Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 32 of 32

Thread: RobertLN - prescreening request

  1. #21
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Yesterday I got a rejection which I still dont understand. Appeal got rejected. 'Needs clockwise rotation, everything is leaning to the left'. Thoughts about this? I disagree that everything is leaning to the left. I see much worse on the DB and I know thats not a valid argument here. I still find it frustrating. No chance for a late approval? Thanks for your time
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7316363
    I will be the fourth senior screener to look at this (two original screeners, plus one who handled the appeal) and I also agree there is a slight lean to the left with the background verticals. A small amount of CW rotation should fix this.

  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Ok thanks for your time. I used the chimneys as vertical reference and using your horizon checker I can see that they are almost perfectly parallel to the yellow grid lines. The image horizon must be therefore perpendicular to them and so parallel to the real horizon. I want to know if my approach is not correct and if I am doing something systematically wrong. Thanks again, much appreciated. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-22 um 08.03.52.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	16.5 KB 
ID:	24718

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Ok thanks for your time. I used the chimneys as vertical reference and using your horizon checker I can see that they are almost perfectly parallel to the yellow grid lines. The image horizon must be therefore perpendicular to them and so parallel to the real horizon. I want to know if my approach is not correct and if I am doing something systematically wrong. Thanks again, much appreciated. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Bildschirmfoto 2019-05-22 um 08.03.52.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	16.5 KB 
ID:	24718
    Better to use the buildings themselves, but honestly, the horizon check function is not that reliable for very short vertical references like that because the way pixel extrapolation works at such a low resolution will make almost anything look straight.

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AVVB-8870-Corr.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.09 MB 
ID:	24722 I added 0.2 CW Rotation in Lightroom. Would that be okay now? Thanks

  5. #25
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D-AVVB-8870-Corr.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.09 MB 
ID:	24722 I added 0.2 CW Rotation in Lightroom. Would that be okay now? Thanks
    Levelling would be ok for me.

  6. #26
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Hey there, I took some sunrise shots, would these be considered backlit? Any other issues with the images? Thanks a lot for your time Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-D-AYAV-8887.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	25022Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-D-AVXW-8837.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.12 MB 
ID:	25023

  7. #27
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Hey there, I took some sunrise shots, would these be considered backlit? Any other issues with the images? Thanks a lot for your time Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-D-AYAV-8887.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	25022Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-D-AVXW-8837.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	1.12 MB 
ID:	25023
    Yes, those are both backlit.

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Thanks so this photo too would have zero chance of acceptance? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-AVXR-8830-Final.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	25054

  9. #29
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Thanks so this photo too would have zero chance of acceptance? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI-AVXR-8830-Final.jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	25054
    Correct.

  10. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Alright, thanks for the confirmation! I am very thankful for your advice and work in the forum.

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Hamburg, Alicante
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Hey, would this be a suitable Airport overview for the Airbus plant at Finkenwerder/Hamburg. Or are there too many airplanes? Would the quality be ok? I am just wondering. Thanks Click image for larger version. 

Name:	EDHI.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	25574

  12. #32
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Hey, would this be a suitable Airport overview for the Airbus plant at Finkenwerder/Hamburg.
    No.

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLN View Post
    Would the quality be ok? I am just wondering.
    Quality looks ok, but not really sure the composition is justified.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •