Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 107

Thread: Prescreening Request

  1. #81
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hello. Could I get these photos prescreened please?
    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9124.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	355.3 KB 
ID:	24727Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4765 copy.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	494.6 KB 
ID:	24728Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4749-2 copy.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	510.3 KB 
ID:	24729Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3806 copy.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	353.2 KB 
ID:	24730Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4600 copy.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	496.4 KB 
ID:	24731

  2. #82
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hello. Could I get these photos prescreened please?
    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9124.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	355.3 KB 
ID:	24727Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4765 copy.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	494.6 KB 
ID:	24728Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4749-2 copy.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	510.3 KB 
ID:	24729Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3806 copy.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	353.2 KB 
ID:	24730Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4600 copy.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	496.4 KB 
ID:	24731
    1. tail a bit soft
    2. obstruction
    3-4 ok
    5 borderline dark

  3. #83
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    If the obstruction you're referring to is the light pole to the immediate left, I'm not sure that's obstructing. I've provided a close up.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 9.43.53 PM.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	22.7 KB 
ID:	24739

  4. #84
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    If the obstruction you're referring to is the light pole to the immediate left, I'm not sure that's obstructing. I've provided a close up.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 9.43.53 PM.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	22.7 KB 
ID:	24739
    Ah, ok. In that case if you have a different frame might want to try that to avoid any confusion on the screener's part

  5. #85
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hello. I tried to fix KLM and added some more photos I'd like prescreened please.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3380.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	215.8 KB 
ID:	24807Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3981.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	325.2 KB 
ID:	24808Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4661 copy.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	532.2 KB 
ID:	24809Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4709 copy.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	506.9 KB 
ID:	24810Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9124-2.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	251.3 KB 
ID:	24811

  6. #86
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hate to come off as rude here but is there a reason my post has been ignored? I posted this 2 days ago, and other threads have been responded to.

  7. #87
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hate to come off as rude here but is there a reason my post has been ignored? I posted this 2 days ago, and other threads have been responded to.
    Some of us have lives and can't spend every minute volunteering our unpaid free time in the forum (or screening for that matter). If you want to start a collection or gofundme page so that our time is actually remunerated, I promise your posts will be answered within the hour, if not minutes. If not, you're just going to have to be patient.

    I see a little bit of vignetting on the second, and the horizon on the third might be a bit off, but otherwise the quality on these would be acceptable for me.

  8. #88
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Totally understand, I was just confused about why other threads have been responded to. Not trying to be rude. I appreciate the time you guys take to do this. Anyway, could I get this next batch prescreened please? 4 would be an airport overview.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3683.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	190.2 KB 
ID:	24974Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4884.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	357.5 KB 
ID:	24975Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4891.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	402.1 KB 
ID:	24976Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4913.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	337.5 KB 
ID:	24977Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4959.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	373.2 KB 
ID:	24978

  9. #89
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Totally understand, I was just confused about why other threads have been responded to. Not trying to be rude. I appreciate the time you guys take to do this. Anyway, could I get this next batch prescreened please? 4 would be an airport overview.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3683.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	190.2 KB 
ID:	24974Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4884.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	357.5 KB 
ID:	24975Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4891.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	402.1 KB 
ID:	24976Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4913.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	337.5 KB 
ID:	24977Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4959.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	373.2 KB 
ID:	24978
    Borderline to poor contrast on all of them except #2.

  10. #90
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Would you mind specifying which are poor and borderline? Thanks

  11. #91
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Would you mind specifying which are poor and borderline? Thanks
    1, 3, 4, 5

  12. #92
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Not what I meant. Out of which are lacking in contrast, which are borderline and which are poor? e.g. 1, 3 poor and 4, 5 borderline

  13. #93
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    1. borderline
    3-5 borderline/poor

  14. #94
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hello. Could I get this round of photos prescreened please?

    Thanks
    Luca Flores
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5545.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	542.5 KB 
ID:	25141Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6150-2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	343.6 KB 
ID:	25142Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0421.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	363.0 KB 
ID:	25143Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2119.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	456.3 KB 
ID:	25144Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3146-2.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	457.1 KB 
ID:	25145

  15. #95
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hello. Could I get this round of photos prescreened please?

    Thanks
    Luca Flores
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5545.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	542.5 KB 
ID:	25141Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6150-2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	343.6 KB 
ID:	25142Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0421.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	363.0 KB 
ID:	25143Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2119.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	456.3 KB 
ID:	25144Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3146-2.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	457.1 KB 
ID:	25145
    1. soft, borderline contrast
    2. contrast
    3. borderline dark
    4. borderline soft
    5. soft

  16. #96
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Thanks for your advice. I tried fixing 1, 2, and 5. Are they any better? I also added some photos I'd like prescreened please.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5545-2.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	407.7 KB 
ID:	25183Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6150.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	232.0 KB 
ID:	25184Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3146.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	318.8 KB 
ID:	25185Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2027.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	330.7 KB 
ID:	25186Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9299.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	323.3 KB 
ID:	25187

  17. #97
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Thanks for your advice. I tried fixing 1, 2, and 5. Are they any better?
    1, 2 no. 3 borderline but ok for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    I also added some photos I'd like prescreened please.
    4. ok
    5. soft

  18. #98
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hello. Could I get this next round prescreened please?

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9615.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	360.9 KB 
ID:	25221Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3603.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	463.4 KB 
ID:	25222Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2738.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	452.6 KB 
ID:	25223Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3988.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	250.4 KB 
ID:	25224Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9798.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	339.5 KB 
ID:	25225

  19. #99
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Hello.

    I recently got these two photos rejected without prescreening and was wondering if they were worth an appeal. I thought the contrast was fine but just curious for someone else's opinion.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7350843
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7350846

  20. #100
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klax_spotting View Post
    Hello.

    I recently got these two photos rejected without prescreening and was wondering if they were worth an appeal. I thought the contrast was fine but just curious for someone else's opinion.

    Thanks
    Luca Flores

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7350843
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7350846
    A bit flat I suppose. Borderline on the first, but the second would have been ok for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •