Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
paoloz99 - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by paoloz99 View PostThank you for your advice
I tried to edit this other slightlty different Air Italy A330 pic, could you tell me if it can be accettable? I added more sharpness ad modified a little bit contrast that in the previous one seemed a little bit poor to me
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22090[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Hi
I would like to ask you if I uploaded 2 pics of the same aircraft, with the same registration, taken the same day, but one is a closeup that shows mostly the front of the aircraft whereas the other one is a classic pic of the plane taxiing, would a pic be rejected because it is considered similar?
Thank you in advance for your reply
Comment
-
Originally posted by paoloz99 View PostHi
I would like to ask you if I uploaded 2 pics of the same aircraft, with the same registration, taken the same day, but one is a closeup that shows mostly the front of the aircraft whereas the other one is a classic pic of the plane taxiing, would a pic be rejected because it is considered similar?
Thank you in advance for your reply
Comment
-
Originally posted by paoloz99 View PostHi!
Could you tell me whether this pic taken after the sun went down can be accettable as night shot?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]28548[/ATTACH]
Thank you in advance
Comment
-
Hi,
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I had this pic rejected for bad info, to be more precise according to the screener the date is supposed to be wrong. I've appealed for the photo since the date is correct but the appeal has been rejected and the screener this time told me that the aircraft landed on 29th instead of the 30th which was the date i put.
As you can see from the pic I've attached below according to flightradar24 the aircraft departed from LAX at 10.08 pm on 29th September and arrived at MXP at 5.31 pm the following day, so on 30th. Then it departed bound for LUX always on the 30th at 6.40 pm and landed at 8.41 pm.
There is also this pic that was accepted and which was taken the same day I took mine
LX-ECV. Boeing 747-4HQERF. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
So please, could you accept this pic? It's pretty clear that the aircraft landed on 30th...
Best Regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by paoloz99 View PostHi,
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I had this pic rejected for bad info, to be more precise according to the screener the date is supposed to be wrong. I've appealed for the photo since the date is correct but the appeal has been rejected and the screener this time told me that the aircraft landed on 29th instead of the 30th which was the date i put.
As you can see from the pic I've attached below according to flightradar24 the aircraft departed from LAX at 10.08 pm on 29th September and arrived at MXP at 5.31 pm the following day, so on 30th. Then it departed bound for LUX always on the 30th at 6.40 pm and landed at 8.41 pm.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29129[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29130[/ATTACH]
There is also this pic that was accepted and which was taken the same day I took mine
LX-ECV. Boeing 747-4HQERF. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
So please, could you accept this pic? It's pretty clear that the aircraft landed on 30th...
Best Regards
Comment
-
-
I would try and increase the whites a bit to brighten it, you might also want to try reducing green as body has a tinge to it - that might whiten it up a little more. Also be aware that part of aircraft body is in shade and may get rejected on that score. Perhaps also play around with white balance, perhaps increase it a bit
Comment
Comment