Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast
Results 181 to 200 of 206

Thread: Riojako - Prescreening request / editing advice

  1. #181
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    would this be acceptable for a 1600px image? As far as processing, sharpness and exposure? Attachment 25618
    Sharpness ok, but obstruction on the nose wheel, and looks like some kind of filter was added to the sky.

  2. #182
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?

  3. #183
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?
    Definitely yes!

  4. #184
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    I noticed the taxi light there, but I used a gradient on the sky. It does not produce any halos but would it still be a overprocessed rejection if I applied something like that to any of my other photos?
    Gradient filters are considered manipulation/overprocessing, and will not only result in a rejection, but possibly a warning on your account as well.

  5. #185
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    I have removed all photos with gradients from the queue and I have re-edited them. Is this just too soft for a 1600px image?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alaska 1600.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	750.0 KB 
ID:	25644

  6. #186
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Beijing, China / College Station, TX, USA
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    I have removed all photos with gradients from the queue and I have re-edited them. Is this just too soft for a 1600px image?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alaska 1600.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	750.0 KB 
ID:	25644
    Sharpeness should be ok.

  7. #187
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Is the centering acceptable here? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4527.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	713.3 KB 
ID:	25746

  8. #188
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Is the centering acceptable here? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4527.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	713.3 KB 
ID:	25746
    Looks a bit high.

  9. #189
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Dana,

    What are the minimum acceptable dimensions for a 1600px image?

  10. #190
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Dana,

    What are the minimum acceptable dimensions for a 1600px image?
    900-1200 (16:9 - 4:3)

  11. #191
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Is this photo acceptable for a night shot? Please Pre-screen it. I shot it wide open at 1.8 with a 35mm prime lens. Also, there seems to be some weird "fringing" around the nose gear for some reason. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	166847 JP.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	506.9 KB 
ID:	25933

  12. #192
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Is this photo acceptable for a night shot? Please Pre-screen it. I shot it wide open at 1.8 with a 35mm prime lens. Also, there seems to be some weird "fringing" around the nose gear for some reason. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	166847 JP.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	506.9 KB 
ID:	25933
    Image would be rejected for underexposed.

  13. #193
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Dana,

    Is Jetphotos hiring by any chance? If so I'd be interested in working for you guys.

    Please let me know.

    Benji Gordon

  14. #194
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Dana,

    Is Jetphotos hiring by any chance? If so I'd be interested in working for you guys.

    Please let me know.

    Benji Gordon
    If only we were paid

    If you meant you were interested in joining the screening team, we'll always accept any new applications, keeping in mind:

    1. we're not actively looking to add to the team at the moment
    2. new applicants should generally have at least 500 images accepted on the DB with an acceptance rate of around 80% (or better) to be considered seriously

    If you think you'd still like to apply, you can send an email to admin explaining why, with a link to your profile/stats.

  15. #195
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    I'll keep that in mind. Thank you!

  16. #196
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Anyways back to business. How's this exposure? Tried brightening it up a bit here. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	166847 JP.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	537.5 KB 
ID:	25955

  17. #197
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Anyways back to business. How's this exposure? Tried brightening it up a bit here. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	166847 JP.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	537.5 KB 
ID:	25955
    Borderline, but would be acceptable for me.

  18. #198
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    ill give it a try. Thanks for all your help.

  19. #199
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Racine, WI
    Posts
    109

    Default

    Can I get this prescreened please?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EQA JP 2.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	823.8 KB 
ID:	26086 I'm mostly worried about the distortion, color and contrast.

  20. #200
    JetPhotos.Net Crew pdeboer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    near EHAM/AMS
    Posts
    3,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by riojako View Post
    Can I get this prescreened please?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A6-EQA JP 2.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	823.8 KB 
ID:	26086 I'm mostly worried about the distortion, color and contrast.
    it will be rejected for contrast as the a/c is not well lit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •