Originally posted by Fredda9000
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by ErwinS View PostThe road behind the runway is a good point to level her.
In this case there is no reliable vertical reference line. That said, the rejection is a bit harsh. Nevertheless, looking at the fenceposts they are all slightly leaning to the left. I'd rotate it about 0.5° CW.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fredda9000 View PostSo what is the final verdict? It's a big differens between magic48's 0,5 degrees and ErwinS suggestion. Or should i just appeal the rejection?
Comment
-
This is one of those really difficult ones. Given that trees generally grow straight up the key that catches my eye is the tree aligned with the main gear in the centre of the picture. Visually that makes me think that the original is pretty well on the mark.
I'm not helping very much, am I ?If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Hi everyone,
Got this picture rejected:
Reasons:
- overprocessed/bad postprocessing
I'm a bit puzzled where this remark may refer to. Any suggestions?
And rejected one:
Reason:
- jpg compression artefacts
Still, after reading a lot of stuff about this problem, I find it very difficult to solve this. I don't see it in this picture.
Funny enough, this picture was accepted but processed the same way as the rejected one:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7383481
Thanks in advance for any comments/help/suggestions.
Matthew Lima
Comment
-
Originally posted by MatthewLima View PostHi everyone,
Got this picture rejected:
Reasons:
- overprocessed/bad postprocessing
I'm a bit puzzled where this remark may refer to. Any suggestions?
And rejected one:
Reason:
- jpg compression artefacts
Still, after reading a lot of stuff about this problem, I find it very difficult to solve this. I don't see it in this picture.
Funny enough, this picture was accepted but processed the same way as the rejected one:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7383481
Thanks in advance for any comments/help/suggestions.
Matthew Lima
The second pic, I see compression on the tail of the a/c. The green and blue around the koru show it easiest. With regards to your accepted pic, there is some compression, however, not as much as in your rejected pic.
Hope this helps.Sam Rudge
A 5D3, some Canon lenses, the Sigma L and a flash
Comment
-
Who can find the dustspot?? I can't! Thanks in advance...
Comment
-
Originally posted by CO777/200 View PostWho can find the dustspot?? I can't! Thanks in advance...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867743
I can see it on the left side under the nose.
Unfortunately, I cannot attach now a screenshot, but it is visible clearly.
Best regards,
Erez.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CO777/200 View PostWho can find the dustspot?? I can't! Thanks in advance...
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3867743
Cheers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael Wolf View PostYou should rely on the Equalize tool with every image you edit, this will prevent any CMOS dust rejections in the future.
Cheers.
Comment
Comment