Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 168

Thread: Pre-screening please

  1. #21
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    Hi,

    #5

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Whoops, sorry.. I just wanted you to screen them for me.. Also, I have this new one is well, that I'd like you to pre-screen as well.


    Thanks,Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Amazon 767 .jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	213.9 KB 
ID:	22858

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    Whoops, sorry.. I just wanted you to screen them for me.. Also, I have this new one is well, that I'd like you to pre-screen as well.


    Thanks,Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Amazon 767 .jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	213.9 KB 
ID:	22858
    No chance due to backlight.

  4. #24
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    1. too far, soft/blurry, color
    2. too far, soft/blurry, noise, compression

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. too far, soft/blurry, color
    2. too far, soft/blurry, noise, compression
    This one has a little bit of a better looking sky than the other Amazon that I previously posted, so can you please pre-screen this one too?


    And if this one is still too backlit, do you have any suggestions for fixing it?

    Thanks,Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Amazon 767 2 (N1181A) (2).jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1.06 MB 
ID:	22931

  6. #26
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    This one has a little bit of a better looking sky than the other Amazon that I previously posted, so can you please pre-screen this one too?


    And if this one is still too backlit, do you have any suggestions for fixing it?

    Thanks,Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Amazon 767 2 (N1181A) (2).jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1.06 MB 
ID:	22931
    For multiple reasons, there is no chance this image would ever be accepted, sorry.

  7. #27
    Junior Member QuocTrungTran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    And if this one is still too backlit, do you have any suggestions for fixing it?

    Thanks,
    Backlit photos can't be fixed

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    For multiple reasons, there is no chance this image would ever be accepted, sorry.
    Sorry for posting the same plane at so many different angles, but would this have a chance at being accepted?






    Thanks,Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Amazon N1181A.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.21 MB 
ID:	22965

  9. #29
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    Sorry for posting the same plane at so many different angles, but would this have a chance at being accepted?
    None, sorry.

  10. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    None, sorry.
    How about this one? Pretty good lighting on this day, was just wondering if you think it'll make it on JP or notClick image for larger version. 

Name:	N771QS (3).jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	983.3 KB 
ID:	23014





    Thanks,

  11. #31
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    How about this one? Pretty good lighting on this day, was just wondering if you think it'll make it on JP or notClick image for larger version. 

Name:	N771QS (3).jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	983.3 KB 
ID:	23014





    Thanks,
    This would be rejected for soft/blurry and noisy.

  12. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    This would be rejected for soft/blurry and noisy.
    Just finished editing these ones as well, and I think they're pretty clear and sharp, do you think they'll make it?




    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N11184.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.73 MB 
ID:	23015

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kevin - MD-90.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	183.0 KB 
ID:	23016

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kevin - Challenger .jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	301.3 KB 
ID:	23017



    Thanks,

  13. #33
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    Just finished editing these ones as well, and I think they're pretty clear and sharp, do you think they'll make it?




    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N11184.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.73 MB 
ID:	23015

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kevin - MD-90.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	183.0 KB 
ID:	23016

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kevin - Challenger .jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	301.3 KB 
ID:	23017



    Thanks,
    No, because

    2. soft/blurry, color, overprocessed
    3. soft, noisy, too far

  14. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No, because

    2. soft/blurry, color, overprocessed
    3. soft, noisy, too far
    3 newly edited ones

    Please pre-screen these
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7672.CR2-3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	339.2 KB 
ID:	23093 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7684.CR2.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	465.8 KB 
ID:	23094 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0109.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	463.1 KB 
ID:	23096
    Thanks,

  15. #35
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    I'll ask you to read here once more. This time please be sure to read all of the points, in this case specifically #2 and #9.

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    You can choose to ignore the advice we give, but doing so makes it a waste of our time and gives us no incentive to continue to do so.

  16. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    I'll ask you to read here once more. This time please be sure to read all of the points, in this case specifically #2 and #9.

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    You can choose to ignore the advice we give, but doing so makes it a waste of our time and gives us no incentive to continue to do so.
    Oh, OK.. I'm really sorry, and I won't do that again. I also want to show my gratitude for the work that you guys do! I thank you for your time, and I had no idea that I was going against rules.



    Thanks,

  17. #37
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,399

    Default

    Not rules, just requests. But you can understand why if you request prescreening and are told your images will be rejected, yet we see those same images end up being screened anyway that this is a waste of time, no?

  18. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Not rules, just requests. But you can understand why if you request prescreening and are told your images will be rejected, yet we see those same images end up being screened anyway that this is a waste of time, no?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9046.CR2.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	408.9 KB 
ID:	23157Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9051.CR2.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	530.3 KB 
ID:	23158Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9140.CR2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	418.3 KB 
ID:	23159


    Can you screen these three please?






    Thanks,

  19. #39
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewBison View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9046.CR2.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	408.9 KB 
ID:	23157Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9051.CR2.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	530.3 KB 
ID:	23158Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9140.CR2.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	418.3 KB 
ID:	23159


    Can you screen these three please?






    Thanks,
    1, 2: too similar. Please choose the one you intend to upload
    3: soft and backlit

  20. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1, 2: too similar. Please choose the one you intend to upload
    3: soft and backlit
    I'll choose 1 over 2



    Thanks,

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •