Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[rmk2112]

Hi ya,
Should this shot of the tiled tail end of PH-BQP be uploaded as a ramp shot or as a standard aircraft one?
Regards
René

[Bjorn1979]

Hello,

Is this crop acceptable ?

http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/6592/img8586bewerkt.jpg

Thanks for your time.

Cheers
Bjorn

[ntduong]

I have this photo uploaded and rejected with reason: over processed.

I have edited again with all normal procedures. Is the quality possible for JP or I just keep it as personal collection? Thank you.

[g.forwood]

Hi All,

I've spent quite some time trying to edit these shots, and I'm hoping they're up to scratch. The first two were taken during a dust storm, hence the noise and lack of visibility. The last one involved a journey into the realm of curves (with which I'm not entirely confident). If work still needs to be done, I would appreciate any guidance!

Cheers,
Gareth

[MOB]

Hi,

Could a screener take a look at these two shots and
advise me on if I should upload them - thanks,

Mike

[Siegi N.]

Hi,
Please opinin for photo:
1.


2.


3.



4.

I use levels and curves, I did as a guide http://www.jid.me.uk/tutorial1.html (thank to Alex Saffe)
Hope contrast better now.
Regards,
Siegi.

[RingwaySam]

Sorry for the late reply guys.

1. René - Looks good. I'd upload it as a ramp.
2. Bjorn - Looks a little low in the frame to me but apart from that the crop looks good.
3. ntduong - Have you used any noise reduction?
4. Gareth - IMO the first two are lacking in contrast. As for the third I like it a lot.
5. Mike - The first is very compressed, not sure if that's down to JP forums or not. The second looks quite soft.
6. Siegi - First needs some CW rotation (around 0.3 looks ok to me), the others all look acceptable. The jaggies could do with being erased on the second Transaero a bit more though.

Just my opinion, doesn't mean they'll all get accepted


Sam

[Atamvir Multani]

Hi guys,
Did some working on these shots , are they worthy enough now to be uploaded??

Thanks for your time.!!

[Bjorn1979]

Sorry for the late reply guys.


Bjorn - Looks a little low in the frame to me but apart from that the crop looks good.

Just my opinion, doesn't mean they'll all get accepted



Sam

Haha Sam, had that experience a couple of times
Thanks, will place the a/c a bit higher in the frame.

[MOB]

RingwaySam,

Thanks for your imput...

Mike.

[g.forwood]

Sorry for the late reply guys.

1. Gareth - IMO the first two are lacking in contrast. As for the third I like it a lot.

Hi Sam,

Thanks for the reply and advice - I'll have a play with the contrast.

[rmk2112]

Thanks Sam
Regards
René

[brianw999]

Hi guys,
Did some working on these shots , are they worthy enough now to be uploaded??

Thanks for your time.!!

1. Appears to be a little soft.
2. Soft, grainy and leaning to the left.
3. Slightly soft. It might make it but one or two passes of USM at 50_0.2_0 should finish it nicely.
4. Leaning to the left. Use a centre vertical to level it.

[Atamvir Multani]

1. Appears to be a little soft.
2. Soft, grainy and leaning to the left.
3. Slightly soft. It might make it but one or two passes of USM at 50_0.2_0 should finish it nicely.
4. Leaning to the left. Use a centre vertical to level it.

Thanks Brian , will work on them.

[g.forwood]

Similar?

Hi all,

I'm just wondering if these two shots would be considered similar? They were taken from the same aircraft probably about 20-30 seconds apart. They show (in my opinion) significantly different areas of the airport but I thought I'd just ask before uploading. Also, I'm assuming this should be uploaded under the aircraft's registration with wing view and airport categories selected - is this correct?

Of course, if there are any quality related issues I'd be happy for your advice!

Thanks so much for the help,
Gareth