Originally posted by RCoulter
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A Quick Reference Guide to Categories
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by pdeboer View PostIs the Zlin 526 vintage and small prop?
Small prop is def needed imo.
Rgds,
Comment
-
Originally posted by RCoulter View PostDid I forget to check "warbird" on this?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3284260
Nice Mustangs btw.
rgds,
Comment
-
Originally posted by ErwinS View PostWell the original Z-526 was originally designed by Zlin Aircraft in 1959 so you could say she is vintage but I don't thik we have them as such in the dbase?
Small prop is def needed imo.
Rgds,
Comment
-
Originally posted by ErwinS View PostWell the original Z-526 was originally designed by Zlin Aircraft in 1959 so you could say she is vintage but I don't thik we have them as such in the dbase?
Small prop is def needed imo.
Rgds,
Maybe this is one of those that we should accept with and without vintage ticked ?If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Small prop category confusing
I'm still having difficulties understanding when or when not to use the 'small prop' category.
After having read all contents in this thread, I have learned that all Cessna 400's are designated as 'small prop', how about Cessna T303's?
And why is a BN Islander 'small prop', and a Beech King Air not?
I fail to see the logic in that. Wouldn't it be more practical to designate all single engined aircraft as small prop and leave all twin engined aircraft out of this category?
And why are props categorized in this way and jetengined a/c not?
Just curious to know
Comment
Comment