Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    You can request as many times as you'd like, keeping in mind no one is under any obligation to answer. We (I) do this on our own time, and for various reasons (both intentional and unintentional) sometimes requests will go unanswered.
    I see, thank you for your time/help

    Comment


    • Hello, not a prescreen request so I don’t know if I should post here but I cannot find this rejected photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7493573

      It has only been 4 days since rejection, and I never got a email on my appeal.
      It doesn’t show in my rejected photos or my photo stats.
      Click image for larger version

Name:	1751F3BC-A1BE-40C2-8E04-2CCB47EE8CD6.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	117.9 KB
ID:	1041786
      Click image for larger version

Name:	FBA17B8B-1778-4210-8495-627B360A996B.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	145.7 KB
ID:	1041787

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
        Hello, not a prescreen request so I don’t know if I should post here but I cannot find this rejected photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7493573

        It has only been 4 days since rejection, and I never got a email on my appeal.
        It doesn’t show in my rejected photos or my photo stats.
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]27453[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]27454[/ATTACH]
        Unfortunately can't see anything at that link. Likely a system bug, so might need to upload the image again.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Unfortunately can't see anything at that link. Likely a system bug, so might need to upload the image again.
          I see, thanks, so I’m assuming that my appeal didn’t go through either?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
            I see, thanks, so I’m assuming that my appeal didn’t go through either?
            Didn't see any appeal, no. Again, likely due to system bug, otherwise there would be some evidence of it being screened.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              Didn't see any appeal, no. Again, likely due to system bug, otherwise there would be some evidence of it being screened.
              Okay, I'll resubmit thanks for the help

              Comment


              • hello, may i have a prescreen?
                old shots that i never went back and tried to fix

                are both of them still soft?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	blxc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	611.4 KB
ID:	1041876
                Click image for larger version

Name:	ja313j.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	628.7 KB
ID:	1041877

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                  hello, may i have a prescreen?
                  old shots that i never went back and tried to fix

                  are both of them still soft?
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]27551[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]27552[/ATTACH]
                  Yes, both a bit soft, and light/contrast a bit harsh.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Yes, both a bit soft, and light/contrast a bit harsh.
                    how about now, are they still soft, and i think that the cathay may be lacking contrast now?
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	blxc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	579.5 KB
ID:	1041883
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	ja313j.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	604.2 KB
ID:	1041884

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                      how about now, are they still soft, and i think that the cathay may be lacking contrast now?
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]27558[/ATTACH]
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]27559[/ATTACH]
                      I see contrast and softness still being an issue for both. Combination of terminal glass + heat haze not really helping, and not really fixable with more editing.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        I see contrast and softness still being an issue for both. Combination of terminal glass + heat haze not really helping, and not really fixable with more editing.
                        I see, Ill keep them for the personal collection. Thanks.

                        Comment


                        • JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                          Hello, does this need some CW rotation, if not, is it worth an appeal?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7506785

                            Hello, does this need some CW rotation, if not, is it worth an appeal?
                            Yes it does. Look at the horizon.

                            Comment


                            • Click image for larger version

Name:	rpc9916kix2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	707.5 KB
ID:	1041961
                              hows the horizon now?
                              thanks

                              too soft/lacking contrast?
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	rpc9916ceb.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	931.6 KB
ID:	1041962

                              please disregard the attached thumbnail, I don't know what happened.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]27660[/ATTACH]
                                hows the horizon now?
                                thanks

                                too soft/lacking contrast?
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]27661[/ATTACH]
                                Both would be ok for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X