2 Canons, with a various assemblage of lenses (300, 70-200, 24-105, 85) and a couple of teleconvertors thrown in.
I went with Canon after reading some of the reviews on their L lenses, which are really good. But as someone else in the thread already pointed out, the Nikon vs Canon vs (add your own here) is pointless. Most DSLRs these days are comparable. The real challenge is in the PP work done afterwards.
I went with Canon after reading some of the reviews on their L lenses, which are really good. But as someone else in the thread already pointed out, the Nikon vs Canon vs (add your own here) is pointless. Most DSLRs these days are comparable. The real challenge is in the PP work done afterwards.
Comment