Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dxtrx-Prescreening request / Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    All of them generally speaking OK, maybe a tad low on contrast.
    Thank you! I just added a little more contrast and a slight addjustment in white balance. Do they look better this time?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7594_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	748.5 KB
ID:	1035356Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7636_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	590.7 KB
ID:	1035357Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7755_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	646.3 KB
ID:	1035358Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7818_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	747.1 KB
ID:	1035359Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7867_01.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	671.0 KB
ID:	1035360

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
      Thank you! I just added a little more contrast and a slight addjustment in white balance. Do they look better this time?
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]24733[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24734[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24735[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24736[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24737[/ATTACH]
      Bit of glare on the first, and you will need to remove the dust spots, but other than that, they should be ok.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        Bit of glare on the first, and you will need to remove the dust spots, but other than that, they should be ok.
        OK,so maybe this version with lower exposure is better?Click image for larger version

Name:	15F910FF-B655-4349-B16D-3B802531BCF3.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	742.9 KB
ID:	1035366

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
          OK,so maybe this version with lower exposure is better?[ATTACH=CONFIG]24743[/ATTACH]
          Would be ok for me, but I know other screeners aren't too fond of glare that is too strong.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            Would be ok for me, but I know other screeners aren't too fond of glare that is too strong.
            Thanks for your kind advice and I will keep it in mind. Can I take it that you mean the white line at the middle of the aircraft by “glare”?In that way,maybe a photo without that kind of white line can have a little more possibility of acceptance?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
              Thanks for your kind advice and I will keep it in mind. Can I take it that you mean the white line at the middle of the aircraft by “glare”?In that way,maybe a photo without that kind of white line can have a little more possibility of acceptance?
              Yes, that is what I was trying to say.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Yes, that is what I was trying to say.
                OK, I will pay attention to that. And prescreen these five please. Are their exposure apporpriate? Thanks.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7194.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	603.0 KB
ID:	1035440Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7232_01.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	606.9 KB
ID:	1035441Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7282.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	624.5 KB
ID:	1035442Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7326.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	660.9 KB
ID:	1035443Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7437.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	690.5 KB
ID:	1035444

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
                  OK, I will pay attention to that. And prescreen these five please. Are their exposure apporpriate? Thanks.
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]24833[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24834[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24835[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24836[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24837[/ATTACH]
                  Should be ok.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Should be ok.
                    Thanks a lot!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Hi. Please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	62EE2472-2ECA-477C-9930-C0ABDB5E9872.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	571.5 KB
ID:	1035497Click image for larger version

Name:	465CF89B-CC5A-4A0E-9B65-63463F159BDD.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	574.2 KB
ID:	1035498Click image for larger version

Name:	2F01782A-2241-4E95-9D82-B45A0D031899.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	678.7 KB
ID:	1035499Click image for larger version

Name:	17F98321-2DE6-4A25-BFA5-6F17AC498DED.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	488.2 KB
ID:	1035500Click image for larger version

Name:	42353F8B-3B89-4E35-91B3-6B2C818492A6.jpeg
Views:	2
Size:	623.4 KB
ID:	1035501

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
                        Hi. Please prescreen these five photos. Thanks.
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]24915[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24916[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24917[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24918[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24919[/ATTACH]
                        Other than dust spots, quality looks ok.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          Other than dust spots, quality looks ok.
                          Thank you.I will deal with them when uploading. And how about these five?Please give some comments.
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	896A792A-727A-43A8-814A-649E7DB998A0.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	548.2 KB
ID:	1035540Click image for larger version

Name:	13ADA134-A74A-45E4-BC05-AEDA822CEF36.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	593.6 KB
ID:	1035541Click image for larger version

Name:	4A38342C-4DA3-429B-9A5D-56EA8F1345A9.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	525.4 KB
ID:	1035542Click image for larger version

Name:	2E705763-0C4C-4356-93AD-314D562DE2F7.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	535.8 KB
ID:	1035543Click image for larger version

Name:	E69F5F56-0665-44CD-A07A-A9DDAA96870A.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	539.4 KB
ID:	1035544

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
                            Thank you.I will deal with them when uploading. And how about these five?Please give some comments.
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24964[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24965[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24966[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24967[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24968[/ATTACH]
                            Don't see any major issues with quality.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Here are five new images. Are they all acceptable?Much appreciate.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	BBBD6228-79B1-45B8-A696-BAD0D0F1B720.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	470.0 KB
ID:	1039711Click image for larger version

Name:	F9DF0022-1486-4B27-8E10-DE5AC4D8D28F.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	601.1 KB
ID:	1039712Click image for larger version

Name:	D4469403-0EA3-43BA-B6C5-FB1D7F547E73.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	569.2 KB
ID:	1039713Click image for larger version

Name:	740CD431-AE0B-4D93-AB91-B4DC9D3CDB04.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	580.7 KB
ID:	1039714Click image for larger version

Name:	6B088E8B-F8B4-4B46-A7BE-261D5AFA9151.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	878.6 KB
ID:	1039715

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
                                Here are five new images. Are they all acceptable?Much appreciate.
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]25056[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25057[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25058[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25059[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25060[/ATTACH]
                                Quality looks ok to me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X