Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
User Profile
Collapse
-
Alright, thanks!...
-
Well, I matched the horizon on nr 1 to the mast in the bg but I don't know what to match it to to get a more level horizon. All my photos in this location is level to that mast. So I changed shoot, is this better?
...
Leave a comment:
-
Would someone be able to help me with some advice/pre-screen on these two please:
The first one I believe is ok as it has good direct sunlight, is level and sharp. But please point out any issues you might find.
The second one also has direct sunligh but I'm unsure about the sharpness, it is significantly less sharp than the first photo but I though it might be within the limits. It might be overexposed as well but I don't know.
Thanks for the help to any screener who decides helps me!...
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, would someone be able to help me with a quick pre-screen on this one please. I guess this would be a contrast issue or at least borderline due to the lighting conditions but please point out any other issues and if I'm wrong about the contrast.
...
Leave a comment:
-
Would I be able to get a pre-screen on this one please
And would this fall under cutoff and obstruction?
...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Would I be able to get pre-screened as well?
I'm not used to these kinds of lighting conditions and the phone as a camera so what I'm most concerned about in this one is noise/softness.
...
Leave a comment:
-
Yea, I think I will have to leave this one as I don't believe I will be able to make it suitable for the database. Thanks for the help!...
Leave a comment:
-
Ahh, I get it sorry.
I rotated it slightly ccw now and brought the brightness down while giving it a bit more contrast as well.
I don't know if this is better? But do you think that the very bright sign in the bg will mess with the screening result if/when i put it in the queue?
...
Leave a comment:
-
Alright, I'm probably stupid for asking but what does ccw stand for?...
Leave a comment:
-
I'm having some problems editing this one, I didn't think I would need pre-screening on this one but I feel like that would help me. I'm unsure about these points: Horizon (as I think it looks bad whatever I match it to) and sharpness/softness I don't know if this is a good balance of that ether. I think I've managed to fix a pretty good contrast but please point out any issues you find. Also, would that sign in the bg make the image "overexposed"?
...
Leave a comment:
-
Well, alright thanks though! Next time I'll ask you before submitting the appeal....
Leave a comment:
-
Well, that is too bad, but I get it. Can I ask you again when I've gotten the appeal result or how ame I ever going to know that then? As I wrote in the last sentence of the last post I don't want you to have anything with the appeal it selfe to do. Only some general advice on how hot for new regs work in similar situations....
Leave a comment:
-
Dana, I got the photo of the Saab JAS-39 Gripen rejected for hot as the reg was already in the database and the aircraft was not active. (Invalid hot)
I have already appealed it but I would like to know more about how the new reg hot works.
This was the comment from the screener "Inactive aircraft aren't considered hot, unless it's completely new reg to the database. We already have reg 813 in te db, hence the rejection." But I can not find any photo of this aircraft with this reg only other military aircraft of different countries, so I don't believe that to be a factor for an rejection or please tell me if I'm wrong. Also the fact that inactive aircraft wouldn't be hot I have never heard before, whats the guidelines for hot new reg's then? Because from what I can see in the upload guidelines nothing like that is stated.
Im not asking you to help me with the appeal here I'm just trying to get some clarification on how this works. Thanks!...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Aha, I was expecting worse feedback on all of them to be honest! I'll actually try to fix some of them up but I won't ask you again. Thanks!
Now that I got that feedback I also want to ask you if this angle would be aceptable for jetphotos as well or is the wing blocking too much of it? I don't believe this one has a good edit yet so I don't need a pre-screen on it if you don't think otherwise.
...
Leave a comment:
-
I visited a aviation museum and took some photos with my phone, I picked out some of the better ones here so would someone be able to comment on these and maybe even pre-screen them for me. I'm not used to take photos with my phone usually but I believe I at least should have one or 2 photos suitable for Jetphotos. When I took these photos I noticed that there was a whole bunch of stuff in the way (obstruction/clutter) so for example this SK50 I had to cut the elevator off due to a thin cable going all the way from the floor to the roof, I have seen photos in the databade before with obstructions taken in these kinds of locations so I don't know if it is as strict as it would be on a "normal" planespotting location.
I would really appreciate some feedback on these ones, thanks!
...
Leave a comment:
-
aah, I see.
I won't ask you to comment more on this one but is this a good balance between being overexposure and dark/under exposed?
...
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I don't really know what to do about the borderline contrast, I believe it doen't have to do with light has there was a clear sky. Is there to little contrast in this image then?...
Leave a comment:
-
Is this still too visible?
Also I believe I fixed the dark and contrast and hopefully noisy issue as well or what do you think?
...
Leave a comment:
No activity results to display
Show More
Leave a comment: