Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StefBrat - Editing and Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
    I found these, they are from 2016 and sadly not shot in RAW. Don't know if quality is good enough for an upload. If not it's also okay but don't want to block any space in the queue.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13933[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]13934[/ATTACH]
    Second is a bit soft, but quality otherwise looks fine to me.

    Comment


    • #17
      Thanks Dana. Would like to have on this one any opinion.

      My thoughts why it could be rejected: Blurry,Soft, Unleveled. Even there where maybe 0°C I can see heat haze?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6446.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.59 MB
ID:	1022568
      View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
        Thanks Dana. Would like to have on this one any opinion.

        My thoughts why it could be rejected: Blurry,Soft, Unleveled. Even there where maybe 0°C I can see heat haze?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14003[/ATTACH]
        This one looks passable to me, there is no haze on the aircraft. If you wanted to be safe, a smaller size than 1600 pix would be a good idea.

        Heat haze can occur at any temperature, as long as there is a significant difference in the temperature of the air on the ground, and higher up.

        Comment


        • #19
          Thanks always for the great help.

          I'm not sure with this one as it was a hot day in general and I'm also not sure about motive. If it's only technical problems I will try these shot again in my holiday this year

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4432.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	1022755

          or

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4433.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.65 MB
ID:	1022756

          EDIT: What about that photo of the Easyjet?
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6857.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.40 MB
ID:	1022762
          View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
            Thanks always for the great help.

            I'm not sure with this one as it was a hot day in general and I'm also not sure about motive. If it's only technical problems I will try these shot again in my holiday this year

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14214[/ATTACH]

            or

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14215[/ATTACH]
            Both oversharpened but otherwise ok as long as uploaded with correct info.

            Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
            EDIT: What about that photo of the Easyjet?
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]14221[/ATTACH]
            Should be ok.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              Both oversharpened but otherwise ok as long as uploaded with correct info.
              Is it better now? Info should be airport overview?
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4432.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.75 MB
ID:	1022773

              Below the original unedited image, maybe the JPEG is simply not good
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4432-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.47 MB
ID:	1022774
              View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                Is it better now? Info should be airport overview?
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14232[/ATTACH]
                Would be ok for me. Yes, Airport Overview.

                Comment


                • #23
                  What do you think with that picture below? Is from 2016 and not sure with sharpness/noise and if it's overall worth for uploading?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7251.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1022863
                  View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                    What do you think with that picture below? Is from 2016 and not sure with sharpness/noise and if it's overall worth for uploading?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]14354[/ATTACH]
                    Neither noise nor sharpness should be an issue.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Could you please have a look here: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6440783

                      It was two times rejected for horizon but in LR the red/white pole in the back looks good.
                      View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                        Could you please have a look here: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6440783

                        It was two times rejected for horizon but in LR the red/white pole in the back looks good.
                        In fact the red/white pole is leaning right (as are all other verticals) which indicates CCW rotation is needed.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hmm..one of the things which are taking my most time. Could you please check again, especially for horizon but if you see something else please give a shout I would like to get it accepted as I like the shot and the viewpoint

                          Thanks

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6840.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1022956
                          View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I would give it a 0.3 CCW rotation, except that it looks acceptable I think

                            cheers
                            Alex

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Could you please look on these, the aircrafts should all be new or nearly all. But of course I'd like to maintain the needed quality so please check for that Many thanks

                              My most concerns are leveling, noise, blurry or soft.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7271.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1023013

                              Looks unleveled but the black window of the house in the back seems leveled
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7283.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	999.3 KB
ID:	1023014

                              This will be Ramp shot ticked...
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7290.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1023015

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7295.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	865.4 KB
ID:	1023016

                              PS: Sorry for the questions
                              View my Spottingpictures on Jetphotos.net here

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by StefBrat View Post
                                Could you please look on these, the aircrafts should all be new or nearly all. But of course I'd like to maintain the needed quality so please check for that Many thanks

                                My most concerns are leveling, noise, blurry or soft.

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14559[/ATTACH]

                                Looks unleveled but the black window of the house in the back seems leveled
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14560[/ATTACH]

                                This will be Ramp shot ticked...
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14561[/ATTACH]

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]14562[/ATTACH]

                                PS: Sorry for the questions
                                Hey

                                1, 2 and 4 should be OK for me
                                3 is that a dust spot or a bird above the highest tree? Can´t identify it. But other than that it should be OK too.

                                Have a good start in the new week!
                                Best Regards from Germany,
                                Julian S.​

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X