Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 147

Thread: ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

  1. #121
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    You can request as many times as you'd like, keeping in mind no one is under any obligation to answer. We (I) do this on our own time, and for various reasons (both intentional and unintentional) sometimes requests will go unanswered.
    I see, thank you for your time/help

  2. #122
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Hello, not a prescreen request so I don’t know if I should post here but I cannot find this rejected photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7493573

    It has only been 4 days since rejection, and I never got a email on my appeal.
    It doesn’t show in my rejected photos or my photo stats.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1751F3BC-A1BE-40C2-8E04-2CCB47EE8CD6.jpeg 
Views:	18 
Size:	117.9 KB 
ID:	27453
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FBA17B8B-1778-4210-8495-627B360A996B.jpeg 
Views:	16 
Size:	145.7 KB 
ID:	27454

  3. #123
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, not a prescreen request so I don’t know if I should post here but I cannot find this rejected photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7493573

    It has only been 4 days since rejection, and I never got a email on my appeal.
    It doesn’t show in my rejected photos or my photo stats.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1751F3BC-A1BE-40C2-8E04-2CCB47EE8CD6.jpeg 
Views:	18 
Size:	117.9 KB 
ID:	27453
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FBA17B8B-1778-4210-8495-627B360A996B.jpeg 
Views:	16 
Size:	145.7 KB 
ID:	27454
    Unfortunately can't see anything at that link. Likely a system bug, so might need to upload the image again.

  4. #124
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Unfortunately can't see anything at that link. Likely a system bug, so might need to upload the image again.
    I see, thanks, so I’m assuming that my appeal didn’t go through either?

  5. #125
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    I see, thanks, so I’m assuming that my appeal didn’t go through either?
    Didn't see any appeal, no. Again, likely due to system bug, otherwise there would be some evidence of it being screened.

  6. #126
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Didn't see any appeal, no. Again, likely due to system bug, otherwise there would be some evidence of it being screened.
    Okay, I'll resubmit thanks for the help

  7. #127
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    hello, may i have a prescreen?
    old shots that i never went back and tried to fix

    are both of them still soft?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	blxc.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	611.4 KB 
ID:	27551
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja313j.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	628.7 KB 
ID:	27552

  8. #128
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    hello, may i have a prescreen?
    old shots that i never went back and tried to fix

    are both of them still soft?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	blxc.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	611.4 KB 
ID:	27551
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja313j.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	628.7 KB 
ID:	27552
    Yes, both a bit soft, and light/contrast a bit harsh.

  9. #129
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes, both a bit soft, and light/contrast a bit harsh.
    how about now, are they still soft, and i think that the cathay may be lacking contrast now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	blxc.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	579.5 KB 
ID:	27558
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja313j.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	604.2 KB 
ID:	27559

  10. #130
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    how about now, are they still soft, and i think that the cathay may be lacking contrast now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	blxc.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	579.5 KB 
ID:	27558
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja313j.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	604.2 KB 
ID:	27559
    I see contrast and softness still being an issue for both. Combination of terminal glass + heat haze not really helping, and not really fixable with more editing.

  11. #131
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I see contrast and softness still being an issue for both. Combination of terminal glass + heat haze not really helping, and not really fixable with more editing.
    I see, Ill keep them for the personal collection. Thanks.

  12. #132
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7506785

    Hello, does this need some CW rotation, if not, is it worth an appeal?

  13. #133
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7506785

    Hello, does this need some CW rotation, if not, is it worth an appeal?
    Yes it does. Look at the horizon.

  14. #134
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916kix2.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	707.5 KB 
ID:	27660
    hows the horizon now?
    thanks

    too soft/lacking contrast?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916ceb.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	931.6 KB 
ID:	27661

    please disregard the attached thumbnail, I don't know what happened.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	kixceb.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	686.3 KB 
ID:	27649  

  15. #135
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916kix2.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	707.5 KB 
ID:	27660
    hows the horizon now?
    thanks

    too soft/lacking contrast?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916ceb.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	931.6 KB 
ID:	27661
    Both would be ok for me.

  16. #136
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Hello, may I have a prescreen?
    still trying to find an acceptable photo for this 777

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpe1.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	352.5 KB 
ID:	28136 dark/contrast?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpe2.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	434.3 KB 
ID:	28137 soft/contrast?

    also which info should i have (or shouldnt have) put for this rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7533336 ?

    Thanks.

  17. #137
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, may I have a prescreen?
    still trying to find an acceptable photo for this 777
    Assuming these are from the same flight, they would be rejected for similar.

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    also which info should i have (or shouldnt have) put for this rejected one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7533336 ?
    This is a military aircraft.

  18. #138
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Assuming these are from the same flight, they would be rejected for similar.
    I see, may I just have a prescreen on #1?
    I'm planning on adding that one to the queue then, since both would be considered similar.

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    This is a military aircraft.
    Thank you.

  19. #139
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    I see, may I just have a prescreen on #1?
    I'm planning on adding that one to the queue then, since both would be considered similar.
    I see potential issues with softness & compression, but especially contrast. Just not great light I'm afraid (on the other one either).

  20. #140
    Junior Member ThatOneFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I see potential issues with softness & compression, but especially contrast. Just not great light I'm afraid (on the other one either).
    Thanks again, I’ll just save them for the personal collection.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •