Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 165

Thread: Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

  1. #121
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    How is it now ?
    Attachment 26557
    What do you mean by color problem ? the last time color was for the color profile but i'm sure here that i'm in the good profile.
    Profile is correct, but there is a slight yellow cast. Borderline as before.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    May i have some feedback on these two also please.
    Attachment 26558
    Attachment 26559
    Both soft/blurry, especially the second.

  2. #122
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Profile is correct, but there is a slight yellow cast. Borderline as before.
    I tried to fix the problem, is it better ? If not how can i fix it ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1185.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	462.8 KB 
ID:	26589

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both soft/blurry, especially the second.
    How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0261.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	461.9 KB 
ID:	26590
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0415.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	497.5 KB 
ID:	26591

  3. #123
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I tried to fix the problem, is it better ? If not how can i fix it ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1185.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	462.8 KB 
ID:	26589
    Still borderline. There is not much more to be done with editing. Won't comment on this one again.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0261.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	461.9 KB 
ID:	26590
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0415.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	497.5 KB 
ID:	26591
    Blurry/oversharpened.

  4. #124
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still borderline. There is not much more to be done with editing. Won't comment on this one again.
    I would like to know if i ajusted the good setting or not ?

    Unfortunaly i can't do something better for the sharpening of the last two.

    May i have a pre-screing for these two ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1461.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	898.8 KB 
ID:	26597
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8911.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	488.0 KB 
ID:	26598
    i'm not sure about the sharpening.
    For the alpha jet i didn't know what to put for the information. ( the registration and the operator because i didn't see the Patrouille de France in the DB.)

  5. #125
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    May i have a pre-screing for these two ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1461.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	898.8 KB 
ID:	26597
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8911.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	488.0 KB 
ID:	26598
    i'm not sure about the sharpening.
    First one is fine; second one has multiple other issues besides sharpening.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    For the alpha jet i didn't know what to put for the information. ( the registration and the operator because i didn't see the Patrouille de France in the DB.)
    https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/E68

  6. #126
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    First one is fine; second one has multiple other issues besides sharpening.
    Thank you for your help.

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Thank you i looked it as F-TEMO that's why.

    I have here few requests.
    First one is a pre-screening of these three please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	495.3 KB 
ID:	26626
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2528.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	483.0 KB 
ID:	26627
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2191.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	559.8 KB 
ID:	26628
    I'm not sure for the sharpening of the three, but they are maybe suffering from other issue.

    Second question is for the last two pictures.
    What should i put for the registration ? and also for the airport as they have not be taken on an airport ? The nearest airport is LFRG. i saw some photos on the DB are showing other location.

    Last question is not really important, why i saw 10 daily slots for uploading but i can't only upload 5 photos ?

  7. #127
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I have here few requests.
    First one is a pre-screening of these three please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	495.3 KB 
ID:	26626
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2528.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	483.0 KB 
ID:	26627
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2191.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	559.8 KB 
ID:	26628
    I'm not sure for the sharpening of the three, but they are maybe suffering from other issue.
    1. vignetting
    2. contrast, dirty
    3. contrast/backlit

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Second question is for the last two pictures.
    What should i put for the registration ? and also for the airport as they have not be taken on an airport ? The nearest airport is LFRG. i saw some photos on the DB are showing other location.
    Neither has a chance of being accepted, but if you have better quality ones, use the info for the lead aircraft.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Last question is not really important, why i saw 10 daily slots for uploading but i can't only upload 5 photos ?
    Either your slots are blocked by rejections, or you are still on your starter queue (five slots until you have 10 images accepted).

  8. #128
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. vignetting
    2. contrast, dirty
    3. contrast/backlit
    Is this better ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	520.2 KB 
ID:	26640
    Do you check the vignetting with the dust tool ?

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Neither has a chance of being accepted, but if you have better quality ones, use the info for the lead aircraft.
    Thank you for the information.

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Either your slots are blocked by rejections, or you are still on your starter queue (five slots until you have 10 images accepted).
    So it's because i'm still in the starter queue. 2 more to go !

  9. #129
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Is this better ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	520.2 KB 
ID:	26640
    No, vignetting still visible, and also soft now.

  10. #130
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No, vignetting still visible, and also soft now.
    Let's try a last time. How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	531.7 KB 
ID:	26664

  11. #131
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Let's try a last time. How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0377.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	531.7 KB 
ID:	26664
    Borderline for vignetting and color, as the sharpening you have added has made the chromatic aberration that was present before even more obvious.

  12. #132
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Borderline for vignetting and color, as the sharpening you have added has made the chromatic aberration that was present before even more obvious.
    Thank you for your help !

  13. #133
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Hello, may i have a pre-screening for these four photos, please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1171.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	407.3 KB 
ID:	26669
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1297.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	411.8 KB 
ID:	26670
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1344.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	440.7 KB 
ID:	26671
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1309.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	476.0 KB 
ID:	26672

    I'm really not sure about the contrast.

  14. #134
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Hello, may i have a pre-screening for these four photos, please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1171.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	407.3 KB 
ID:	26669
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1297.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	411.8 KB 
ID:	26670
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1344.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	440.7 KB 
ID:	26671
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1309.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	476.0 KB 
ID:	26672

    I'm really not sure about the contrast.
    All would be rejected for contrast, among other issues. This is not fixable.

  15. #135
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Hello, may i have a pre-screening of these five photos please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0367.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	474.4 KB 
ID:	26707
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0402.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	453.6 KB 
ID:	26708
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0778.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	406.5 KB 
ID:	26709
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1332.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	433.5 KB 
ID:	26710
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1462.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	908.9 KB 
ID:	26711
    The last one would be rejected for cut-off or not ?

  16. #136
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Hello, may i have a pre-screening of these five photos please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0367.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	474.4 KB 
ID:	26707
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0402.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	453.6 KB 
ID:	26708
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0778.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	406.5 KB 
ID:	26709
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1332.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	433.5 KB 
ID:	26710
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1462.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	908.9 KB 
ID:	26711
    The last one would be rejected for cut-off or not ?
    1. soft/blurry, overexposed
    2. soft/blurry
    3. contrast
    4. blurry, borderline oversharpened
    5. cut off/motive (poor crop)

  17. #137
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    How are them now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0367.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	451.5 KB 
ID:	26746
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0402.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	433.3 KB 
ID:	26747
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1332.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	461.3 KB 
ID:	26748
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0778.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	429.7 KB 
ID:	26749
    Thank you.

  18. #138
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    How are them now?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0367.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	451.5 KB 
ID:	26746
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0402.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	433.3 KB 
ID:	26747
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1332.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	461.3 KB 
ID:	26748
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0778.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	429.7 KB 
ID:	26749
    Thank you.
    Same issues as before, though some now approaching oversharpened. You can't fix blurry by adding more sharpening, so these are probably mostly not fixable.

  19. #139
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Same issues as before, though some now approaching oversharpened. You can't fix blurry by adding more sharpening, so these are probably mostly not fixable.
    And do you think that the contrast on the Air France would be fixable ?

  20. #140
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,194

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    And do you think that the contrast on the Air France would be fixable ?
    No.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •