Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Pre-Screening Request

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default Pre-Screening Request

    Hello, dear JP screeners, are these photos acceptable? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg 
Views:	71 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	27617 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	721.3 KB 
ID:	27618Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	27619Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	64 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	27620Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (4).jpg 
Views:	75 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	27621

  2. #2
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello, dear JP screeners, are these photos acceptable? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg 
Views:	71 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	27617 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	73 
Size:	721.3 KB 
ID:	27618Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	65 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	27619Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	64 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	27620Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (4).jpg 
Views:	75 
Size:	1.11 MB 
ID:	27621
    Hi,

    1. centering (too low), horizon, borderline dark
    2. overprocessed (editing halos)
    3-4 soft, centering
    5. ok

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Thanks a lot! Are the images ok now? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	27631Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	677.5 KB 
ID:	27629Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	27630Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	27627
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	1.19 MB 
ID:	27628  

  4. #4
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Thanks a lot! Are the images ok now? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	27631Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	677.5 KB 
ID:	27629Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	1.13 MB 
ID:	27630Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	1.01 MB 
ID:	27627
    1. soft, centering
    2. overprocessed
    3. soft, centering, borderline contrast
    4. centering, horizon, borderline soft

  5. #5
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Restored the post for you.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Thanks a lot!

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening (this is my firts time uploading military pics and I'm not very sure about the edit). Moreover, the picture of the Eurofighter is the first I believe with the full RAF paint (the other one is in with the brown factory scheme, reg. is ZK435 if you can check), do you think it desevres priority screening? Also is the angle of the helicopter acceptable (it's a new registration BTW). Finaly, should i create a new thread or continue posting here? Thanks in advance! Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	28015Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	489.4 KB 
ID:	28016Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (7).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.97 MB 
ID:	28017Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (8).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	28018Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (9).jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.23 MB 
ID:	28019

  8. #8
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening (this is my firts time uploading military pics and I'm not very sure about the edit). Moreover, the picture of the Eurofighter is the first I believe with the full RAF paint (the other one is in with the brown factory scheme, reg. is ZK435 if you can check), do you think it desevres priority screening? Also is the angle of the helicopter acceptable (it's a new registration BTW). Finaly, should i create a new thread or continue posting here? Thanks in advance! Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.04 MB 
ID:	28015Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	489.4 KB 
ID:	28016Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (7).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.97 MB 
ID:	28017Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (8).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	28018Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (9).jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	1.23 MB 
ID:	28019
    1. ok. yes hot if new paint.
    2. not upload size
    3. cropping/ratio, overprocessed
    4-5 borderline overexposed/contrast

    3:2 - 16:9 is the maximum allowed range for photo ratios. Images that are larger than 1920pix will not be prescreened, and even then you need to be pre-approved to upload at 1920pix, so unless you have been, better to start with image sizes you can actually submit, like 1280.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Hello and thenks for you help! I re-edited the images and made some improvements, are they ok now? Also, this is my first time uploading military, the only difference from civil aviation when uploading should be the selection of the genre box? Thanks in advance!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	574.9 KB 
ID:	28021Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	822.5 KB 
ID:	28022Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.25 MB 
ID:	28023Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.24 MB 
ID:	28024

  10. #10
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello and thenks for you help! I re-edited the images and made some improvements, are they ok now? Also, this is my first time uploading military, the only difference from civil aviation when uploading should be the selection of the genre box? Thanks in advance!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	574.9 KB 
ID:	28021Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	822.5 KB 
ID:	28022Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.25 MB 
ID:	28023Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.24 MB 
ID:	28024
    Might be a little bit clearer knowing I got 2-3 mixed up above.

    1. see here:
    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    3:2 - 16:9 is the maximum allowed range for photo ratios.
    Also still overprocessed, and not upload size. 1024 is the minimum.

    2. borderline heat haze
    3-4 better, still borderline. would be (just) ok for me.

    Military aircraft just need to have the correct genre selected.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners! I'm trying to fill up my queue, are these photos acceptable? Thanks a lot for your help!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	phcdh.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	28053 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxdvp.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	28052Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxmpk.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	855.2 KB 
ID:	28054Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dkdbw.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	973.8 KB 
ID:	28055Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fhepe.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	584.5 KB 
ID:	28056

  12. #12
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners! I'm trying to fill up my queue, are these photos acceptable? Thanks a lot for your help!
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	phcdh.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	28053 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxdvp.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	28052Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxmpk.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	855.2 KB 
ID:	28054Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dkdbw.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	973.8 KB 
ID:	28055Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fhepe.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	584.5 KB 
ID:	28056
    Hi, when you get a chance please read here, especially #3:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Will answer this time but just know for the future, too many requests in too short a time period may just be ignored.

    Quality looks ok on all, though 1 & 3 might need a touch of CW rotation, and 4 a bit better centering.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Thanks for your reply and sorry for ''spamming''. I read the link, it won't happen again! I re-edited the pics, are they fine now? Thanks again and sorry.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	phcdh.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	28064Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxmpk.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	855.1 KB 
ID:	28065Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dkdbw.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	965.7 KB 
ID:	28066

  14. #14
    JetPhotos.Net Crew LX-A343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Zurich Kloten - LSZH
    Posts
    13,560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Thanks for your reply and sorry for ''spamming''. I read the link, it won't happen again! I re-edited the pics, are they fine now? Thanks again and sorry.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	phcdh.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	1.08 MB 
ID:	28064Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sxmpk.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	855.1 KB 
ID:	28065Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dkdbw.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	965.7 KB 
ID:	28066
    As I see it, it DID happen again. You will most likely not get an answer right now.

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX-A343 View Post
    As I see it, it DID happen again. You will most likely not get an answer right now.
    I thought that the same pictures (when asking for the check of the re-edit) didn't count. Its says maximum 5 per 24 hrs (which i did not violate to beggin with) and those are the same images, just their updated version. I'm a new user and I'm not completely familiar with the forum...sorry for the misunderstanding

  16. #16
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    I thought that the same pictures (when asking for the check of the re-edit) didn't count. Its says maximum 5 per 24 hrs (which i did not violate to beggin with) and those are the same images, just their updated version. I'm a new user and I'm not completely familiar with the forum...sorry for the misunderstanding
    It's ok, you are allowed to post as many images as you would like, as often as you would like (even within the 24-hour window), but the more that you do, the less likely crew will answer. I don't mind answering corrected versions posted again within the 24 hours, as long as it's only once or twice. I personally won't answer any new images within that 24-hours, however. That doesn't mean any non-crew can't offer opinions though Sorry if that's a bit confusing.. just trying to manage our (my) workload by encouraging people to try and learn and improve on their own.

    Anyway, for your corrected versions:

    1. CW needed, not CCW.
    2. better, but only slight difference. might be enough.
    3. ok for me

  17. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dlowwa View Post
    It's ok, you are allowed to post as many images as you would like, as often as you would like (even within the 24-hour window), but the more that you do, the less likely crew will answer. I don't mind answering corrected versions posted again within the 24 hours, as long as it's only once or twice. I personally won't answer any new images within that 24-hours, however. That doesn't mean any non-crew can't offer opinions though Sorry if that's a bit confusing.. just trying to manage our (my) workload by encouraging people to try and learn and improve on their own.

    Anyway, for your corrected versions:

    1. CW needed, not CCW.
    2. better, but only slight difference. might be enough.
    3. ok for me
    Great! Thanks for the explenation!

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening on the following images. Thanks! Also should I select 'special scheme' for number 5 or not?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	947.8 KB 
ID:	28175Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	733.4 KB 
ID:	28176Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.21 MB 
ID:	28177Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28178Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	760.8 KB 
ID:	28179

  19. #19
    JetPhotos.Net Crew
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening on the following images. Thanks! Also should I select 'special scheme' for number 5 or not?Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	947.8 KB 
ID:	28175Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	733.4 KB 
ID:	28176Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.21 MB 
ID:	28177Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	1.03 MB 
ID:	28178Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	760.8 KB 
ID:	28179
    Some softness visible 1-4, but otherwise ok. Yes Special for last one.

  20. #20
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    19

    Default

    I've made the needed corrections (and uploaded the last one) are the images ok now? Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5356.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	1.95 MB 
ID:	28199Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	842.1 KB 
ID:	28200Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg 
Views:	11 
Size:	1.22 MB 
ID:	28201Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg 
Views:	7 
Size:	1.09 MB 
ID:	28202

    Edit: the attached thumbnail is unintentional and I don't know how to remove it.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC_5394.jpg 
Views:	2 
Size:	1.91 MB 
ID:	28198  

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •