Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bad Info

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bad Info

    Hi All

    This is second time i had this picture rejected for bad info. The first time the registration should have been 55-0295. The second time i posted this picture with that rego and i was rejected for bad info. Not sure what i did wrong. Note do not have c/n.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7513726

    This may be wrong forum but the same picture also got rejected for 'over processed / bad processing'. Any guidance much appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew

  • #2
    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
    Hi All

    This is second time i had this picture rejected for bad info. The first time the registration should have been 55-0295. The second time i posted this picture with that rego and i was rejected for bad info. Not sure what i did wrong. Note do not have c/n.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7513726

    This may be wrong forum but the same picture also got rejected for 'over processed / bad processing'. Any guidance much appreciated.

    TIA
    Andrew
    Image was missing cn.

    Comment


    • #3
      And the cn is already in the Database
      https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/29739

      Comment


      • #4
        Also a bit low in frame.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Nick Sheeder View Post
          Also a bit low in frame.
          Image was not rejected for centering, not should it have been.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi All

            I had this picture rejected for bad info:
            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7868664

            I am not sure what i typed wrong. I thought i entered 9V-OJI.

            TIA
            Andrew

            Comment


            • #7
              Hi All

              I recently discovered i have two pictures with wrong data that have been screened and accepted.

              https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9127007 this should be 9M-LNJ (not 9M-LNG)

              and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9620350 which should be JA705J (not JA705A).

              I am guessing these were typo errors when i submitted the pictures. I have sent a 'Correct Info' request for both pictures. Is this the right process to use? or should i do something else.

              TIA
              Andrew

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
                Hi All

                I recently discovered i have two pictures with wrong data that have been screened and accepted.

                https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9127007 this should be 9M-LNJ (not 9M-LNG)

                and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9620350 which should be JA705J (not JA705A).

                I am guessing these were typo errors when i submitted the pictures. I have sent a 'Correct Info' request for both pictures. Is this the right process to use? or should i do something else.

                TIA
                Andrew
                They are both fixed.

                Regards,
                Sebastian

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi All

                  Pilatus PC-21 a small prop?

                  TIA
                  Andrew

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by AndrewL View Post
                    Hi All

                    Pilatus PC-21 a small prop?

                    TIA
                    Andrew
                    Yes.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hi All

                      re Warbird/Vintage categories. A 1966 Beechcraft D18S falls into this category however as it takes up to 8 passengers should it also be flagged as a 'small prop'? This was a non-military version.

                      If the Beechcraft is not classed as a small prop in the warbird/vintage category what rules when a warbird/vintage is not a small prop?

                      TIA
                      Andrew

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X