Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prescreening Request
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostHello
I'm relatively new here and would like some photos prescreened. All photos attached are hot.
Thank you
-Luca Flores
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22218[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22219[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22220[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22221[/ATTACH]
2. ok
3. soft/heat haze, borderline horizon (CW)
4. ok
Comment
-
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostHello
Here is another batch of prescreening requests.
Thank you
Luca Flores
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22376[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22377[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22378[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22379[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22380[/ATTACH]
2. overprocessed
3. borderline contrast
4-5 ok
Comment
-
Sorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.
Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?
Thank you
Luca Flores
Comment
-
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostSorry, dlowwa. I thought because this wasn't a prescreening request I should make another thread. Obviously that wasn't the case.
Anyway, I recently got this photo rejected for too much or too little contrast and invalid hot. I was under the impression that hot photos were changes to the aircraft not yet in a photo on the JetPhotos database, so I'm not sure why I got that reason for rejection. Also, could you specify if this was too much or too little contrast?
Thank you
Luca Flores
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7176051
Comment
-
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostQualifies for hot because the most recent photo of N68817 shows the bottom scimitars attached. Didn't have the bottom scimitars when I spotted it.
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostAlso, it was not overcast, there was a cloud. Sun was still shining unobstructed by clouds
Comment
-
If only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot. And I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
Comment
-
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostIf only permanent changes qualify, why do paint schemes? Those are temporary but qualify as hot.
Originally posted by klax_spotting View PostAnd I meant cloud in the photo, not blocking the sun. Just because there is a cloud in the sky doesn't mean it's overcast. There was no cloud between the sun and the plane, but there was a cloud in the photo
Comment
Comment