When I rethink it, and I come back on topic...
270 @ 46 already is something, not less. I can say nothing about LOWS, that strip is too short for my simulator, especially if I take into account the 10 mile zone (without high buildings). Obstacles near LOWS are made of stone afaik: Gaisberg, 4225 AMSL, cp LOWS 1411 AMSL.
And the LOWS rwy 33 is not longer than the EDDL 23R . I have seen A330 who land on the EDDL 23R. But here we don't have obstacles @ 4225 AMSL in "the zone"...
My conclusion? Definitely turn a/t and a/p off. But then I'd recommend a landing with 270 @ 46 only for pilots who are born near LOWS and who are "born in a B738". There is a reason why I'll never in my life apply for a job at Austrian (OS). You should be born in the Alps if you like to fly for OS.
There was no better solution than a return to Rhein/Main? Imho that's perfectly fine. For reasons, see my signature.
270 @ 46 already is something, not less. I can say nothing about LOWS, that strip is too short for my simulator, especially if I take into account the 10 mile zone (without high buildings). Obstacles near LOWS are made of stone afaik: Gaisberg, 4225 AMSL, cp LOWS 1411 AMSL.
And the LOWS rwy 33 is not longer than the EDDL 23R . I have seen A330 who land on the EDDL 23R. But here we don't have obstacles @ 4225 AMSL in "the zone"...
My conclusion? Definitely turn a/t and a/p off. But then I'd recommend a landing with 270 @ 46 only for pilots who are born near LOWS and who are "born in a B738". There is a reason why I'll never in my life apply for a job at Austrian (OS). You should be born in the Alps if you like to fly for OS.
There was no better solution than a return to Rhein/Main? Imho that's perfectly fine. For reasons, see my signature.
Comment