Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ThatOneFish- Prescreening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Was I able to fix the light problem?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	b18051.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	701.8 KB
ID:	1040591
    Click image for larger version

Name:	bkpewing.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	421.1 KB
ID:	1040590

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
      Was I able to fix the light problem?
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26065[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26064[/ATTACH]
      1. exposure better, but looking again, might need a touch of CCW rotation.
      2. still likely a dark/contrast rejection.

      Comment


      • #33
        would i use one of the poles in the back to check for 1? or should i use one of the buildings next to the american?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
          would i use one of the poles in the back to check for 1? or should i use one of the buildings next to the american?
          The buildings and poles are both leaning, though usually buildings are a bit more reliable than light poles.

          Comment


          • #35
            I had to re edit china airlines because i forgot to save the psd. Did I correctly fix the horizons?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	b18051.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	650.2 KB
ID:	1040592

            I tried to fix the darkness/contrast issue on the wing view, do you think its not worth trying to continue to fix?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	bkpewing.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	489.6 KB
ID:	1040593

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
              I had to re edit china airlines because i forgot to save the psd. Did I correctly fix the horizons?
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26067[/ATTACH]

              I tried to fix the darkness/contrast issue on the wing view, do you think its not worth trying to continue to fix?
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26068[/ATTACH]
              1. ok for me
              2. very borderline contrast

              Comment


              • #37
                Hello, may i get a prescreen? Thanks.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	blxc.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	610.0 KB
ID:	1040815

                Click image for larger version

Name:	hl8325.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	917.6 KB
ID:	1040816

                Click image for larger version

Name:	ja313j.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.6 KB
ID:	1040817

                Click image for larger version

Name:	ja317j.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	835.9 KB
ID:	1040818

                Comment


                • #38
                  JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                  also, this was rejected for underexposed, do you think it’s worth an appeal? Thanks.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    There is a large section of the histogram very close to touching the left edge of the histogram, indicating that there are a lot of very dark shadows. Not quite solid blacks, but very dark. This might be the cause of the rejection, I'm not sure. But bringing the shadows up in Lightroom or another program should do the trick. Dlowwa did say that this same photo was acceptable for him, so it may be worth an appeal. I would make the small adjustment in post processing if you can.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                      Hello, may i get a prescreen? Thanks.
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26320[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26321[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26322[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26323[/ATTACH]
                      1. soft, borderline contrast
                      2. overexposed
                      3. soft
                      4. overexposed, borderline soft

                      Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7412539

                      also, this was rejected for underexposed, do you think it’s worth an appeal? Thanks.
                      Borderline. As I said, I think the issue is more with the contrast than the exposure itself, though it doesn't help that most of the aircraft is relatively dark.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Thank you. Will try to fix as much as possible

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	593.2 KB
ID:	1040854

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	hl8325.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	878.2 KB
ID:	1040855

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	ja317j.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	835.9 KB
ID:	1040856

                          any better? thanks.

                          also would these be acceptable?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	rpc9916reg.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	909.9 KB
ID:	1040874

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	rpc4107.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	831.8 KB
ID:	1040875

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            also dlowwa, if I have wing pictures from the same registration and almost the exact same crop (taken from the same seat on different days) but with different scenery, would one of them be rejected as similar?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26361[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26362[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26363[/ATTACH]

                              any better? thanks.

                              also would these be acceptable?

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26383[/ATTACH]

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26384[/ATTACH]
                              1-2
                              3. borderline overexposed
                              4. borderline contrast
                              5. contrast

                              Originally posted by ThatOneFish View Post
                              also dlowwa, if I have wing pictures from the same registration and almost the exact same crop (taken from the same seat on different days) but with different scenery, would one of them be rejected as similar?
                              Possibly, much more likely if the location is the same.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Thank you. Location isn’t the same so I will find some editable shots from that flight.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X