Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: Pre- and post-screening photos - fsx98

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. overprocessed, borderline overexposed
    2. soft, contrast
    3. backlit
    4. blurry
    5. blurry, heat haze
    Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will fix N587UA and VH-ZNC but leaving the rest as personal collections.

  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Here are additional five photos that I would like pre-screened:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N205CA.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	360.8 KB 
ID:	26069Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N499CA_1.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	439.1 KB 
ID:	26070Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N908SW.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	334.3 KB 
ID:	26071Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N950JT_4.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	685.8 KB 
ID:	26072Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N67052_2_1024.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	389.0 KB 
ID:	26073

    N205CA
    N499CA
    N908SW
    N950JT
    N67052

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    Here are additional five photos that I would like pre-screened:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N205CA.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	360.8 KB 
ID:	26069Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N499CA_1.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	439.1 KB 
ID:	26070Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N908SW.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	334.3 KB 
ID:	26071Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N950JT_4.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	685.8 KB 
ID:	26072Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N67052_2_1024.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	389.0 KB 
ID:	26073

    N205CA
    N499CA
    N908SW
    N950JT
    N67052
    1. overprocessed, centering
    2. borderline blurry/heat hazed
    3. contrast. not fixable.
    4. ok
    5. blurry, contrast

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. overprocessed, centering
    2. borderline blurry/heat hazed
    3. contrast. not fixable.
    4. ok
    5. blurry, contrast
    Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will give the JetBlue a go and fix N205CA; everything else are for personal collection.

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    I have another round of five photos that I would like pre-screened:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N38473.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	404.2 KB 
ID:	26119Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N8702L.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	26120Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N485WN_2.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	461.1 KB 
ID:	26121Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N905AN.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	758.9 KB 
ID:	26122Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N920WN.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	503.7 KB 
ID:	26123

    N38473
    N8702L
    N485WN
    N905AN
    N920WN

  6. #26
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    I have another round of five photos that I would like pre-screened:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N38473.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	404.2 KB 
ID:	26119Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N8702L.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	26120Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N485WN_2.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	461.1 KB 
ID:	26121Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N905AN.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	758.9 KB 
ID:	26122Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N920WN.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	503.7 KB 
ID:	26123

    N38473
    N8702L
    N485WN
    N905AN
    N920WN
    All would be rejected:

    1. contrast, blurry, compression
    2. centering, soft, overexposed
    3. dark, contrast, soft, compression/noise, overprocessed
    4. contrast, soft, blurry, compression/noise
    5. dark/contrast, soft/heat haze, noise/compression

  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    All would be rejected:

    1. contrast, blurry, compression
    2. centering, soft, overexposed
    3. dark, contrast, soft, compression/noise, overprocessed
    4. contrast, soft, blurry, compression/noise
    5. dark/contrast, soft/heat haze, noise/compression
    Thanks Dana; may fix N8720L but probably hold off N485WN for now, and the rest are for my personal collection.

  8. #28
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    I had a photo of N830AN recently rejected for dark/underexposed; I have increased the exposure a bit, but was also worried about the glare on the rear of the aircraft; is this improved photo good enough for a re-upload to the queue?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N830AN_3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	742.8 KB 
ID:	26267

  9. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    I had a photo of N830AN recently rejected for dark/underexposed; I have increased the exposure a bit, but was also worried about the glare on the rear of the aircraft; is this improved photo good enough for a re-upload to the queue?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N830AN_3.jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	742.8 KB 
ID:	26267
    Hi, I d like a link to the rejected image.

    From what I see in the posted image theres a dark feel, theres detail loss around the tower - noise reduction? The glare on the airframe is completely blown of detail. Theres evidence of noise. either way pls post the rejected image and happy to have a look as I am sure other crew/forum will. Cheers T.

  10. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 777MAN View Post
    Hi, I d like a link to the rejected image.

    From what I see in the posted image theres a dark feel, theres detail loss around the tower - noise reduction? The glare on the airframe is completely blown of detail. Theres evidence of noise. either way pls post the rejected image and happy to have a look as I am sure other crew/forum will. Cheers T.
    Here's the photo rejected:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	79722_1561946054.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	900.9 KB 
ID:	26268

  11. #31
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    Here's the photo rejected:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	79722_1561946054.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	900.9 KB 
ID:	26268
    This would also be rejected for dark.

  12. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    This would also be rejected for dark.
    Thanks Dana; was wondering which areas of the photo would be dark?

  13. #33
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    Thanks Dana; was wondering which areas of the photo would be dark?
    The whole image is underexposed.

  14. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    The whole image is underexposed.
    Thanks for the clarification, Dana; will start over and see if I could brighten up the photo further.

  15. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    I have another photo, N7869A, rejected for overprocessed/bad post-processing and too much/too little contrast; any editing advice if this photo could be improved?

    Here below is the rejected photo:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N7869A.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	718.7 KB 
ID:	26295

  16. #36
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    I have another photo, N7869A, rejected for overprocessed/bad post-processing and too much/too little contrast; any editing advice if this photo could be improved?

    Here below is the rejected photo:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N7869A.jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	718.7 KB 
ID:	26295
    Don't think this can be improved. Light is quite poor, and tail is soft/blurry.

  17. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Don't think this can be improved. Light is quite poor, and tail is soft/blurry.
    Thanks Dana; will leave this photo for personal collection for now.

  18. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Now I know this is a long-shot attempt, as I have increased contrast and downsized the photo to mask the blurriness, but is this newly-edited photo of N7869A any better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N7869A.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	547.5 KB 
ID:	26319

  19. #39
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    6,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fsx98 View Post
    Now I know this is a long-shot attempt, as I have increased contrast and downsized the photo to mask the blurriness, but is this newly-edited photo of N7869A any better?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	N7869A.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	547.5 KB 
ID:	26319
    Still likely a contrast and possibly soft/blurry rejection.

  20. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will keep this one in my personal collection.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •