Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 66

Thread: Pre-Screening Request

  1. #21
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    I've made the needed corrections (and uploaded the last one) are the images ok now? Attachment 28199Attachment 28200Attachment 28201Attachment 28202

    Edit: the attached thumbnail is unintentional and I don't know how to remove it.
    2. borderline soft/noisy
    3-4 borderline soft

  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	685.8 KB 
ID:	28282 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	573.0 KB 
ID:	28283 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (7).jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	656.2 KB 
ID:	28284 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (8).jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	523.1 KB 
ID:	28285

  3. #23
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	685.8 KB 
ID:	28282 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	573.0 KB 
ID:	28283 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (7).jpg 
Views:	19 
Size:	656.2 KB 
ID:	28284 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (8).jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	523.1 KB 
ID:	28285
    Quality looks good on those to me.

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Quality looks good on those to me.
    Does this mean that they should be OK or do they have any flaws?

  5. #25
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Does this mean that they should be OK or do they have any flaws?
    As I said, ok for me. That doesn't mean I can promise others won't find issues, but I would accept them if I were the one to screen them.

  6. #26
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Yeah I totally understand, it's the first time getting that kind of answer so I'm just double checkingi

  7. #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (9).jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	852.0 KB 
ID:	28446 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (10).jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1,012.8 KB 
ID:	28447

  8. #28
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (9).jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	852.0 KB 
ID:	28446 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (10).jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	1,012.8 KB 
ID:	28447
    Second one nearly backlit, but both would be ok for me.

  9. #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Thanks! How about these 2? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5781.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	28459Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (12).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	784.6 KB 
ID:	28460

  10. #30
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Thanks! How about these 2? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5781.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	28459Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (12).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	784.6 KB 
ID:	28460
    Second one needs a touch of CW rotation. First is not uploadable.

  11. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    ahhh ...sorry i forgot again....I sent the corrected versions if you don't mind giving them a look. Also, would the 2nd require the Crago (it serves as a cargo plane now) or small prop category? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (13).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	784.6 KB 
ID:	28463Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (11).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	562.5 KB 
ID:	28462

  12. #32
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    ahhh ...sorry i forgot again....I sent the corrected versions if you don't mind giving them a look. Also, would the 2nd require the Crago (it serves as a cargo plane now) or small prop category? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (13).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	784.6 KB 
ID:	28463Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (11).jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	562.5 KB 
ID:	28462
    First ok, second dirty & borderline overexposed. I personally don't mind the tight crops, but I know some guys who might reject for clipping the static vanes on the end of the stabilizers.

  13. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    First ok, second dirty & borderline overexposed. I personally don't mind the tight crops, but I know some guys who might reject for clipping the static vanes on the end of the stabilizers.
    OK, I'll give it an other crop! Also should I mark any Aircraft Specific categories for the first one? I think i see them in a different order, can you confirm that the blue plane is the first on the previous reply?

  14. #34
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    OK, I'll give it an other crop! Also should I mark any Aircraft Specific categories for the first one? I think i see them in a different order, can you confirm that the blue plane is the first on the previous reply?
    Yes Cargo, No Small Prop.

  15. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes Cargo, No Small Prop.
    OK, thanks a lot for your help!

  16. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners, would this picture get accepted? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (15).jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28549

  17. #37
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners, would this picture get accepted? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (15).jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28549
    Horizon might need a bit of CW rotation.

  18. #38
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Horizon might need a bit of CW rotation.
    Is it better now?(I rotated it 0.10 units,in Lightroom) Thanks Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (16).jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28560

  19. #39
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Is it better now?(I rotated it 0.10 units,in Lightroom) Thanks Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (16).jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28560
    Can't see much difference; looks like you've actually rotated it a little CCW, if anything.

  20. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    Can't see much difference; looks like you've actually rotated it a little CCW, if anything.
    I think I made some improvements,can you check it? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (17).jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28565

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •