Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 123

Thread: dxtrx-Prescreening request / Editing advice

  1. #41
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Those would be acceptable for me.

  2. #42
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Those would be acceptable for me.
    Thanks for your reply. And I've re-processed some previous pictures. Please have a look at these. Thanks again!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1223.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	998.3 KB 
ID:	24659Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1434.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	971.4 KB 
ID:	24660Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1456.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	24661Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_9119.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	448.8 KB 
ID:	24662

  3. #43
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thanks for your reply. And I've re-processed some previous pictures. Please have a look at these. Thanks again!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1223.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	998.3 KB 
ID:	24659Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1434.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	971.4 KB 
ID:	24660Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_1456.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	24661Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_9119.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	448.8 KB 
ID:	24662
    Those would be acceptable for me.

  4. #44
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Hi,please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	62692299-C72D-4A35-AE90-1B30F2951273.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	749.7 KB 
ID:	24712Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87C28B7F-6704-49F2-8B99-88EE35558688.jpeg 
Views:	13 
Size:	588.2 KB 
ID:	24713Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8F1B67A8-5C63-4A54-8819-9BE0A24F6596.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	646.0 KB 
ID:	24714Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7AD80218-4891-4A63-AE42-7534C8567364.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	741.9 KB 
ID:	24715Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F42734CB-CCA3-4BB4-906C-D852A6A6BAA8.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	658.3 KB 
ID:	24716

  5. #45
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi,please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	62692299-C72D-4A35-AE90-1B30F2951273.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	749.7 KB 
ID:	24712Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87C28B7F-6704-49F2-8B99-88EE35558688.jpeg 
Views:	13 
Size:	588.2 KB 
ID:	24713Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8F1B67A8-5C63-4A54-8819-9BE0A24F6596.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	646.0 KB 
ID:	24714Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7AD80218-4891-4A63-AE42-7534C8567364.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	741.9 KB 
ID:	24715Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F42734CB-CCA3-4BB4-906C-D852A6A6BAA8.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	658.3 KB 
ID:	24716
    All of them generally speaking OK, maybe a tad low on contrast.

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    All of them generally speaking OK, maybe a tad low on contrast.
    Thank you! I just added a little more contrast and a slight addjustment in white balance. Do they look better this time?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7594_01.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	748.5 KB 
ID:	24733Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7636_01.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	590.7 KB 
ID:	24734Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7755_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	646.3 KB 
ID:	24735Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7818_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	747.1 KB 
ID:	24736Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7867_01.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	671.0 KB 
ID:	24737

  7. #47
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thank you! I just added a little more contrast and a slight addjustment in white balance. Do they look better this time?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7594_01.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	748.5 KB 
ID:	24733Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7636_01.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	590.7 KB 
ID:	24734Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7755_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	646.3 KB 
ID:	24735Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7818_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	747.1 KB 
ID:	24736Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7867_01.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	671.0 KB 
ID:	24737
    Bit of glare on the first, and you will need to remove the dust spots, but other than that, they should be ok.

  8. #48
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Bit of glare on the first, and you will need to remove the dust spots, but other than that, they should be ok.
    OK,so maybe this version with lower exposure is better?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	15F910FF-B655-4349-B16D-3B802531BCF3.jpeg 
Views:	14 
Size:	742.9 KB 
ID:	24743

  9. #49
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    OK,so maybe this version with lower exposure is better?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	15F910FF-B655-4349-B16D-3B802531BCF3.jpeg 
Views:	14 
Size:	742.9 KB 
ID:	24743
    Would be ok for me, but I know other screeners aren't too fond of glare that is too strong.

  10. #50
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Would be ok for me, but I know other screeners aren't too fond of glare that is too strong.
    Thanks for your kind advice and I will keep it in mind. Can I take it that you mean the white line at the middle of the aircraft by “glare”?In that way,maybe a photo without that kind of white line can have a little more possibility of acceptance?

  11. #51
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thanks for your kind advice and I will keep it in mind. Can I take it that you mean the white line at the middle of the aircraft by “glare”?In that way,maybe a photo without that kind of white line can have a little more possibility of acceptance?
    Yes, that is what I was trying to say.

  12. #52
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes, that is what I was trying to say.
    OK, I will pay attention to that. And prescreen these five please. Are their exposure apporpriate? Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7194.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	603.0 KB 
ID:	24833Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7232_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	606.9 KB 
ID:	24834Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7282.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	624.5 KB 
ID:	24835Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7326.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	660.9 KB 
ID:	24836Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7437.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	690.5 KB 
ID:	24837

  13. #53
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    OK, I will pay attention to that. And prescreen these five please. Are their exposure apporpriate? Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7194.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	603.0 KB 
ID:	24833Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7232_01.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	606.9 KB 
ID:	24834Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7282.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	624.5 KB 
ID:	24835Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7326.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	660.9 KB 
ID:	24836Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7437.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	690.5 KB 
ID:	24837
    Should be ok.

  14. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Should be ok.
    Thanks a lot!

  15. #55
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Hi. Please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	62EE2472-2ECA-477C-9930-C0ABDB5E9872.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	571.5 KB 
ID:	24915Click image for larger version. 

Name:	465CF89B-CC5A-4A0E-9B65-63463F159BDD.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	574.2 KB 
ID:	24916Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2F01782A-2241-4E95-9D82-B45A0D031899.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	678.7 KB 
ID:	24917Click image for larger version. 

Name:	17F98321-2DE6-4A25-BFA5-6F17AC498DED.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	488.2 KB 
ID:	24918Click image for larger version. 

Name:	42353F8B-3B89-4E35-91B3-6B2C818492A6.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	623.4 KB 
ID:	24919

  16. #56
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. Please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	62EE2472-2ECA-477C-9930-C0ABDB5E9872.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	571.5 KB 
ID:	24915Click image for larger version. 

Name:	465CF89B-CC5A-4A0E-9B65-63463F159BDD.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	574.2 KB 
ID:	24916Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2F01782A-2241-4E95-9D82-B45A0D031899.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	678.7 KB 
ID:	24917Click image for larger version. 

Name:	17F98321-2DE6-4A25-BFA5-6F17AC498DED.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	488.2 KB 
ID:	24918Click image for larger version. 

Name:	42353F8B-3B89-4E35-91B3-6B2C818492A6.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	623.4 KB 
ID:	24919
    Other than dust spots, quality looks ok.

  17. #57
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Other than dust spots, quality looks ok.
    Thank you.I will deal with them when uploading. And how about these five?Please give some comments.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	896A792A-727A-43A8-814A-649E7DB998A0.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	548.2 KB 
ID:	24964Click image for larger version. 

Name:	13ADA134-A74A-45E4-BC05-AEDA822CEF36.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	593.6 KB 
ID:	24965Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4A38342C-4DA3-429B-9A5D-56EA8F1345A9.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	525.4 KB 
ID:	24966Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2E705763-0C4C-4356-93AD-314D562DE2F7.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	535.8 KB 
ID:	24967Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E69F5F56-0665-44CD-A07A-A9DDAA96870A.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	539.4 KB 
ID:	24968

  18. #58
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thank you.I will deal with them when uploading. And how about these five?Please give some comments.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	896A792A-727A-43A8-814A-649E7DB998A0.jpeg 
Views:	12 
Size:	548.2 KB 
ID:	24964Click image for larger version. 

Name:	13ADA134-A74A-45E4-BC05-AEDA822CEF36.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	593.6 KB 
ID:	24965Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4A38342C-4DA3-429B-9A5D-56EA8F1345A9.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	525.4 KB 
ID:	24966Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2E705763-0C4C-4356-93AD-314D562DE2F7.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	535.8 KB 
ID:	24967Click image for larger version. 

Name:	E69F5F56-0665-44CD-A07A-A9DDAA96870A.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	539.4 KB 
ID:	24968
    Don't see any major issues with quality.

  19. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Here are five new images. Are they all acceptable?Much appreciate.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BBBD6228-79B1-45B8-A696-BAD0D0F1B720.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	470.0 KB 
ID:	25056Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F9DF0022-1486-4B27-8E10-DE5AC4D8D28F.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	601.1 KB 
ID:	25057Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D4469403-0EA3-43BA-B6C5-FB1D7F547E73.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	569.2 KB 
ID:	25058Click image for larger version. 

Name:	740CD431-AE0B-4D93-AB91-B4DC9D3CDB04.jpeg 
Views:	8 
Size:	580.7 KB 
ID:	25059Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6B088E8B-F8B4-4B46-A7BE-261D5AFA9151.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	878.6 KB 
ID:	25060

  20. #60
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Here are five new images. Are they all acceptable?Much appreciate.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BBBD6228-79B1-45B8-A696-BAD0D0F1B720.jpeg 
Views:	10 
Size:	470.0 KB 
ID:	25056Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F9DF0022-1486-4B27-8E10-DE5AC4D8D28F.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	601.1 KB 
ID:	25057Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D4469403-0EA3-43BA-B6C5-FB1D7F547E73.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	569.2 KB 
ID:	25058Click image for larger version. 

Name:	740CD431-AE0B-4D93-AB91-B4DC9D3CDB04.jpeg 
Views:	8 
Size:	580.7 KB 
ID:	25059Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6B088E8B-F8B4-4B46-A7BE-261D5AFA9151.jpeg 
Views:	9 
Size:	878.6 KB 
ID:	25060
    Quality looks ok to me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •