Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 126

Thread: ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

  1. #41
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Thank you. Will try to fix as much as possible

  2. #42
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Qantas.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	593.2 KB 
ID:	26361

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	hl8325.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	878.2 KB 
ID:	26362

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja317j.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	835.9 KB 
ID:	26363

    any better? thanks.

    also would these be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916reg.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	909.9 KB 
ID:	26383

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc4107.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	831.8 KB 
ID:	26384

  3. #43
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    also dlowwa, if I have wing pictures from the same registration and almost the exact same crop (taken from the same seat on different days) but with different scenery, would one of them be rejected as similar?

  4. #44
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Qantas.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	593.2 KB 
ID:	26361

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	hl8325.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	878.2 KB 
ID:	26362

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ja317j.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	835.9 KB 
ID:	26363

    any better? thanks.

    also would these be acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9916reg.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	909.9 KB 
ID:	26383

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc4107.jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	831.8 KB 
ID:	26384
    1-2
    3. borderline overexposed
    4. borderline contrast
    5. contrast

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    also dlowwa, if I have wing pictures from the same registration and almost the exact same crop (taken from the same seat on different days) but with different scenery, would one of them be rejected as similar?
    Possibly, much more likely if the location is the same.

  5. #45
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Thank you. Location isn’t the same so I will find some editable shots from that flight.

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1-2
    Does this mean ok for you?Thanks.

  7. #47
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Does this mean ok for you?Thanks.
    Sorry, yeah, should have read '1-2 ok for me'

  8. #48
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Hello, i believe I have 2 new registrations, would they be considered "hot?" Is the quality good enough to be accepted?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	766.1 KB 
ID:	26459
    Worried about obstruction/contrast on this one

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RP-C7936.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	689.3 KB 
ID:	26460
    same worries.

    May I also get a prescreen on these? Thanks

    Worried about contrast on all of them.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RPC3227v2.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	764.3 KB 
ID:	26461

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc8765.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	649.8 KB 
ID:	26462

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rpc9928.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	628.6 KB 
ID:	26463

    Are any of them worth continuing to edit due to poor contrast

  9. #49
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, i believe I have 2 new registrations, would they be considered "hot?" Is the quality good enough to be accepted?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	766.1 KB 
ID:	26459
    Worried about obstruction/contrast on this one

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RP-C7936.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	689.3 KB 
ID:	26460
    same worries.
    No obstruction on the first, but indeed contrast is quite poor. That is the only one that might be worth working on. Second is indeed obstructed.

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    May I also get a prescreen on these? Thanks

    Are any of them worth continuing to edit due to poor contrast
    Probably not.

  10. #50
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	828.6 KB 
ID:	26472

    anywhere close to being borderline for too little contrast? Thanks.

  11. #51
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	828.6 KB 
ID:	26472

    anywhere close to being borderline for too little contrast? Thanks.
    Definitely a contrast (and probably color) rejection.

  12. #52
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    still too little contrast for that one?

    I tried re editing from the raw, is this any better/worth to continue editing:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	778.2 KB 
ID:	26473

  13. #53
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    still too little contrast for that one?

    I tried re editing from the raw, is this any better/worth to continue editing:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EY433.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	778.2 KB 
ID:	26473
    Color better, but still quite poor contrast. The aircraft is basically backlit, since the background sky/building is much brighter. Not sure if you can fix that.

  14. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Ah I see, I will keep it for my personal collection. Thanks.

  15. #55
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Hello, I do not know if i have reached my 5 limit for the 24 hours, as i am on vacation and it appears my time does not match.
    May I get these prescreened? Thanks.

    Worried about lack of contrast on all.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RPC7110.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	667.4 KB 
ID:	26509
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	645.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	26510
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1057.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	945.5 KB 
ID:	26511
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	48661.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.36 MB 
ID:	26512 Obstruction?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	744.2 KB 
ID:	26513

  16. #56
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    Hello, I do not know if i have reached my 5 limit for the 24 hours, as i am on vacation and it appears my time does not match.
    May I get these prescreened? Thanks.

    Worried about lack of contrast on all.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RPC7110.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	667.4 KB 
ID:	26509
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	645.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	26510
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1057.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	945.5 KB 
ID:	26511
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	48661.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.36 MB 
ID:	26512 Obstruction?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	744.2 KB 
ID:	26513
    Yes, all are likely dark/contrast rejections, though 2 & 5 might be fixable.

  17. #57
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    any better/ still lack of contrast?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	645.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	26531

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	910.4 KB 
ID:	26532

    also would this be too dark for night shot?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpewing2.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	418.3 KB 
ID:	26533

  18. #58
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    any better/ still lack of contrast?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	645.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.10 MB 
ID:	26531

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	910.4 KB 
ID:	26532

    also would this be too dark for night shot?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpewing2.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	418.3 KB 
ID:	26533
    First looks acceptable, second one has a contrast problem, third one looks dark and soft to me.

  19. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    80

    Default

    tried a different shot for the wingview, still dark?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpe3.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	362.8 KB 
ID:	26554

    contrast/darkness better?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	891.0 KB 
ID:	26555

  20. #60
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOneFish View Post
    tried a different shot for the wingview, still dark?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bkpe3.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	362.8 KB 
ID:	26554

    contrast/darkness better?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	52257.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	891.0 KB 
ID:	26555
    1. dark/contrast
    2. contrast/overprocessed

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •