Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 101 to 119 of 119

Thread: Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

  1. #101
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8180.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	26369
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8682.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	441.1 KB 
ID:	26370

  2. #102
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8180.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	26369
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8682.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	441.1 KB 
ID:	26370
    1. ok
    2. contrast, soft. not fixable.

  3. #103
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. ok
    2. contrast, soft. not fixable.
    The light was not very good this day so a lot of shots are suffering of contrast problem.

    May i have your advice on these three ?

    I tried some angles i saw on JP.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4315.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	792.7 KB 
ID:	26401
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4328.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	766.6 KB 
ID:	26402
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4330.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	796.9 KB 
ID:	26403

    Are these three considered like cut-off ? or is it ok ?

    And may i have a pre-screening for this one please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4648.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	766.0 KB 
ID:	26404

  4. #104
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    The light was not very good this day so a lot of shots are suffering of contrast problem.

    May i have your advice on these three ?

    I tried some angles i saw on JP.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4315.JPG 
Views:	10 
Size:	792.7 KB 
ID:	26401
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4328.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	766.6 KB 
ID:	26402
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4330.JPG 
Views:	9 
Size:	796.9 KB 
ID:	26403

    Are these three considered like cut-off ? or is it ok ?
    2 & 3 would be ok for frame, but have other issues.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    And may i have a pre-screening for this one please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4648.JPG 
Views:	13 
Size:	766.0 KB 
ID:	26404
    Very soft, and horizon is off.

  5. #105
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Very soft, and horizon is off.
    I can't do anything better for the horizon on this one, if i would like to have any cut-off problems.

    May i have a pre-screning for these ones ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9242.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	781.2 KB 
ID:	26421
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8911.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	527.8 KB 
ID:	26422

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0415.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	538.2 KB 
ID:	26423
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0261.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	481.1 KB 
ID:	26424
    The last two are maybe soft ?
    It's still difficult for me to see if a photo is too soft or oversharpened.

  6. #106
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I can't do anything better for the horizon on this one, if i would like to have any cut-off problems.

    May i have a pre-screning for these ones ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_9242.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	781.2 KB 
ID:	26421
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8911.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	527.8 KB 
ID:	26422

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0415.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	538.2 KB 
ID:	26423
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0261.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	481.1 KB 
ID:	26424
    The last two are maybe soft ?
    It's still difficult for me to see if a photo is too soft or oversharpened.
    May i have a pre-screening for this one too please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	338.5 KB 
ID:	26458

  7. #107
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    May i have a pre-screening for this one too please.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	338.5 KB 
ID:	26458
    Would be rejected for soft & contrast.

  8. #108
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Would be rejected for soft & contrast.
    Is it for all the photos ?

    I reworked the 350, i added contrast and sharpened it a little bit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	336.8 KB 
ID:	26466

    But i'm still not sure if i sharpened it enough.

    When do you consider it too soft or oversharpened ?

  9. #109
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Is it for all the photos ?
    No, just the last one. As mentioned here: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    I tend to skip any requests that are made less than 24 hours after the previous.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I reworked the 350, i added contrast and sharpened it a little bit.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	336.8 KB 
ID:	26466

    But i'm still not sure if i sharpened it enough.

    When do you consider it too soft or oversharpened ?
    Still quite soft. Is the original that soft as well? It looks like it might even be blurry.

  10. #110
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    No, just the last one. As mentioned here: https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    I tend to skip any requests that are made less than 24 hours after the previous.
    I'm sorry i didn't look at my previous post before this one.
    May i reupload them for a pre-screnning ?


    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still quite soft. Is the original that soft as well? It looks like it might even be blurry.
    This is the reworked one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	366.7 KB 
ID:	26491
    And this is the original, i just resized it and cropped. it's really blurry for me, but i'm trying to see what can i do with a good editing. ( and also cause i'm in love with the A350 )
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_09284.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	470.4 KB 
ID:	26492

  11. #111
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I'm sorry i didn't look at my previous post before this one.
    May i reupload them for a pre-screnning ?



    This is the reworked one.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	366.7 KB 
ID:	26491
    And this is the original, i just resized it and cropped. it's really blurry for me, but i'm trying to see what can i do with a good editing. ( and also cause i'm in love with the A350 )
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_09284.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	470.4 KB 
ID:	26492
    If it's been cropped and re-sized, then it's not the original.

  12. #112
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    If it's been cropped and re-sized, then it's not the original.
    Yes, you're right.

    So this is the reworked one. Is it ok for the sharpening now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0928.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	366.7 KB 
ID:	26493
    and here the original.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_09278.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	670.6 KB 
ID:	26494

  13. #113
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    So this is the reworked one. Is it ok for the sharpening now ?
    Somewhat oversharpened/compressed now.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    and here the original.
    That is extremely soft, looks like it's not even in focus. If it had been mine, I would have deleted it before I even got home

  14. #114
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Somewhat oversharpened/compressed now.
    How can i fix a compression problem ?

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    That is extremely soft, looks like it's not even in focus. If it had been mine, I would have deleted it before I even got home
    Yes i agree with you . Normaly i delete every blurry photo, but i was trying to see what i can do with an editing. I think this one is too blurry to do something good.

    May i try with an other one ?
    how is this one ? I did nothing for the moment for the sharpening.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1324.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	432.5 KB 
ID:	26504
    You can ask me if you would like the original for this one too.

  15. #115
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    How can i fix a compression problem ?
    Save at higher quality jpeg sessions.

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    how is this one ? I did nothing for the moment for the sharpening.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1324.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	432.5 KB 
ID:	26504
    Would be rejected for soft and contrast.

  16. #116
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Would be rejected for soft and contrast.
    I reworked it, added contrast and sharpened it. How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1324.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	398.7 KB 
ID:	26523
    Maybe still soft ?

  17. #117
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    I reworked it, added contrast and sharpened it. How is it now ?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1324.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	398.7 KB 
ID:	26523
    Maybe still soft ?
    Sharpness ok, but still a contrast rejection. This is probably not fixable.

  18. #118
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    LFPO
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Sharpness ok, but still a contrast rejection. This is probably not fixable.
    Unfortunaly the constrast is not fixable on this one.
    I would like to try an other one from this spot in the same day.
    But i think it going to have a contrast problem too due to the grey sky in the back ground.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1185.jpg 
Views:	4 
Size:	427.5 KB 
ID:	26542
    How is this one ?

  19. #119
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bapt0708 View Post
    Unfortunaly the constrast is not fixable on this one.
    I would like to try an other one from this spot in the same day.
    But i think it going to have a contrast problem too due to the grey sky in the back ground.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1185.jpg 
Views:	4 
Size:	427.5 KB 
ID:	26542
    How is this one ?
    Borderline contrast/color.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •