Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, I've started from scratch and have attempted to avoid creating halos in the process; is this batch any better?
    No, halos are still there. You can contact me directly if you want to send me one of the RAW files to process to see if I can come up with an edit without halos.

    Comment


    • #17
      Hello! I would like to know if any of these 2 pictures would be accepted into the database, and if not, what changes should be made (if any). Thanks in advance for the help!
      Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	444.4 KB
ID:	1040933Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	438.6 KB
ID:	1040934

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
        Hello! I would like to know if any of these 2 pictures would be accepted into the database, and if not, what changes should be made (if any). Thanks in advance for the help!
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]26452[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26453[/ATTACH]
        Both images are quite soft, and the first also has vignetting and dust spots.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          Both images are quite soft, and the first also has vignetting and dust spots.
          Are these any better? For the TS one, I managed to find a small dust spot towards the top, but otherwise, I can't see any others. If there are more, where are they on the picture? Thanks again!
          Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	458.0 KB
ID:	1040935Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	467.8 KB
ID:	1040936

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
            Are these any better? For the TS one, I managed to find a small dust spot towards the top, but otherwise, I can't see any others. If there are more, where are they on the picture? Thanks again!
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]26454[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26455[/ATTACH]
            Both still quite soft (would probably also benefit from increased contrast as well). Vignetting and at least one dust spot above engine remain on TS.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              Both still quite soft (would probably also benefit from increased contrast as well). Vignetting and at least one dust spot above engine remain on TS.
              Hello again, is this version any better? For TS I think I removed the dust spot you were talking about, but am not sure as to whether or not I actually removed it, or if just staring at the picture too long tricked me into seeing things. I did use the "visualize spots" tool in Lightroom to see if I could spot it, but couldn't really see anything that didn't look like a cloud formation from the background. Also, seeing as it has been 24 hours since I first sent these pictures in (please correct me if I'm wrong), I was wondering if you could also have a look at the KLM A330 below. Thanks again for the insight and help!
              Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.5 KB
ID:	1040952Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	500.3 KB
ID:	1040953Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	533.6 KB
ID:	1040954

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
                Hello again, is this version any better? For TS I think I removed the dust spot you were talking about, but am not sure as to whether or not I actually removed it, or if just staring at the picture too long tricked me into seeing things. I did use the "visualize spots" tool in Lightroom to see if I could spot it, but couldn't really see anything that didn't look like a cloud formation from the background. Also, seeing as it has been 24 hours since I first sent these pictures in (please correct me if I'm wrong), I was wondering if you could also have a look at the KLM A330 below. Thanks again for the insight and help!
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]26474[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26475[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26476[/ATTACH]
                All images still soft, especially the first two.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  All images still soft, especially the first two.
                  Hello again, sorry for being a bit annoying with this specific batch of pictures, but are these any better regarding the softness? At this point, is it more of a blurry type of problem, or is it really just softness? Also, for the previous issues regarding TS (dust spots, vignetting), have those been fixed or are they still there? Thanks once again for your insightful comments, it's much appreciated!
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.0 KB
ID:	1040972Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	522.8 KB
ID:	1040973Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	567.9 KB
ID:	1040974

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
                    Hello again, sorry for being a bit annoying with this specific batch of pictures, but are these any better regarding the softness? At this point, is it more of a blurry type of problem, or is it really just softness? Also, for the previous issues regarding TS (dust spots, vignetting), have those been fixed or are they still there? Thanks once again for your insightful comments, it's much appreciated!
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26495[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26496[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26497[/ATTACH]
                    These are better, but would still likely be rejected for soft. Without seeing the originals, I couldn't tell you exactly what the issue was.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      These are better, but would still likely be rejected for soft. Without seeing the originals, I couldn't tell you exactly what the issue was.
                      Alright, I've attempted to fix the softness once again. Are they passable this time around, or do they still suffer from the same issue?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.8 KB
ID:	1040983Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	556.2 KB
ID:	1040984Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	599.4 KB
ID:	1040985

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
                        Alright, I've attempted to fix the softness once again. Are they passable this time around, or do they still suffer from the same issue?
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]26506[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26507[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26508[/ATTACH]
                        Yes all still soft, the first two especially.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.7 KB
ID:	1041157Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	499.3 KB
ID:	1041158Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	611.4 KB
ID:	1041159Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.7 KB
ID:	1041160Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	553.6 KB
ID:	1041161

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
                            Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]26702[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26703[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26704[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26705[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26706[/ATTACH]
                            Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                              Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.
                              Are these any better?
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.8 KB
ID:	1041167Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.2 KB
ID:	1041168Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	635.4 KB
ID:	1041169Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	739.0 KB
ID:	1041170Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	568.2 KB
ID:	1041171

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
                                Are these any better?
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]26712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26714[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26715[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26716[/ATTACH]
                                Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X