User Profile

[dlowwa]

Both images are soft and compressed....

[dlowwa]

1-2. soft, contrast. not fixable
3. heat haze. not fixable.
4-5. contrast...

[dlowwa]

Would have been acceptable for me, but obviously some others would disagree....

[dlowwa]

I see potential issues with overprocessing, horizon, and exposure....

[dlowwa]

Wouldn't be for me....

[dlowwa]

Well something happened above the tail, and give how perfectly circular it is, are you sure something wasn't done in that area?...

[dlowwa]

Quality looks ok to me....

[dlowwa]

Borderline for the grass, but definitely obstruction from the APU(?)....

[dlowwa]

A bit, but acceptable for me.



Also a bit dark, but centering ok for me....

[dlowwa]

1. soft, heat hazed, overexposed
2. borderline overexposed
3. overexposed
4. heat hazed, overexposed
5. overexposed, borderline soft...

[dlowwa]

1-2 borderline contrast. will not comment on these again.
3. soft
4. soft/blurry, too far, noisy
5. borderline dark/contrast. yes night shot....

[dlowwa]

Noise, contrast, and underexposure are issues I can see....

[dlowwa]

A bit dark on all four, but close to being acceptable, so only minor adjustments needed I think....

[dlowwa]

1. soft, maybe even a bit blurry
2. dirty
3-5 contrast, vignetting, compression - there's a vertical band on all three on the left side of the frame...

[dlowwa]

Also soft....

[dlowwa]

As I said, no special category is needed....

[dlowwa]

Image would be rejected for soft....

[dlowwa]

Quality looks ok for me....

[dlowwa]

Yes....

[dlowwa]

1. soft, overexposed
2. we don't prescreen similar images....