Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

paoloz99 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Thank you for your advice
    I tried to edit this other slightlty different Air Italy A330 pic, could you tell me if it can be accettable? I added more sharpness ad modified a little bit contrast that in the previous one seemed a little bit poor to me

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0451 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	430.1 KB
ID:	1033173

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by paoloz99 View Post
      Thank you for your advice
      I tried to edit this other slightlty different Air Italy A330 pic, could you tell me if it can be accettable? I added more sharpness ad modified a little bit contrast that in the previous one seemed a little bit poor to me

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22090[/ATTACH]
      Likely a rejection for soft and dark/contrast.

      Comment


      • #33
        Hi
        I would like to ask you if I uploaded 2 pics of the same aircraft, with the same registration, taken the same day, but one is a closeup that shows mostly the front of the aircraft whereas the other one is a classic pic of the plane taxiing, would a pic be rejected because it is considered similar?
        Thank you in advance for your reply

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by paoloz99 View Post
          Hi
          I would like to ask you if I uploaded 2 pics of the same aircraft, with the same registration, taken the same day, but one is a closeup that shows mostly the front of the aircraft whereas the other one is a classic pic of the plane taxiing, would a pic be rejected because it is considered similar?
          Thank you in advance for your reply
          If same side, yes.

          Comment


          • #35
            Hi, Do you think this pic could be accettable?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0173.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	693.2 KB
ID:	1033853

            Comment


            • #36
              Sky looks compressed (pixels visible) but except that it should be ok

              regards
              Alex

              Comment


              • #37
                Thank you! What about also this one?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0031 3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.3 KB
ID:	1033861

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by paoloz99 View Post
                  Thank you! What about also this one?

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]22906[/ATTACH]
                  Borderline oversharpened.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Hi!
                    Could you tell me whether this pic taken after the sun went down can be accettable as night shot?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0497 339 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	299.2 KB
ID:	1042689

                    Thank you in advance

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by paoloz99 View Post
                      Hi!
                      Could you tell me whether this pic taken after the sun went down can be accettable as night shot?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]28548[/ATTACH]

                      Thank you in advance
                      Yes Night Shot, but not really worth submitting, as it will certainly be rejected for contrast.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hi,
                        JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                        I had this pic rejected for bad info, to be more precise according to the screener the date is supposed to be wrong. I've appealed for the photo since the date is correct but the appeal has been rejected and the screener this time told me that the aircraft landed on 29th instead of the 30th which was the date i put.
                        As you can see from the pic I've attached below according to flightradar24 the aircraft departed from LAX at 10.08 pm on 29th September and arrived at MXP at 5.31 pm the following day, so on 30th. Then it departed bound for LUX always on the 30th at 6.40 pm and landed at 8.41 pm.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20191008-150012_Flightradar24.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	368.6 KB
ID:	1043183

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20191008-150018_Flightradar24.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	366.6 KB
ID:	1043184

                        There is also this pic that was accepted and which was taken the same day I took mine

                        LX-ECV. Boeing 747-4HQERF. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                        So please, could you accept this pic? It's pretty clear that the aircraft landed on 30th...

                        Best Regards

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by paoloz99 View Post
                          Hi,
                          JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                          I had this pic rejected for bad info, to be more precise according to the screener the date is supposed to be wrong. I've appealed for the photo since the date is correct but the appeal has been rejected and the screener this time told me that the aircraft landed on 29th instead of the 30th which was the date i put.
                          As you can see from the pic I've attached below according to flightradar24 the aircraft departed from LAX at 10.08 pm on 29th September and arrived at MXP at 5.31 pm the following day, so on 30th. Then it departed bound for LUX always on the 30th at 6.40 pm and landed at 8.41 pm.

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]29129[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]29130[/ATTACH]

                          There is also this pic that was accepted and which was taken the same day I took mine

                          LX-ECV. Boeing 747-4HQERF. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                          So please, could you accept this pic? It's pretty clear that the aircraft landed on 30th...

                          Best Regards
                          Looks like someone forgot to take into account difference in time zones/date change. Image has been accepted now. In the future please come here to the forum before appealing.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                            Looks like someone forgot to take into account difference in time zones/date change. Image has been accepted now. In the future please come here to the forum before appealing.
                            Ok I will
                            Thank you so much!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hi
                              Could you tell me if this pic can be accettable or not?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0221.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.1 KB
ID:	1043515

                              Thank you in advance

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I would try and increase the whites a bit to brighten it, you might also want to try reducing green as body has a tinge to it - that might whiten it up a little more. Also be aware that part of aircraft body is in shade and may get rejected on that score. Perhaps also play around with white balance, perhaps increase it a bit

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X