If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.
I think the KLM wing view is possibly bordering on a bit too similar to the two you already have as the view is fairly standard. The Fokker wing view I think is worth uploading because although you already have two accepted the view is quite different and interesting. It could probably do with another kick of sharpening though.
I like the Turkish 737 but it's very much a 'grey area' image. I think it's worth trying but don't be too surprised if it gets a too far/centre rejection.
Thank you ,
I will sharpen the Fokker and probably try the other 2.
I would like to know if the horizon is level and also if it's centered correctly?
Horizon and centering are not a problem, but I am afraid it suffers from heat distortion (not cure-able) and the contrast is a bit of problem (overall dark; you need to shift the histo from left to right)
For me this is a tail photo (a/c in front is the major object), so reggie. But I must say it is somewhat overexposed, tail is bit washed out
cheers, Pamela
1) Dank je wel Pamela... and many thanks for the heads up on the o/e... great to have a "second eye" I've been able to bring the detail out by reprocessing. Is it OK now?...
2) Also, based loosely on what seems to be the case these days, I think this should be a "Ramp" shot but, again, I really don't know how it will be regarded. Could someone advise please?...
You are welcome Paul
no. 1 does have more contrast now, too much imo, I liked the overall contrast better in the previous one, tail still has some overexposedness.
no.2 looks oke, indeed a ramp one.
no.3 needs a tiny ccw rotation and it will be fine
could you please give me some feedback about these 5 pictures.
no. 1, 2 and 3 have compression artifacts, they are also in a small size. No.1 and 2 could be OK if you have these files in a larges size and sharpen them (both are very soft), no 3 is blurred, not to be saved imo.
no. 4 is OK
no.5 does look very similar to the one in the db. Would be a different story if you had an interesting background (landscape) to show
Jan, first they are all too dark. Apart from that: first one is too far imo, second one is very soft, even somewhat blurred. Except for them being too dark no 3, 4 and 5 stand a chance. Are no 3 and 4 the same a/c? If so, pic one, otherwise they are too similar.
You are welcome Paul
no. 1 does have more contrast now, too much imo, I liked the overall contrast better in the previous one, tail still has some overexposedness.
no.2 looks oke, indeed a ramp one.
no.3 needs a tiny ccw rotation and it will be fine
Excellent, thanks again Pamela... my guess is that I'm just about there with these two now then. Yes / No?
Jal is OK
But the tail... sorry to be such a pain, but now the whole image is dark again. I did a quick and dirty on it, I lightened the photo, except for the blow out part of the tail, here it is: http://tinypic.com/r/o5qb9t/7
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment