Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-Screening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
    I thought that the same pictures (when asking for the check of the re-edit) didn't count. Its says maximum 5 per 24 hrs (which i did not violate to beggin with) and those are the same images, just their updated version. I'm a new user and I'm not completely familiar with the forum...sorry for the misunderstanding
    It's ok, you are allowed to post as many images as you would like, as often as you would like (even within the 24-hour window), but the more that you do, the less likely crew will answer. I don't mind answering corrected versions posted again within the 24 hours, as long as it's only once or twice. I personally won't answer any new images within that 24-hours, however. That doesn't mean any non-crew can't offer opinions though Sorry if that's a bit confusing.. just trying to manage our (my) workload by encouraging people to try and learn and improve on their own.

    Anyway, for your corrected versions:

    1. CW needed, not CCW.
    2. better, but only slight difference. might be enough.
    3. ok for me

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      It's ok, you are allowed to post as many images as you would like, as often as you would like (even within the 24-hour window), but the more that you do, the less likely crew will answer. I don't mind answering corrected versions posted again within the 24 hours, as long as it's only once or twice. I personally won't answer any new images within that 24-hours, however. That doesn't mean any non-crew can't offer opinions though Sorry if that's a bit confusing.. just trying to manage our (my) workload by encouraging people to try and learn and improve on their own.

      Anyway, for your corrected versions:

      1. CW needed, not CCW.
      2. better, but only slight difference. might be enough.
      3. ok for me
      Great! Thanks for the explenation!

      Comment


      • #18
        Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening on the following images. Thanks! Also should I select 'special scheme' for number 5 or not?Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	947.8 KB
ID:	1042386Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	733.4 KB
ID:	1042387Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1042388Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1042389Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	760.8 KB
ID:	1042390

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
          Hello dear JP screeners, I would appreciate pre-screening on the following images. Thanks! Also should I select 'special scheme' for number 5 or not?[ATTACH=CONFIG]28175[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28176[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28177[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28178[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28179[/ATTACH]
          Some softness visible 1-4, but otherwise ok. Yes Special for last one.

          Comment


          • #20
            I've made the needed corrections (and uploaded the last one) are the images ok now? Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5356.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.95 MB
ID:	1042410Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (5).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	842.1 KB
ID:	1042411Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1042412Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (3).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1042413

            Edit: the attached thumbnail is unintentional and I don't know how to remove it.
            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
              I've made the needed corrections (and uploaded the last one) are the images ok now? [ATTACH=CONFIG]28199[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28200[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28201[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28202[/ATTACH]

              Edit: the attached thumbnail is unintentional and I don't know how to remove it.
              2. borderline soft/noisy
              3-4 borderline soft

              Comment


              • #22
                Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (1).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	685.8 KB
ID:	1042470 Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (6).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	573.0 KB
ID:	1042471 Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (7).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	656.2 KB
ID:	1042472 Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (8).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	523.1 KB
ID:	1042473

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
                  Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]28282[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]28283[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]28284[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]28285[/ATTACH]
                  Quality looks good on those to me.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Quality looks good on those to me.
                    Does this mean that they should be OK or do they have any flaws?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
                      Does this mean that they should be OK or do they have any flaws?
                      As I said, ok for me. That doesn't mean I can promise others won't find issues, but I would accept them if I were the one to screen them.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Yeah I totally understand, it's the first time getting that kind of answer so I'm just double checkingi

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (9).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	852.0 KB
ID:	1042600 Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (10).jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1,012.8 KB
ID:	1042601

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
                            Hello dear JP screeners, are any of these pics acceptable?
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]28446[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]28447[/ATTACH]
                            Second one nearly backlit, but both would be ok for me.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Thanks! How about these 2? Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5781.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1042611Click image for larger version

Name:	Webp.net-resizeimage (12).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	784.6 KB
ID:	1042612

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by John Leivaditis View Post
                                Thanks! How about these 2? [ATTACH=CONFIG]28459[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]28460[/ATTACH]
                                Second one needs a touch of CW rotation. First is not uploadable.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X