Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 123

Thread: dxtrx-Prescreening request / Editing advice

  1. #81
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. May I ask for a pre-screening for this one please? Thanks!
    Attachment 25403
    Borderline overexposed/overprocessed.

  2. #82
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Borderline overexposed/overprocessed.
    How about it now? I lowered the exposure and the contrast, also a slight change on whitebalance.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_9722a.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	498.8 KB 
ID:	25413

  3. #83
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    And this one please. I found it's very easy to get overexposed on China Eastern's white body.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4013.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	488.2 KB 
ID:	25414

  4. #84
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    And this one please. I found it's very easy to get overexposed on China Eastern's white body.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4013.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	488.2 KB 
ID:	25414
    Looks acceptable to me.

  5. #85
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Looks acceptable to me.
    Thanks!And the above one also acceptable?

  6. #86
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Beijing, China / College Station, TX, USA
    Posts
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thanks!And the above one also acceptable?
    B-5689 should be okay.

  7. #87
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cyx323 View Post
    B-5689 should be okay.
    Thanks a lot!

  8. #88
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Hi. Would you please prescreen these three photos? Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_3740.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	389.4 KB 
ID:	25458Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4119.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	366.9 KB 
ID:	25459Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4176.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	385.3 KB 
ID:	25460

  9. #89
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. Would you please prescreen these three photos? Thanks.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_3740.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	389.4 KB 
ID:	25458Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4119.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	366.9 KB 
ID:	25459Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4176.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	385.3 KB 
ID:	25460
    Quality would be acceptable for me.

  10. #90
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    I lowered the exposure and the sharpness of these three in order to avoid becoming oversharpened or overexposured, but maybe a little soft or dark? Please give some advices. Many thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A426805F-229F-4FB2-987A-DAD7E99CA103.jpeg 
Views:	15 
Size:	412.5 KB 
ID:	25515Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A9A14F56-2054-4D6C-AF49-217325C5BED3.jpeg 
Views:	13 
Size:	392.3 KB 
ID:	25516Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1EC4B745-B62D-4638-ACB1-EA7F38EECEEB.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	401.0 KB 
ID:	25517

  11. #91
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    I lowered the exposure and the sharpness of these three in order to avoid becoming oversharpened or overexposured, but maybe a little soft or dark? Please give some advices. Many thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A426805F-229F-4FB2-987A-DAD7E99CA103.jpeg 
Views:	15 
Size:	412.5 KB 
ID:	25515Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A9A14F56-2054-4D6C-AF49-217325C5BED3.jpeg 
Views:	13 
Size:	392.3 KB 
ID:	25516Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1EC4B745-B62D-4638-ACB1-EA7F38EECEEB.jpeg 
Views:	11 
Size:	401.0 KB 
ID:	25517
    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.

  12. #92
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    First one is a bit soft, other two should be ok.
    And how about it this time, or it's still borderline soft?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4354_01.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	451.5 KB 
ID:	25521

  13. #93
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    And how about it this time, or it's still borderline soft?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4354_01.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	451.5 KB 
ID:	25521
    Probably acceptable, though a little on the oversharpened side now for me.

  14. #94
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Probably acceptable, though a little on the oversharpened side now for me.
    Actually I can hardly tell the difference between those two...I just simply adjusted the "Sharpness" from 10 to 30 But I will try my best to practise on that.
    Many thanks for your patience and kind advices.
    So this one may be better?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4354.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	431.2 KB 
ID:	25538

  15. #95
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Actually I can hardly tell the difference between those two...I just simply adjusted the "Sharpness" from 10 to 30 But I will try my best to practise on that.
    Many thanks for your patience and kind advices.
    So this one may be better?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4354.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	431.2 KB 
ID:	25538
    Would be acceptable for me.

  16. #96
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Hi. Please prescreen these three photos (especially for their sharpness and exposure). Thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4063.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.5 KB 
ID:	25567Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4233.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.9 KB 
ID:	25568Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4292.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.7 KB 
ID:	25569

  17. #97
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. Please prescreen these three photos (especially for their sharpness and exposure). Thanks!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4063.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.5 KB 
ID:	25567Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4233.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.9 KB 
ID:	25568Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_4292.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	379.7 KB 
ID:	25569
    Acceptable.

  18. #98
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Thanks for the feeback. And how about this slot? I'm not sure about the crop of No.3. Will it be rejected for "low in frame"? Much appreciate!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5542.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	552.9 KB 
ID:	25587Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5993.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	689.7 KB 
ID:	25588Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6072.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	838.7 KB 
ID:	25589Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7684.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	509.9 KB 
ID:	25590

  19. #99
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dxtrx View Post
    Thanks for the feeback. And how about this slot? I'm not sure about the crop of No.3. Will it be rejected for "low in frame"? Much appreciate!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5542.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	552.9 KB 
ID:	25587Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5993.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	689.7 KB 
ID:	25588Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_6072.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	838.7 KB 
ID:	25589Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_7684.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	509.9 KB 
ID:	25590
    Maybe a touch low, but wouldn't be enough for a rejection from me.

  20. #100
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Tianjin
    Posts
    71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Maybe a touch low, but wouldn't be enough for a rejection from me.
    OK I see. And how about the other three?Also acceptable?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •