Tweet
Hi, anybody willing to help with the post I wrote, it is 5 before this one and was asking for help on an oversharpen rejection... greatly appreciate any input!!
-
-
Well after the thumbs up from Pamela I was given this http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2101625.
What needs to be done?
-ChrisComment
-
It has a yellow cast which is also affecting the contrast. Set the grey point on the main gear tyre, adjust the dark tone side of the histogram just a little and you get this result in the middle part...Well after the thumbs up from Pamela I was given this http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2101625.
What needs to be done?
http://img222.imageshack.us/my.php?i...72117v2kk3.jpgIf it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
"Alwaysconcorde",
Unfortunately the image is overexposed with the whites being completely blown out on the fuselage and tail. In bright light like this I tend to underexpose by -.3 to -0.7 EV to retain some highlight detail which can be worked on in PS.
Sharpening wise, it is already a bit oversharp in the original. Do you have any kind of auto sharpness set in camera when you take the picture ? If you do, turn it off if possible.
Unfortunately, one for the personal collection I think.If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Thanks Brian! I have a point and shoot camera (Lumix DMC-LZ6) but I've learned a lot how to use the advanced features but I've read these cameras usually do some sort of processing inside, don't they?, unfortunately in this one it didn't work.. well ok
I have other pics of this plane, guess i'll try those....Comment
-
Hey guys do you think 1 or 2 passes of 50_0.2_0 should do the trick?
Thanks
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2106170
Comment
-
1 pass should be ok. see how it goes and possibly try 2Comment
-
-
Hello gents,
Rejected because it's blurry. Can I have your comments on it?
Thanks
A portuguese photojournalist living in Brazil.
Comment
-
The picture has an overall blur to it. Sharpening has no effect so there isn't even an element of "soft" in it. Not recoverable I'm afraid.Hello gents,
Rejected because it's blurry. Can I have your comments on it?
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Thank you for your prompt reply, Brian.Originally posted by brianw999 View Post
Also, thank you for yr comment on the "Euroatlantic" Tristar.
Best regards
José LuisA portuguese photojournalist living in Brazil.
Comment
-
ok so i just got this rejection
reasons :Overexposed and backlit
i clicked the picture in question with this effect in mind...doeas'nt it appeal?
ThanksComment
-
Sadly the sky is rather blown out. If you deliberately increased the exposure during processing you might just possibly be able to recover this, if not then it would be best to move on I am afraid.Originally posted by flyguy_shekar View Postok so i just got this rejection
reasons :Overexposed and backlit
i clicked the picture in question with this effect in mind...doeas'nt it appeal?
ThanksComment
-
Hello.
Again one of my Fokker Window views was rejected. This time for Soft and Contrast
Soft should be no problem, but contrast. Any hints what can be made better? As said before the windows were very dirty on that flight.
Thanks for your help!
georg
________
ECIGS123Last edited by DRS-Spotter; 2011-09-16, 07:23.Comment
-
Originally posted by DRS-Spotter View PostHello.
Again one of my Fokker Window views was rejected. This time for Soft and Contrast
Soft should be no problem, but contrast. Any hints what can be made better? As said before the windows were very dirty on that flight.
Thanks for your help!
georg
Hmmm the contrast is a bit high but IMO not over done. Drop it down a bit sharpen the shot up and I think it will be fine.Comment
Comment