Originally posted by NZDN_spotting
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reuben Morison - Prescreening/editing advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View PostThe NASA 747 is about 250m behind NXJ, so not really possible.
2) by adjusting the aperture setting, you are able to control something called depth of field (DOF), which is how much of the frame is in focus. By choosing a wider aperture like you did in this shot (f/5.6), you either weren't aware that this would affect the DOF, or if you were, made the conscious decision to go for a narrower DOF. Either way, had you stopped down the aperture a lot more, say to f/11 or smaller, a lot more of the frame would have been in focus, and your composition would have worked better.
Or, in short - yes really possible.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post1) more in focus, not simply in focus
2) by adjusting the aperture setting, you are able to control something called depth of field (DOF), which is how much of the frame is in focus. By choosing a wider aperture like you did in this shot (f/5.6), you either weren't aware that this would affect the DOF, or if you were, made the conscious decision to go for a narrower DOF. Either way, had you stopped down the aperture a lot more, say to f/11 or smaller, a lot more of the frame would have been in focus, and your composition would have worked better.
Or, in short - yes really possible.
Comment
-
Just wondering, would a photo of N7766E be hot now that it's been rebuilt and looking flyable, rather than the decrepit bare airframe of the last photo linked below?
Discussing with another screener privately, he thought it probably would be hot, but wasn't sure since there's no rule on it
jetphotos.com/photo/9153317
Comment
Comment