Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Histogram query
Collapse
X
-
I'm not a screener but I'd say two and three are your best shots at an acceptable exposure. However, it does depend on the photo. If it looks uncomfortably bright, center it on a different bulge that will allow you to reduce the exposure a bit. Seeing the actual photos would also help a judgement in the future.
-
Originally posted by fablee View PostDo any of the histograms below show sufficient overexposure to warrant rejection? Thank you very much.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]24852[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]24853[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]24854[/ATTACH]
H12 H2 H8
Comment
-
Originally posted by fablee View PostDo any of the histograms below show sufficient overexposure to warrant rejection?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael Rodeback View PostThe one on the far right and the one in the middle look the best. I don't notice anything really contributing to an overexposure rejection in the histogram though.
Originally posted by LX-A343 View PostJust to make it clear: we do screen photos, not histograms. The histogram is only used for a further check. The histogram alone may show clipped highlights or shadows, yet the photo looks OK, or vice versa.
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostNone of those show anything that would immediately make me think there might be an issue with overexposure, but as Geri said, images are screened, not histograms, so without seeing the image in question, there is not much point in speculating.Last edited by dlowwa; 2019-05-26, 23:02.
Comment
Comment