Bonjour,
I upped F-JSWM shot and got a rejection for similar which was a screeners misperception I think: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7183481 is similar to which image?
And it said bad info. Just because someone changes the rego to this weird french ultralight airport codes. I uploaded the previous shot under F-JSWM and got it in, google still remembers. Some one changed it and now I get a rejection
Whats the policy here, Jetphotos? i have plenty of other shots of french UL with their rego F- in the database but zero with this strange code thingy...
My appeal was rejected and the reject note says „left a note“ which he did in the wrong field which does not come through in the e-mail.
So, dear Admins, could you please define a strategy whether it should be the registration F-JSWM or not, make sure others just take the rego out if it were correct and please also tell me about the comment which came not through. Thanks for adopting a clear strategy and letting me and other know.
Cheers!
I upped F-JSWM shot and got a rejection for similar which was a screeners misperception I think: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7183481 is similar to which image?
And it said bad info. Just because someone changes the rego to this weird french ultralight airport codes. I uploaded the previous shot under F-JSWM and got it in, google still remembers. Some one changed it and now I get a rejection
Whats the policy here, Jetphotos? i have plenty of other shots of french UL with their rego F- in the database but zero with this strange code thingy...
My appeal was rejected and the reject note says „left a note“ which he did in the wrong field which does not come through in the e-mail.
So, dear Admins, could you please define a strategy whether it should be the registration F-JSWM or not, make sure others just take the rego out if it were correct and please also tell me about the comment which came not through. Thanks for adopting a clear strategy and letting me and other know.
Cheers!
Comment