Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[mrFoot]

Hi Lasse,

I think the KLM wing view is possibly bordering on a bit too similar to the two you already have as the view is fairly standard. The Fokker wing view I think is worth uploading because although you already have two accepted the view is quite different and interesting. It could probably do with another kick of sharpening though.

I like the Turkish 737 but it's very much a 'grey area' image. I think it's worth trying but don't be too surprised if it gets a too far/centre rejection.

Thank you ,
I will sharpen the Fokker and probably try the other 2.

[HB-IHC]

Hi Guys & Gals

Does this image have to be uploaded as Ramp, Reggie or either category?

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/EHAM_03_1024.jpg

Thanks

pwf

[arjenp]

Hi,

I would like to know if the horizon is level and also if it's centered correctly?

Thanks!

[pdeboer]

Does this image have to be uploaded as Ramp, Reggie or either category?

For me this is a tail photo (a/c in front is the major object), so reggie. But I must say it is somewhat overexposed, tail is bit washed out

I would like to know if the horizon is level and also if it's centered correctly?

Horizon and centering are not a problem, but I am afraid it suffers from heat distortion (not cure-able) and the contrast is a bit of problem (overall dark; you need to shift the histo from left to right)

cheers, Pamela

[Bjorn1979]

Good evening,

Would appreciate if someone could have a look at this image :

http://img21.imageshack.us/f/img2755bewerkt.jpg/

Cheers
Bjorn

[HB-IHC]

For me this is a tail photo (a/c in front is the major object), so reggie. But I must say it is somewhat overexposed, tail is bit washed out
cheers, Pamela

1) Dank je wel Pamela... and many thanks for the heads up on the o/e... great to have a "second eye" I've been able to bring the detail out by reprocessing. Is it OK now?...

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/EHAM_03_1024.jpg

2) Also, based loosely on what seems to be the case these days, I think this should be a "Ramp" shot but, again, I really don't know how it will be regarded. Could someone advise please?...

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/EHAM_04_1024.jpg

3) And last but not least, I'd like to make this a "landmark" entry so could someone prescreen it please?...

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/JA705J_01_1024.jpg

Nas Drovia!


pwf

[mrFoot]

Good evening Screeners,

could you please give me some feedback about these 5 pictures.

I hope this picture is not too similiar to the 5th picture.


Thank you and have a nice weekend
Lasse

[Jan-Jasinski]

Thanks.
Do these ones stand a chance? Thanks again.
Rejected versions here and new ones attached:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3276952

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3276938

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3276936

7527
...

[pdeboer]

.

You are welcome Paul
no. 1 does have more contrast now, too much imo, I liked the overall contrast better in the previous one, tail still has some overexposedness.

no.2 looks oke, indeed a ramp one.

no.3 needs a tiny ccw rotation and it will be fine

[pdeboer]

could you please give me some feedback about these 5 pictures.

no. 1, 2 and 3 have compression artifacts, they are also in a small size. No.1 and 2 could be OK if you have these files in a larges size and sharpen them (both are very soft), no 3 is blurred, not to be saved imo.
no. 4 is OK
no.5 does look very similar to the one in the db. Would be a different story if you had an interesting background (landscape) to show

[pdeboer]

7527
...

Jan, first they are all too dark. Apart from that: first one is too far imo, second one is very soft, even somewhat blurred. Except for them being too dark no 3, 4 and 5 stand a chance. Are no 3 and 4 the same a/c? If so, pic one, otherwise they are too similar.

[pdeboer]

Good evening,

Would appreciate if someone could have a look at this image :

http://img21.imageshack.us/f/img2755bewerkt.jpg/

Cheers
Bjorn

Looks very OK to me

[Bjorn1979]

Thank you Pamela, just added it to the queue .

[HB-IHC]

You are welcome Paul
no. 1 does have more contrast now, too much imo, I liked the overall contrast better in the previous one, tail still has some overexposedness.

no.2 looks oke, indeed a ramp one.

no.3 needs a tiny ccw rotation and it will be fine

Excellent, thanks again Pamela... my guess is that I'm just about there with these two now then. Yes / No?

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/JA705J_01_1024.jpg

http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/dd171/groove_man/PH-BFW_1024.jpg

Paul

[pdeboer]

Jal is OK
But the tail... sorry to be such a pain, but now the whole image is dark again. I did a quick and dirty on it, I lightened the photo, except for the blow out part of the tail, here it is: http://tinypic.com/r/o5qb9t/7

hope that helps