Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Help with post-processing

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4

    Default Help with post-processing

    Hello everyone:

    For this rejected photo, I got the comment that it was Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and later that Editing halos were visible. I need some help on editing halos (understand where they are) to clean this up. Any help would be appreciated. It is not because of the small size that I had to compress it to post? Is it because of doing sharpening? Thanks!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7476107

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Hello everyone:

    For this rejected photo, I got the comment that it was Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and later that Editing halos were visible. I need some help on editing halos (understand where they are) to clean this up. Any help would be appreciated. It is not because of the small size that I had to compress it to post? Is it because of doing sharpening? Thanks!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7476107

    There are halos around the aircraft. Not much you can do.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Canada (ON)
    Posts
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Hello everyone:

    For this rejected photo, I got the comment that it was Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and later that Editing halos were visible. I need some help on editing halos (understand where they are) to clean this up. Any help would be appreciated. It is not because of the small size that I had to compress it to post? Is it because of doing sharpening? Thanks!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7476107
    How did you bring the contrast up? Was it with Curves or some sort of automated tool?

    Alex

  4. #4
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Hello everyone:

    For this rejected photo, I got the comment that it was Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and later that Editing halos were visible. I need some help on editing halos (understand where they are) to clean this up. Any help would be appreciated. It is not because of the small size that I had to compress it to post? Is it because of doing sharpening? Thanks!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7476107
    With halos that severe, you must really be hammering it with something. You can either reprocess from the RAW file, or start from scratch with a different file. Make sure the D-lighting is turned off in your Nikon, and don't use any tools like clarity, vibrance, de-haze, shadow/highlight, etc.. when editing, and you should be able to avoid them in the future.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Thank you everyone for your comments. I was using Darktable and used the basic group exposure and highlight reconstruction. Here's another image where I just lowered the exposure. I have D-lighting off, but shoot in raw, so it should not impact, right? Can you please let me know your thoughts?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0678.jpg 
Views:	60 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	27183

    Thanks again.

  6. #6
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Thank you everyone for your comments. I was using Darktable and used the basic group exposure and highlight reconstruction. Here's another image where I just lowered the exposure. I have D-lighting off, but shoot in raw, so it should not impact, right? Can you please let me know your thoughts?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0678.jpg 
Views:	60 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	27183

    Thanks again.
    Doesn't work for me. The photo is too dark and shows some signs of vignetting.

  7. #7
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Thank you everyone for your comments. I was using Darktable and used the basic group exposure and highlight reconstruction. Here's another image where I just lowered the exposure. I have D-lighting off, but shoot in raw, so it should not impact, right? Can you please let me know your thoughts?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0678.jpg 
Views:	60 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	27183

    Thanks again.
    As Geri said, dark and vignetting, but editing halos still visible (though not as strong as previous version), and white balance is also off.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Thank you everyone for helping me learn and understand this. Can you please review 2 additional pictures as well? One is the same as the previous one, without any changes (just cropping) and the second one is a different image. If both of these are bad, then I will need to take some classes to understand how to do this the right way. This time instead of dark table, I am using Nikon's Capture-D. I did lens correction, so vignetting should be off and left the white balance at auto.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0676_00001.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	367.6 KB 
ID:	27209
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0678_00001.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	359.6 KB 
ID:	27210

  9. #9
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arora7dm View Post
    Thank you everyone for helping me learn and understand this. Can you please review 2 additional pictures as well? One is the same as the previous one, without any changes (just cropping) and the second one is a different image. If both of these are bad, then I will need to take some classes to understand how to do this the right way. This time instead of dark table, I am using Nikon's Capture-D. I did lens correction, so vignetting should be off and left the white balance at auto.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0676_00001.jpg 
Views:	14 
Size:	367.6 KB 
ID:	27209
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	NZ6_0678_00001.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	359.6 KB 
ID:	27210
    1. dark/contrast, centering, vignetting, borderline overprocessed
    2. dark/contrast, vignetting, dirty, borderline overprocessed

    The overprocessing in this case is relatively minor for both (very light halos visible top of fusealge). The vignetting and flat light/underexposure would be the real killers if you were to submit the images.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •