Originally posted by screaming_emu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Colgan DHC-8 crashed in Buffalo
Collapse
X
-
-
Anyone familiar with the "sheer pins" located at the Autopilot Servoes?..
I have been thinking about the possibility that something went wrong and they never broke lose from the servoes and the gears, turning the aircraft really difficult to fly....is like trying to fly a "typewriter machine"...
A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....
Comment
-
Originally posted by screaming_emu View PostProbably not a professional one though.
A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....
Comment
-
This was published by AVWEB today, Monday 16 Feb.
Top News: Latest Details on Buffalo Crash back to top
It appears more is involved than simple icing and a tail stall.Don
Standard practice for managers around the world:
Ready - Fire - Aim! DAMN! Missed again!
Comment
-
Originally posted by AVION1 View PostAnyone familiar with the "sheer pins" located at the Autopilot Servoes?..
I have been thinking about the possibility that something went wrong and they never broke lose from the servoes and the gears, turning the aircraft really difficult to fly....is like trying to fly a "typewriter machine"...
PD: The sheer pins are supposed to break in case the A/P doesn't disengage by itself..
Comment
-
Something that has struck me as unusual looking back over the things we know so far.
At the time of the incident, when the aircraft was established inbound in a flap 5, gear down configuration, was the it was only flying at 134kts.
Now given that the crew had selected the +20kts reference speed switch that would seem awfully slow to me 5~6 miles from touchdown.
Bearinf in mind that BUF is not as busy as larger airports, but most airport arrival sequences usually involve a 160kt speed restriction to the marker. I know here at YYZ we use 160kts in IMC and 170kts in VMC. One of the benefits of this restriction is that the tower knows exactly what speed the inbound aircraft is at in oder to guage its departure intervals.
Now with the +20 switch enacted that would mean that at 134kts, the aircraft would otherwise have been at 114kts, again this just seems too slow that far out.
I saw some figures on pprune that suggested for the approx landing weight (which i assume would be a guess - not sure if it was from a DH8D pilot or not) that the aircraft should have been at approx 164kts with the +20 switch engaged. At that distance from the runway that seems to be a more logical speed.
Whats interesting though is that even at 134kts, it seems the autopilot was not constantly trimming the aircraft as one would expect if it was about to enter a stalled condition.Garry Lewis
Air Team Images - www.airteamimages.com
Air Traffic Controller - Toronto ACC (West Low)
https://flic.kr/ps/AAWk8
Comment
-
Originally posted by LiaNY View PostIs it possible that wind shear was involved since the plane took such a big drop in altitude so fast? Forgive me if I am way off base but I am not a pilot.
Comment
-
Now with the +20 switch enacted that would mean that at 134kts...
SORRY, I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT SWITCH.
IS THAT SWITCH SOMETHING LIKE AN ALCOHOL-WATER POWER BOOSTER INJECTED IN THE COMBUSTION CANS?
I REMEMBER THE METROLINER HAS THIS FEATURE !! YOU CAN GET ABOUT 20% MORE POWER OR TORQUE..SPECIALLY IF YOU ARE IN TROUBLE.
A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....
Comment
-
I have read all of the previous posts. Perhaps too quickly to know if my question has been answered. If the deicer boots were on for the majority of the flight, How would the aerodynamics of the wing or H-stab be changed by ice if the deicer boots were functioning?
I read one post that said it is possible that ice built up behind the boots but that would be a serious issue wouldn't it? One that would have caused other accidents in the past and since corrected?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AVION1 View PostNow with the +20 switch enacted that would mean that at 134kts...
SORRY, I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT SWITCH.
IS THAT SWITCH SOMETHING LIKE AN ALCOHOL-WATER POWER BOOSTER INJECTED IN THE COMBUSTION CANS?
I REMEMBER THE METROLINER HAS THIS FEATURE !! YOU CAN GET ABOUT 20% MORE POWER OR TORQUE..SPECIALLY IF YOU ARE IN TROUBLE.
Comment
-
Originally posted by scottkin View PostJust an educated quess here Lia. The reason it dropped so fast because the airplane stalled. Like dropping a brick off a 20 story building.
On a related note, I have flown in many turbo props when we had to land or take off in thunderstorms...or remained in the clouds in thunderstorms while in a holding pattern. The pilots would always come on and explain that it might be bumpy (and sometimes it was) but it was never so bad that I thought I was going to die.
The worst turbulence I experienced was in clear, perfect sunny weather flying over the mountains on a Seattle to NYC flight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AVION1 View Postfrom Spartan School of Aeronautics with an A/S in AMT...AMEL/Instruments and A&P, and a Repairman Certificate for the Repair Station I am working as Avionics Chief Inspector. Any more questions?
now that doesn't make me qualified as a professional avionics chief inspector, does it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LiaNY View PostI have read about the stalling but would a stall cause an aircraft to drop that fast?
On a related note, I have flown in many turbo props when we had to land or take off in thunderstorms...or remained in the clouds in thunderstorms while in a holding pattern. The pilots would always come on and explain that it might be bumpy (and sometimes it was) but it was never so bad that I thought I was going to die.
The worst turbulence I experienced was in clear, perfect sunny weather flying over the mountains on a Seattle to NYC flight.
Comment
Comment