might be a good idea to listen to someone who actually screens the images and knows the guidelines. To point, you might want to read here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version

    2.2 Categories

    Night Shots
    This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows.

    This describes your image exactly.

  18. #98
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    You're welcome to your opinion of course, but it might be a good idea to listen to someone who actually screens the images and knows the guidelines. To point, you might want to read here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version

    2.2 Categories

    Night Shots
    This category should apply for photos taken at dawn, dusk and night. For Dusk and Dawn photos these should show a red-orange glow and long shadows.

    This describes your image exactly.
    Sure I will take that. So is there any major issues of this photo?c Also I have A another image in Q so if it is a "night shot" I will correct the information. I know I cannot pre-screen the photo in Q but I just want to double check if the information is right.(rejected by the wrong category is really stupid haha). Thanks again.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235124

  19. #99
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    5,613

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walker_Xu View Post
    Sure I will take that. So is there any major issues of this photo?c Also I have A another image in Q so if it is a "night shot" I will correct the information. I know I cannot pre-screen the photo in Q but I just want to double check if the information is right.(rejected by the wrong category is really stupid haha). Thanks again.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7235124
    Yes, you can use 'Night Shot' here. If unsure, just leave a message to the screeners with future uploads, and we will almost always correct the category for you if there are no other problems.

  20. #100
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    68

    Default

    Got some first registrations today. However the Vignette is strange and I dont know if they are acceptable.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3397.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	369.2 KB 
ID:	23755
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	_DSC3403.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	382.5 KB 
ID:	23756

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •